Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:34 am
by Steeler [Crawler2]
"The problem is that the west and non muslim countries dont want Muslims to run there own country with there religion."
Why do you think this is???
We don't have a problem with countries like South Korea or Japan running their own affairs. We even tolerate the incredibly annoying Chavez. Why is there a problem with Islamist governments?
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:49 pm
by Ashlee
i support them because they actually know what they're doing. can't say the same for the icu.
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:54 pm
by Spider_loc
Mad mac china is capable of damagin america really hard even worse they could defeat them so thats why the united states doesnt fukk with the big boys in world china japen Russia iran they rather focus on the weak preventing them from getting strong.
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:55 pm
by Qaarxiye
I support them because that's where my stomach lies.
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:46 pm
by DONKEYMAN
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:39 am
by xoogSADE14
highclass
you were more than happy to give the war mongering ICU a chance so why not the TFG?
try to answer that question maturely without resorting to the usual "amxaaro this or tikree that".
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:36 am
by Steeler [Crawler2]
Spider
China would lose a direct confrontation, but we HAVE NO INTEREST in a direct confrontation with China nor do they. We are TRADING PARTNERS - and massive ones at that.
As for Japan, why, at the end of WW II, didn't we just keep Japan down? Why, at the end of WW II didn't we just keep South Korea down? Why didn't we keep Germany down? Why the Marshal Plan? If US foreign policy revolves around exploitation and the suppression of indigenous governments, why didn't we try to keep India in turmoil? Why didn't we suppress Brazil and it's new growth? Why did we allow leftists to come to power in those countries now? Why not kill them off?
We have disagreements with other countries, but they remain civil. Why not with Islam? Walk the dog.
