SomaliNet Forums

kulmbi oo yaad ahaan jirtay? maanad Daaroood ahayn, mise ceeb baa ku galay oo qolo kalaad noqotay?

These cultures are unique to specific clans. Wife beating is exclusive Ogaden and reer Xamar territory. Other things Kambuli mentioned are all things Raxanweyta and Garre people do and maybe Jareerta too.

[quote="michael_ital"][quote="Basra-"] I think Highland u r mythisizing the widely well know ritual of the ogadenia or the qabils of somalia who live in the rural area. It is a well known somali custom where a husband will discipline his wife. In ogadenia--as a qabil they are below average in the intellectual sphere. Therefore, ogaden womens intellectual would be far below than the men.(thus understanding the rationality of the ogaden woman whipping) A whip or a stick is used to do the job. Uncle is right- somalis are the fore-bearers of bondage. Uncle should know because he is mj. (actually not somalis but the bondage emerged because of its necessity which i will explain shortly)

Highland what u r describing is NOT part of it. U r talking about slavery there. I think u have watched american movies about slavery.

Essentially, submissivenes is desired in women. A little whipping is not harmful. But i desire it during the act of copulation where my mind is wrapped in the role of submitting. But during the day, when i am wearing my work clothes with my hand bag- i will be severly turned off if my hubby whips out his whip and wanting to whip me with it. That would be out of context and bizarre!


But my curiousity is---When sex was first invented---was it deseigned to work properly by two opposite participants? One dorminat and strong, and the other submissive and weak? What is it in our programmed brains that make sex amazing by one one total dom and the other total sub? Like for example angry make up sex- why is sooo amazing or extraordinary? Romantics would want to call it "Passion" but i think it is far deeper than that. I think it is about violance and power. One has the power and the other is powerless. A complete order. Without these two components there is only disorderly dull sex.In the old homo sapiens days-- men were visually strong. Muscular, bearded, strong manly ordour, and women the opposite. Since then ,man has evolved into a more meek,gentile metro sexual creature, with slimness, no muscles, shaved beard, and less testestrones. So essentially, they r only Man by virtue of their hearts desire, which interestingly enough had not changed. They are left with masculine creative mind--that wants the woman to do weird rituals so he can feel strong and manly and therefore have a maximum performance.Thats why bondage later existed. Each sex wanted to execise their biological right. One to dorminate and the other to be beaten, cry, and therefore truly submit and delude or deceive the Man that he is ...."the Man".

Of course upon orgasm the side effects of the beating is regretful. [/quote]

Wallahi, i'm focking speechless here.[/quote]







Mikey why??? Cant articulate your speechlessness? I want to read your opinion.

Well, in the FAR past, you played little Miss Prissy. And in the recent past, you began "flirting" with sexual innuendoes in your posts. Now, you've let it ALL hang out. And I must say, as a Professional in these matters, your post above is very revealing. Pretty much everything you wrote reeks of personal experience. Me likes.

Of course upon orgasm the side effects of the beating is regretful.

What happened asexual Basra we used to know.

lool Mikey,, Why so speechless bro. There is only point that she wanted to reveal to us which is the part she said "A little whipping is not harmful. But i desire it during the act of copulation where my mind is wrapped in the role of submitting". So u take it for what it is.

Kambuli,, those r as strange as what Highland is talking about. This " Ka Taag" is the strangest of them all. Let me guess it would be disrespect for the husband to interrupt this stranger while he "ka taagayaa" his wife.

[quote="michael_ital"]Well, in the FAR past, you played little Miss Prissy. And in the recent past, you began "flirting" with sexual innuendoes in your posts. Now, you've let it ALL hang out. And I must say, as a Professional in these matters, your post above is very revealing. Pretty much everything you wrote reeks of personal experience. Me likes. [/quote]


"Pretty much everything you wrote reeks of personal experience. Me likes"





Mikey what an interesting perspective! I like your insightful reasonings! Bravo Mikey!




PS: I hope u dear u were not sexualy excited for it was certainly not my intention. I guess i tapped in the inner desire of your manliness. And coincidentally, confirmed u r the freaky mikey i have always suspected u to be!

[quote="Gatspy"]lool Mikey,, Why so speechless bro. There is only point that she wanted to reveal to us which is the part she said "[b]A little whipping is not harmful. But i desire it during the act of copulation where my mind is wrapped in the role of submitting[/b]". So u take it for what it is.

