SomaliNet Forums

kambuli wrote:Waa loo qayiley Alla yaa yidhaahda ha is bi'inina

seemeyer wrote:^
Me follow you I only gotta say Condaleeza and you come running bilaa dhar to defend her
F#cking nasaq

"I speak good English"

union wrote:God strengthen the secular institutions of all the Arab countries and keep the radical horde at bay.

seemeyer wrote:^

Wuxu meesha la yimid eega,

"I speak good English"

What do you want a purple heart off your master,fraid you gonna have to go I-raq for that Caasha

I didn't know speaking articulately was something to be ashamed of?

seemeyer wrote:

I didn't know speaking articulately was something to be ashamed of?

I didn't say it was,it's just that you seem to mention it at every oppotunity
Like you just finished your ESL course.

seemeyer wrote:

I didn't know speaking articulately was something to be ashamed of?

I didn't say it was,it's just that you seem to mention it at every opportunity
Like you just finaly completed your ESL course.

union wrote:

seemeyer wrote:

I didn't know speaking articulately was something to be ashamed of?

I didn't say it was,it's just that you seem to mention it at every oppotunity
Like you just finished your ESL course.

And I shall keep mentioning it until I shame you into learning how to write properly. And for someone who takes every opportunity to insult my intelligence, it reflects badly upon you when you type like a third grader.

abdi.ismail wrote:

seemeyer wrote:

I didn't know speaking articulately was something to be ashamed of?

I didn't say it was,it's just that you seem to mention it at every opportunity
Like you just finaly completed your ESL course.

I've come to notice that the only people who are obsessed with grammar and spelling are freshies who'd learnt english yesterday. They think english is a holy language.

I've come to notice that the only people who are obsessed with grammar and spelling are freshies who'd learnt english yesterday. They think english is a holy language.

seemeyer wrote: Typical head f#cked Negro,I put more of an effort to learn my own lingo Somali
And for someone who takes every opprtunity to defend Condaleeza and boast of speaking English shows just how pathetic you are

seemeyer wrote:

I didn't know speaking articulately was something to be ashamed of?

I didn't say it was,it's just that you seem to mention it at every opportunity
Like you just finaly completed your ESL course.

union wrote:

seemeyer wrote: Typical head f#cked Negro,I put more of an effort to learn my own lingo Somali
And for someone who takes every opprtunity to defend Condaleeza and boast of speaking English shows just how pathetic you are

I am pathetic?

You're the son of a colonial toilet scrubber. You are 32 years old and can't write properly, and your English comprehension skills are lacking too. You constantly praise Sillyland, the third world slum your little iddor tribes comes from, but you still cling onto the UK passport as if it were gold. You don't have even a basic understanding of biology, and you spend 99% of your time hating on America, a country that couldn't give two shits what you think. I may be pathetic, but your certainly are not any less so.

abdisamad3 wrote:

union wrote:

abdisamad3 wrote:btw union how did the birds evolve to the way they are today..did they evolve to birds then start laying eggs or did they first evolve to eggs and then hatch to birds.
and how can you prove this do you have any clear evidence to back this up with or is it the usual bullshit theory with no real proves to back you up.now lets if you gonna avoid me this time as usual when ever I ask you some hard questions you cant answer.

http://articles.cnn.com/2006-05-26/tech ... _s=PM:TECH

Now, it's my turn to ask you some questions. Can you provide any "clear evidence" that man was created from potters clay. Preferably scientific.

first you need to answer my question..you cant answer a question with a question you dummy..

abdisamad3 wrote:seemayer this is his answer to my question...great scientist indeed..

It's a question that has baffled scientists, academics and pub bores through the ages: What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Now a team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.

Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.

Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.

Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.

The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said.

"Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg," he added. "So, I would conclude that the egg came first."

The same conclusion was reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns.

Mr Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science, agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and that proves there were chicken eggs before chickens.

He told PA people were mistaken if they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-chicken" bird parents.

"I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," he said.

"If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg."

Bourns, chairman of trade body Great British Chicken, said he was also firmly in the pro-egg camp.

He said: "Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. Of course, they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today, but they were eggs."

The debate, which may come as a relief to those with argumentative relatives, was organized by Disney to promote the release of the film "Chicken Little" on DVD

This is his scientific prove........