It makes sense, at least for a time.Perfect_Order wrote:Alimony is part of Islam. In the shafi'i madhab you have to support your ex I forget the conditions. somalis obviously heard it first in the West
FAH1223 wrote:I read that in some states, if a man owns property and then gets married and raises his own kids in that property it can be taken away from him in the event of divorce. And it's HIS house, his name on it.Jasmine6 wrote:
![]()
What is said and how you understand it...you are really shook breh
My pops friend is going through a divorce right now, and my dad went to court with him numerous times. Let me just tell you this......grown men break down in tears and cry like little babies after the court was done with them.
shyts purely demonic breh



Well let's break it down.
The kids should not be uprooted, therefore they live in the same house. The primary care taker therefore also lives in that house. You wanted her to be a stay at home mum (for argument's sake) therefore how is she supposed to afford the mortgage repayment? Mwahahahaha damn this is kinda evil. You pay the mortgage and your rent shit, LMAO well that's one to ensure you never get married more than once
To be honest it is unfair when taken to that extent however a single mother with X number of kids is also not a good look. Courts blatantly favouring one over the other is also not fair.
But I stick by my earlier assertion, not talking about what happens if you get divorced is a risk not worth taking, especially as a man it seems.