Zingi, what is wrong with somali federation states choosing their leader, just like the malaysians, even some states in malaysia have their own sultans, but one over all leader is in my opinion that thing that elimniates the cuqdad, we know somalis like to boast we are self ruled etc.......zingii wrote:Teeri:
Dont federations have one head that acts as the top dowg who represents
them?
If so does it really make any difference because at the end of the day someone
has to act as the head of the combined states to voice their needs and wants to
the rest of the world.
if any state wishes to break out, let them.. if the somalilands want to break out let them, why not?
this somaliland region is very dry, its so dry the Absames left it to seek green lands in todays Ogadenia, we know this, when my ancestors came to Jubbas and the NFD, they named areas like Garrisa and Hargesa yare in the Absame lands of the south,, yet both areas were in waaqoyi, the point is these idoors are very proud of this dry land, they are happy, fighting for it is not even worth it. somalia will not gain anything, economically and it will bitter hate for future wars,
about the sea access to gulf of eden, we demand somalilands independce is on the condition that dhulbahante and warsanglis lands remains with us, its better that idoors dont claim dhulbahante lands, because they are surrounded by darood lands, if they dont solve this issue, this could create the seed for future conflict. Majertein for example might watch dhulbahante on their own, but trust me if Ogadenia becomes independent tomorrow, the first thing they will do is do something about their dhulo cousins. so its better for the mostly idoor populated regions to became somaliland. infact, i would even advice them to leave awdal alone, because awadal could tomorrow bring instability, for gadabursi wishes to decide his future himself just like the idoor.
we can also create something similar to an economic union, we get the several states to join a somali economic union, like Europe, what we could not achieve by war can be achieved by economic means. you will see the idoors apply for membership to join our union.... we need to turn peroblems into advanatges.
like the example of Canada....... the British side populated by english, irish scotish etc, is autonomous from the french side, the only thing they came together is when deciding war, but what most people dont know is there are actual islands of the Canadian coast owned by France, yet they trade and no visa is required when traveling between them and Canada proper, its been like this since 1763.
create an economic union were any group can leave at anytime, the idoors low population, lack of rivers, dry lands etc will make them seek membership because of the big population, better division of labour, one language, culture , religion, resources of the south and the center, ports and other infrastructures etc
if i was Siyad barre in the 70s, i would have advocated this policy..... allow every somali ego group to know he is not being kept by force, no excuse of darood ruling them etc, and rather then trying to get into a destructive 4 year war with Ogadens as he tried giving Afmadow and kismayo to MR, i would have given them some lands in shabbele hoose, rich green lands, rather then losing everything on that war and being kicked back to gedo.


