I just called off my first and only shift

[Nanees]

why the hell is grandpa still following me around warya i blocked you, i cant see your posts

[Based]

The ideals of Marx were betrayed by the Leninist-Stalinist dogs.

The final stage of Communism was meant to be a stateless/classless society, but the Bolshevik rogues hijacked those noble ideals and installed a perpetual dictatorship of the proletariat that was only Communist in name. While the old bourgeoisie was overthrown, the Nomenklatura only replaced them in the hierarchy whilst paying lip service to the original ideals of Marx. The so called communist regimes can be more accurately described as degenerated workers' states, especially after the liquidation of the Trotskyites.

Anarchists believe the state to be an inherently oppressive system, an artificial concept that limits our freedoms and seeks only to benefit the elites of society while exploiting the masses. We share the same ends as the Marxists, but we disagree vehemently on the means to that end.

Our economic policies are somewhat different as well. We believe in volunteer associations and cooperatives, while ending the oppressive capitalist system that was enforced by the state. Any economic system based on wage labor and private property requires a coercive state apparatus to enforce property rights and to maintain unequal economic relationships that inevitably arise from differences in wages or amount of property, thus we also believe in the abolition of private property. Production and consumption would be entirely self-regulated, and all would own the means of production. It's the closest thing to the ideal of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"

[union]

Union,

We think alike. I doubted you. You are an amazing man

Good to know I'm not the only one proudly without integrity.

[IRONm@N]

Somalis have poor work and school ethics.

they never punctual.

[Sealion]

speaking of jobs, I'm excited about moving to this new site coming monday, insha allah hopefully it will be great; i don't call sick (hamdulilah) and I'm hardly late

Ive never called off or called in to a single shift before and Ive just done that i'm a bit scared

its a holiday season, your employer will understand

Good luck! You work construction or something?

I screwed up whallahi I graduated in June and didn't look for a job or internship right away because I I spend five years in uni
doing full fall/winter/and summer course loads back to back and wanted some time off. Most of my work experiences have been year long volunteer positions with charities/non-profits.
I haven't been able to find anything in that field but a shitty job so far. I'm super bummed, I'm going to be applying for grad school/law school this upcoming cycle. Had dinner with one of my professors and his wife they really pepped me up.

[Alphanumeric]

The ideals of Marx were betrayed by the Leninist-Stalinist dogs.

The final stage of Communism was meant to be a stateless/classless society, but the Bolshevik rogues hijacked those noble ideals and installed a perpetual dictatorship of the proletariat that was only Communist in name. While the old bourgeoisie was overthrown, the Nomenklatura only replaced them in the hierarchy whilst paying lip service to the original ideals of Marx. The so called communist regimes can be more accurately described as degenerated workers' states, especially after the liquidation of the Trotskyites.

Anarchists believe the state to be an inherently oppressive system, an artificial concept that limits our freedoms and seeks only to benefit the elites of society while exploiting the masses. We share the same ends as the Marxists, but we disagree vehemently on the means to that end.

Our economic policies are somewhat different as well. We believe in volunteer associations and cooperatives, while ending the oppressive capitalist system that was enforced by the state. Any economic system based on wage labor and private property requires a coercive state apparatus to enforce property rights and to maintain unequal economic relationships that inevitably arise from differences in wages or amount of property, thus we also believe in the abolition of private property. Production and consumption would be entirely self-regulated, and all would own the means of production. It's the closest thing to the ideal of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"

Although I agree with the notion that Marxism has been hijacked, you seem to still be stuck in the mindset that the state must exist. Otherwise, I see no possible way to guarantee that "all would own the means of production" nor a method for "the abolition of private property". Anarchism as you've described, is not anarchism. To force a hand to do or refrain from an act, implies overbearing laws and systems. Seems just as oppressive as any other ideology. If one chooses to work for a wage he feels will allow him to accumulate wealth given his living standards, who is to say that he must not or cannot do this? Who is to say private property is, in a sense, illegal? This is the State.

State intervention is the only method to assure the execution of what you've presented. Any ideal that guarantees anything is a system requiring enforcement. Abolishing wealth and property, or to guarantee an equal amount for all is both senseless and impossible. The State exists simply to maintain a population size and efficiency. The State allows for coercion and monopolization in order to guarantee a manageable, drudging, and reliant populous. Without coercion and monopolization, the State would be overthrown by those who seek wealth through any means and to no ends. The State continues to exist through taxing the wages and properties of the masses for the assumed guarantee of protection of liberties. Yet, it is the State that is the greatest enemy of liberties. We run to the hand that beats us.