Kambuli,, those r as strange as what Highland is talking about. This " Ka Taag" is the strangest of them all. Let me guess it would be disrespect for the husband to interrupt this stranger while he "ka taagayaa" his wife.[/quote]



LOL@Gatsby



You make me come off so technical and calculative. As if in every post i reveal what i want to reveal . U should know i am open book by now. Gatsby....something tells me u r an avid reader and analyzer of my posts. Why do u read my posts in silent?

Basra- wrote: I think Highland u r mythisizing the widely well know ritual of the ogadenia or the qabils of somalia who live in the rural area. It is a well known somali custom where a husband will discipline his wife. In ogadenia--as a qabil they are below average in the intellectual sphere. Therefore, ogaden womens intellectual would be far below than the men.(thus understanding the rationality of the ogaden woman whipping) A whip or a stick is used to do the job. Uncle is right- somalis are the fore-bearers of bondage. Uncle should know because he is mj. (actually not somalis but the bondage emerged because of its necessity which i will explain shortly)

Highland what u r describing is NOT part of it. U r talking about slavery there. I think u have watched american movies about slavery.

Essentially, submissivenes is desired in women. A little whipping is not harmful. But i desire it during the act of copulation where my mind is wrapped in the role of submitting. But during the day, when i am wearing my work clothes with my hand bag- i will be severly turned off if my hubby whips out his whip and wanting to whip me with it. That would be out of context and bizarre!


But my curiousity is---When sex was first invented---was it deseigned to work properly by two opposite participants? One dorminat and strong, and the other submissive and weak? What is it in our programmed brains that make sex amazing by one one total dom and the other total sub? Like for example angry make up sex- why is sooo amazing or extraordinary? Romantics would want to call it "Passion" but i think it is far deeper than that. I think it is about violance and power. One has the power and the other is powerless. A complete order. Without these two components there is only disorderly dull sex.In the old homo sapiens days-- men were visually strong. Muscular, bearded, strong manly ordour, and women the opposite. Since then ,man has evolved into a more meek,gentile metro sexual creature, with slimness, no muscles, shaved beard, and less testestrones. So essentially, they r only Man by virtue of their hearts desire, which interestingly enough had not changed. They are left with masculine creative mind--that wants the woman to do weird rituals so he can feel strong and manly and therefore have a maximum performance.Thats why bondage later existed. Each sex wanted to execise their biological right. One to dorminate and the other to be beaten, cry, and therefore truly submit and delude or deceive the Man that he is ...."the Man".

Of course upon orgasm the side effects of the beating is regretful.

This is so very very wrong

Keyse quote " kulmbi oo yaad ahaan jirtay? maanad Daaroood ahayn, mise ceeb baa ku galay oo qolo kalaad noqotay?"




Inaa Lilaahu Wa Inaa Ileehi raajicuun Miskiin

Hadda Ilaahbaan kugu dhaarshee ma waxaad dood ka dhigatey ama cay ka dhigatey nimanka xubintooda taranka? Waar maxaa ka sii ah, maalinba maalinta ka dambeysa waad kasii dareysaa..Sowdiga ka dhigey maaha?

[quote="Foxy22"][quote="Basra-"] I think Highland u r mythisizing the widely well know ritual of the ogadenia or the qabils of somalia who live in the rural area. It is a well known somali custom where a husband will discipline his wife. In ogadenia--as a qabil they are below average in the intellectual sphere. Therefore, ogaden womens intellectual would be far below than the men.(thus understanding the rationality of the ogaden woman whipping) A whip or a stick is used to do the job. Uncle is right- somalis are the fore-bearers of bondage. Uncle should know because he is mj. (actually not somalis but the bondage emerged because of its necessity which i will explain shortly)

Highland what u r describing is NOT part of it. U r talking about slavery there. I think u have watched american movies about slavery.

Essentially, submissivenes is desired in women. A little whipping is not harmful. But i desire it during the act of copulation where my mind is wrapped in the role of submitting. But during the day, when i am wearing my work clothes with my hand bag- i will be severly turned off if my hubby whips out his whip and wanting to whip me with it. That would be out of context and bizarre!


