Marrying ahlul kitaab?

[Shirib]

debating? you're a troll kid, besides why the name change?

How am I a troll when I say that a Somali person has every right to marry who ever they want?

And I did not change my name. I am a new member. My room mate told me to check this website out.

well here's the thing, u coulda just said that, but u didn't. U went and attacked a member because of their opinion, and considering you're new, it makes you look like a troll.

[migdan]

debating? you're a troll kid, besides why the name change?

How am I a troll when I say that a Somali person has every right to marry who ever they want?

And I did not change my name. I am a new member. My room mate told me to check this website out.

well here's the thing, u coulda just said that, but u didn't. U went and attacked a member because of their opinion, and considering you're new, it makes you look like a troll.

I didn't attack any member. I countered their arguments. There is a big difference between the two.

Banning someone, however, for their opinion, is an attack. An attack on free speech and an attack on peaceful debate and conversation.

[LobsterUnit]

Sheikh Umal was recently asked this. He said Ulemagive three conditions:

1. That the women is a proper christian and has good morals,
2. that you don't live in a non muslim dominated society whereby you will run into problems in terms of child service and rights when/if problems arise
3. I can't remember the third one.

[Shirib]

I didn't attack any member. I countered their arguments. There is a big difference between the two.

Banning someone, however, for their opinion, is an attack. An attack on free speech and an attack on peaceful debate and conversation.

really u went on to implying he was a hypocrite, called him useless among other things and its your first day here.

So while you're at it, u coulda answered the question without ever involving all that

[migdan]

I didn't attack any member. I countered their arguments. There is a big difference between the two.

Banning someone, however, for their opinion, is an attack. An attack on free speech and an attack on peaceful debate and conversation.

really u went on to implying he was a hypocrite, called him useless among other things and its your first day here.

So while you're at it, u coulda answered the question without ever involving all that

Calling someone a hypocrite is not an attack. Secondly, I said I worded my words wrong and I stated this already. Thirdly, there are many people who attack other people's clans and they have not been addressed. Please address those people before you come after me for expressing my opinion (which I know a good number of people on here would love to do but risk being attacked by people and even being banned).

[migdan]

I didn't attack any member. I countered their arguments. There is a big difference between the two.

Banning someone, however, for their opinion, is an attack. An attack on free speech and an attack on peaceful debate and conversation.

really u went on to implying he was a hypocrite, called him useless among other things and its your first day here.

So while you're at it, u coulda answered the question without ever involving all that

You are just coming after me because of my personal views and that is wrong and unfair.

[Samatr]

So it's safe to say atheist girls are no no?