The accumulation of wealth is an inevitable and undeniable necessity for self-reliance and existence. It is the State that has tarnished its good nature.

Anarcho-capitalism.

[Xamud.]

You guys are lazy mofos, I never call in sick, once I got into a physical confrontation(Not my fault) at work and they gave me a day off, that`s about it. I once worked 3 months with no a single day off, 7 days a week, it almost killed so I had to take 2 weeks off and go on a well deserved holiday.

[XaliimoFarax]

You guys are lazy mofos, I never call in sick, once I got into a physical confrontation(Not my fault) at work and they gave me a day off, that`s about it. I once worked 3 months with no a single day off, 7 days a week, it almost killed so I had to take 2 weeks off and go on a well deserved holiday.

This is why guys should work. Still shocked.

Whats sick leave for? I finish mine the first few months of the year and the rest I use my annual leave.

[BlackVelvet]

Does that mean you called in sick?

[greenday]

I dont call sick and i could never fake to get off when i need a day off i ask to swap shif with a friend

[Basra-]

Nannees

I know your feelings hon. I have been stress free for 2 years now. Being unemployed is a miracle and therapy for the brain walaahi. I can guarantee u that -- me being off work for two years has contributed to a heathy brain. If i had to do a brain MRI scan-- the doctors will declare a miracle. Good luck on being fired Nanny!

[Jaidi]

fighter

Also do it for exams too. Why sit in a class writing an exam with your classmates and with your prof watching your every move when you can write it a week later in a room all by yourself with all the information in your phone?



People need to realize not to let work, life and school screw you. We need to screw them

Fighter your from Ottawa right....We might have the same family doctor

[Based]

The ideals of Marx were betrayed by the Leninist-Stalinist dogs.

The final stage of Communism was meant to be a stateless/classless society, but the Bolshevik rogues hijacked those noble ideals and installed a perpetual dictatorship of the proletariat that was only Communist in name. While the old bourgeoisie was overthrown, the Nomenklatura only replaced them in the hierarchy whilst paying lip service to the original ideals of Marx. The so called communist regimes can be more accurately described as degenerated workers' states, especially after the liquidation of the Trotskyites.

Anarchists believe the state to be an inherently oppressive system, an artificial concept that limits our freedoms and seeks only to benefit the elites of society while exploiting the masses. We share the same ends as the Marxists, but we disagree vehemently on the means to that end.

Our economic policies are somewhat different as well. We believe in volunteer associations and cooperatives, while ending the oppressive capitalist system that was enforced by the state. Any economic system based on wage labor and private property requires a coercive state apparatus to enforce property rights and to maintain unequal economic relationships that inevitably arise from differences in wages or amount of property, thus we also believe in the abolition of private property. Production and consumption would be entirely self-regulated, and all would own the means of production. It's the closest thing to the ideal of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"

Although I agree with the notion that Marxism has been hijacked, you seem to still be stuck in the mindset that the state must exist. Otherwise, I see no possible way to guarantee that "all would own the means of production" nor a method for "the abolition of private property". Anarchism as you've described, is not anarchism. To force a hand to do or refrain from an act, implies overbearing laws and systems. Seems just as oppressive as any other ideology. If one chooses to work for a wage he feels will allow him to accumulate wealth given his living standards, who is to say that he must not or cannot do this? Who is to say private property is, in a sense, illegal? This is the State.

State intervention is the only method to assure the execution of what you've presented. Any ideal that guarantees anything is a system requiring enforcement. Abolishing wealth and property, or to guarantee an equal amount for all is both senseless and impossible. The State exists simply to maintain a population size and efficiency. The State allows for coercion and monopolization in order to guarantee a manageable, drudging, and reliant populous. Without coercion and monopolization, the State would be overthrown by those who seek wealth through any means and to no ends. The State continues to exist through taxing the wages and properties of the masses for the assumed guarantee of protection of liberties. Yet, it is the State that is the greatest enemy of liberties. We run to the hand that beats us.

The accumulation of wealth is an inevitable and undeniable necessity for self-reliance and existence. It is the State that has tarnished its good nature.

Anarcho-capitalism.

Anarcho-capitalism is a contradiction in terms. Capitalism is an inherently authoritarian and hierarchical system, and any wealth accumulation as a result of oppressive and exploitative wage slavery runs contrary to the very principles of anarchy. Despite being in conflict with the state, I acknowledge its role in actually limiting the power of corporations who would otherwise be free to engage in harmful business practices solely for profit. You would replace the state with the very bourgeois masters we seek to free ourselves from, in essence replacing one oppressor for another.