But my curiousity is---When sex was first invented---was it deseigned to work properly by two opposite participants? One dorminat and strong, and the other submissive and weak? What is it in our programmed brains that make sex amazing by one one total dom and the other total sub? Like for example angry make up sex- why is sooo amazing or extraordinary? Romantics would want to call it "Passion" but i think it is far deeper than that. I think it is about violance and power. One has the power and the other is powerless. A complete order. Without these two components there is only disorderly dull sex.In the old homo sapiens days-- men were visually strong. Muscular, bearded, strong manly ordour, and women the opposite. Since then ,man has evolved into a more meek,gentile metro sexual creature, with slimness, no muscles, shaved beard, and less testestrones. So essentially, they r only Man by virtue of their hearts desire, which interestingly enough had not changed. They are left with masculine creative mind--that wants the woman to do weird rituals so he can feel strong and manly and therefore have a maximum performance.Thats why bondage later existed. Each sex wanted to execise their biological right. One to dorminate and the other to be beaten, cry, and therefore truly submit and delude or deceive the Man that he is ...."the Man".

Of course upon orgasm the side effects of the beating is regretful. [/quote]

This is so very very wrong [/quote]



fOXY??? You have an opinion too??? What is so very very wrong about it? Do u guys have trouble expressing your opinions or feelings? I am buffled here.

Basra- wrote:

michael_ital wrote:Well, in the FAR past, you played little Miss Prissy. And in the recent past, you began "flirting" with sexual innuendoes in your posts. Now, you've let it ALL hang out. And I must say, as a Professional in these matters, your post above is very revealing. Pretty much everything you wrote reeks of personal experience. Me likes.

"Pretty much everything you wrote reeks of personal experience. Me likes"





Mikey what an interesting perspective! I like your insightful reasonings! Bravo Mikey!




PS: I hope u dear u were not sexualy excited for it was certainly not my intention. I guess i tapped in the inner desire of your manliness. And coincidentally, confirmed u r the freaky mikey i have always suspected u to be!

P.S Yes. Yes I was sexualy excited. And yes, you did.

Basra- wrote:

Foxy22 wrote:

Basra- wrote: I think Highland u r mythisizing the widely well know ritual of the ogadenia or the qabils of somalia who live in the rural area. It is a well known somali custom where a husband will discipline his wife. In ogadenia--as a qabil they are below average in the intellectual sphere. Therefore, ogaden womens intellectual would be far below than the men.(thus understanding the rationality of the ogaden woman whipping) A whip or a stick is used to do the job. Uncle is right- somalis are the fore-bearers of bondage. Uncle should know because he is mj. (actually not somalis but the bondage emerged because of its necessity which i will explain shortly)

Highland what u r describing is NOT part of it. U r talking about slavery there. I think u have watched american movies about slavery.

Essentially, submissivenes is desired in women. A little whipping is not harmful. But i desire it during the act of copulation where my mind is wrapped in the role of submitting. But during the day, when i am wearing my work clothes with my hand bag- i will be severly turned off if my hubby whips out his whip and wanting to whip me with it. That would be out of context and bizarre!


But my curiousity is---When sex was first invented---was it deseigned to work properly by two opposite participants? One dorminat and strong, and the other submissive and weak? What is it in our programmed brains that make sex amazing by one one total dom and the other total sub? Like for example angry make up sex- why is sooo amazing or extraordinary? Romantics would want to call it "Passion" but i think it is far deeper than that. I think it is about violance and power. One has the power and the other is powerless. A complete order. Without these two components there is only disorderly dull sex.In the old homo sapiens days-- men were visually strong. Muscular, bearded, strong manly ordour, and women the opposite. Since then ,man has evolved into a more meek,gentile metro sexual creature, with slimness, no muscles, shaved beard, and less testestrones. So essentially, they r only Man by virtue of their hearts desire, which interestingly enough had not changed. They are left with masculine creative mind--that wants the woman to do weird rituals so he can feel strong and manly and therefore have a maximum performance.Thats why bondage later existed. Each sex wanted to execise their biological right. One to dorminate and the other to be beaten, cry, and therefore truly submit and delude or deceive the Man that he is ...."the Man".

Of course upon orgasm the side effects of the beating is regretful.

This is so very very wrong

fOXY??? You have an opinion too??? What is so very very wrong about it? Do u guys have trouble expressing your opinions or feelings? I am buffled here.

You typing the word sex is simply very very wrong.

Mikey.@loool Mikey at what point were u made speechless? By my theory of the invention of the sexual roles or my so called according to Gatsby confession of harmless beating?




LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLFoxy i love u

I wonder what does Voltage think of my above theory, Vo huh? I know u have read it.