I understand what you are saying adn where your coming from..and you do raise valid points.
The only reason I said Voltage backed out was he didnt present his argument ..persistent enough to get his message across, regardless of the discussion being shifted.
TL, its true(what sadeboi is saying), dont just talk like you are impartial here..cos you are not. the fact is these 2 guys argument started with a basic thesis
which was to compare major accomplishment between those presidents the nation had.
Now, one can argue (whatever they want) that a president didnt have much acomplishemnet compared with the other..but had other stronger points..or he left power without any resistence..or one president destroyed his own accoplishments by becoming a dictator..etc etc
but that doesnt take away the fact that when comparing oranges..wwe have to limit the argument with oranges and dont let apple's get involved..thats a fair argument i believe.
Obviously.. everyone sees and judges things differently.