We believe that liberty without socialism is privilege and injustice, and that socialism without liberty is slavery and brutality. We believe in volunteer associations run on the principles of direct democracy, without coercion or force. Individuals have the right of disassociation, differing us from the so called Marxists. The means of production do not belong to any individuals, but must be shared equitably by all. "Private" property is theft legitimized, painting the bosses who accumulate their wealth through the exploitation of workers as legitimate proprietors.

Anarcho-communism is the future

[fighter]

fighter

Also do it for exams too. Why sit in a class writing an exam with your classmates and with your prof watching your every move when you can write it a week later in a room all by yourself with all the information in your phone?



People need to realize not to let work, life and school screw you. We need to screw them

Fighter your from Ottawa right....We might have the same family doctor

the city that raised me. my old doc did the same thing, lets just my old ottawa doc is somewhere near billings bridge

[fighter]

The ideals of Marx were betrayed by the Leninist-Stalinist dogs.

The final stage of Communism was meant to be a stateless/classless society, but the Bolshevik rogues hijacked those noble ideals and installed a perpetual dictatorship of the proletariat that was only Communist in name. While the old bourgeoisie was overthrown, the Nomenklatura only replaced them in the hierarchy whilst paying lip service to the original ideals of Marx. The so called communist regimes can be more accurately described as degenerated workers' states, especially after the liquidation of the Trotskyites.

Anarchists believe the state to be an inherently oppressive system, an artificial concept that limits our freedoms and seeks only to benefit the elites of society while exploiting the masses. We share the same ends as the Marxists, but we disagree vehemently on the means to that end.

Our economic policies are somewhat different as well. We believe in volunteer associations and cooperatives, while ending the oppressive capitalist system that was enforced by the state. Any economic system based on wage labor and private property requires a coercive state apparatus to enforce property rights and to maintain unequal economic relationships that inevitably arise from differences in wages or amount of property, thus we also believe in the abolition of private property. Production and consumption would be entirely self-regulated, and all would own the means of production. It's the closest thing to the ideal of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"

Although I agree with the notion that Marxism has been hijacked, you seem to still be stuck in the mindset that the state must exist. Otherwise, I see no possible way to guarantee that "all would own the means of production" nor a method for "the abolition of private property". Anarchism as you've described, is not anarchism. To force a hand to do or refrain from an act, implies overbearing laws and systems. Seems just as oppressive as any other ideology. If one chooses to work for a wage he feels will allow him to accumulate wealth given his living standards, who is to say that he must not or cannot do this? Who is to say private property is, in a sense, illegal? This is the State.

State intervention is the only method to assure the execution of what you've presented. Any ideal that guarantees anything is a system requiring enforcement. Abolishing wealth and property, or to guarantee an equal amount for all is both senseless and impossible. The State exists simply to maintain a population size and efficiency. The State allows for coercion and monopolization in order to guarantee a manageable, drudging, and reliant populous. Without coercion and monopolization, the State would be overthrown by those who seek wealth through any means and to no ends. The State continues to exist through taxing the wages and properties of the masses for the assumed guarantee of protection of liberties. Yet, it is the State that is the greatest enemy of liberties. We run to the hand that beats us.

The accumulation of wealth is an inevitable and undeniable necessity for self-reliance and existence. It is the State that has tarnished its good nature.

Anarcho-capitalism.

Anarcho-capitalism is a contradiction in terms. Capitalism is an inherently authoritarian and hierarchical system, and any wealth accumulation as a result of oppressive and exploitative wage slavery runs contrary to the very principles of anarchy. Despite being in conflict with the state, I acknowledge its role in actually limiting the power of corporations who would otherwise be free to engage in harmful business practices solely for profit. You would replace the state with the very bourgeois masters we seek to free ourselves from, in essence replacing one oppressor for another.

We believe that liberty without socialism is privilege and injustice, and that socialism without liberty is slavery and brutality. We believe in volunteer associations run on the principles of direct democracy, without coercion or force. Individuals have the right of disassociation, differing us from the so called Marxists. The means of production do not belong to any individuals, but must be shared equitably by all. "Private" property is theft legitimized, painting the bosses who accumulate their wealth through the exploitation of workers as legitimate proprietors.

Anarcho-communism is the future

It just gets weirder