Page 3 of 6

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 1:54 pm
by guulside
Timiro1999 wrote:
grandpakhalif wrote:Morgan is chilling in Garowe do something about it if you truly care
Imisa sano ayay Laascandhood JSL haysataa, 9 sanadood maxaad ka qaban kartaa!!!
Baqaaaaaq
lol timiro in full jihaad mode. good to see u in duty, the mujaahid title suits u perfectly.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:08 pm
by Geeljire252
X.Playa wrote: waar dadkaygu caqli xumaa. why do isaaq assume these crimes were committed by a reigion?? these crimes were not committed by southern Somalis these crimes were committed , orchestrated , coined and designed by a Daarood government and a Daarood rluer. why we blame the poor south??.

are the isaaq deliberately ignoring history for the short term of Somaliland case or are they programmed by their elite to equate war crimes with the South??
At least there is one Isaaq who gets it.
Even though you're a gaal you earned my respect more than your fellow landers like Xildiid who see the south as responsible for the dictatorship and what happened.
He just doesn't get the regime massacred us aswell.

:clap: :clap:

Wallahi we are not against you in any way. We are just against the people who blame us for what happened, which is just false and wrong.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 4:16 pm
by original dervish
Dhulbahante defeated the snm filth in 1990.....that's why LA was the only city that never fell to them.
They came back 20 years later "skinning & grinning" with suitcases of money. :)

It burns X players heart that his folks will never get revenge over us . :lol:
As for taking the land.....good luck with that. :up:

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 4:26 pm
by gegiroor
Lagaroone Ina-uurdoox aka Xaar.Player, inan-gumeed Hangool, and coward LeJusticier can do nothing to Dhulbahante and Warsangeli. Eviction kulahaa :lol:

The calaacal never stops.

The world came down to fag named Inna Uurdoox, who is well-known in Toronto and DC, is throwing around his nacnac day and night here.

I just wonder why don't these 3 losers - Xaar.Player, Hangool, and Lej - go to back home and do what they advocate online? It is usually the cowards and spineless who express endless ciil-qab and calaacal online!!

26 years have gone by and Inna - Uurdoox and his peers can't do anything to Tuke and others they hate. Typical inan-gumeed.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 4:54 pm
by hangool79
original dervish wrote:Dhulbahante defeated the snm filth in 1990.....that's why LA was the only city that never fell to them.
They came back 20 years later "skinning & grinning" with suitcases of money. :)

It burns X players heart that his folks will never get revenge over us . :lol:
As for taking the land.....good luck with that. :up:

your entire bakthi clan is under our occupation today, we own you qurjile.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:01 pm
by LeJusticier
Mohoka

listen sxb don't bring women here. My patience is about to run out. Just stick with the topic.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:08 pm
by X.Playa
gegiroor wrote:Lagaroone Ina-uurdoox aka Xaar.Player, inan-gumeed Hangool, and coward LeJusticier can do nothing to Dhulbahante and Warsangeli. Eviction kulahaa :lol:

The calaacal never stops.

The world came down to fag named Inna Uurdoox, who is well-known in Toronto and DC, is throwing around his nacnac day and night here.

I just wonder why don't these 3 losers - Xaar.Player, Hangool, and Lej - go to back home and do what they advocate online? It is usually the cowards and spineless who express endless ciil-qab and calaacal online!!

26 years have gone by and Inna - Uurdoox and his peers can't do anything to Tuke and others they hate. Typical inan-gumeed.

horta makhnnuudyow dhulbahnate ee buqdu dhashay maxaad meel kaste magaca libaaxa ina Uur Doox uga sheegtaa forumkan adoo dhaqankiinii ku caayaya Asharaaf aanad gaadhi Karin yaa ibnu zina.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:30 pm
by gegiroor
hangool79 wrote:
original dervish wrote:Dhulbahante defeated the snm filth in 1990.....that's why LA was the only city that never fell to them.
They came back 20 years later "skinning & grinning" with suitcases of money. :)

It burns X players heart that his folks will never get revenge over us . :lol:
As for taking the land.....good luck with that. :up:

your entire bakthi clan is under our occupation today, we own you qurjile.
Inangumeed Ciidagale, who is voiceless in SL, talking through his area. SL only exists few towns such as LA, Yagoori, and Adhicadeeye and nowhere else in Sool when your gaajo Ciidagale clan were forced to accept SL in 1993. The occupied and the voiceless calling others the occupied. The irony!

Calaacalka iyo cayda aad halkan la fadhidaan adiga iyo lagaroonaha Inna Uurdoox aka Xaar.Player waxba ku trimaysaan.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:36 pm
by X.Playa
gegiroor wrote:
hangool79 wrote:
original dervish wrote:Dhulbahante defeated the snm filth in 1990.....that's why LA was the only city that never fell to them.
They came back 20 years later "skinning & grinning" with suitcases of money. :)

It burns X players heart that his folks will never get revenge over us . :lol:
As for taking the land.....good luck with that. :up:

your entire bakthi clan is under our occupation today, we own you qurjile.
Inangumeed Ciidagale, who is voiceless in SL, talking through his area. SL only exists few towns such as LA, Yagoori, and Adhicadeeye and nowhere else in Sool when your gaajo Ciidagale clan were forced to accept SL in 1993. The occupied and the voiceless calling others the occupied. The irony!

Calaacalka iyo cayda aad halkan la fadhidaan adiga iyo lagaroonaha Inna Uurdoox aka Xaar.Player waxba ku trimaysaan.
horta afka kama soontid waadigan rag aanad weligaa arag ku leh khaniis iyo waxaas iyo inagumeed adoo forumkana ku shukaansada wax ma garatada " wadaad muslin ah baan ahay" waxan u malaynayaa reerka dhulbahnate afka kama soomaane futaday ka soomaan oo bisha ramadaan dabadooda ayuun baanu wax galin 11 ka kale na waa la cusbeeyaa , laakiin af xumadu iyo matago waa u xalaal.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:01 pm
by SahanGalbeed
As an Isaaq myself I cannot fathom an argument that proposes a retribution against a population along tribal lines who currently lives within the borders of Somaliland and which argument rejects any responsibility outside that specific tribal population . Why ?
Because
A/ It would create further chaos and bloodshed in Somaliland therefore destroy the current peace
B/ put an end the more sensible path of North vs South { to which I do not adhere but that make more sense given its historical colonial alignement} because the Daarood tribe lives in the North and in the South . Since we know that every tribe cannot have its own country and that the other non daarood tribes have no intention of letting go of certain parts of territorial Somalia .
Poorly thought through, not surprised there :lol:

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:04 pm
by SuldaanMaplesyrup
gegiroor wrote:Lagaroone Ina-uurdoox aka Xaar.Player, inan-gumeed Hangool, and coward LeJusticier can do nothing to Dhulbahante and Warsangeli. Eviction kulahaa :lol:

The calaacal never stops.

The world came down to fag named Inna Uurdoox, who is well-known in Toronto and DC, is throwing around his nacnac day and night here.

I just wonder why don't these 3 losers - Xaar.Player, Hangool, and Lej - go to back home and do what they advocate online? It is usually the cowards and spineless who express endless ciil-qab and calaacal online!!

26 years have gone by and Inna - Uurdoox and his peers can't do anything to Tuke and others they hate. Typical inan-gumeed.
Couldn't you have waited til after afur to vent your hatred? :umad:

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:37 pm
by X.Playa
what the Musi god takes a nap after the afur? what some crazy religion. why muslims assume every sin is ok after Ramadaan? or after afur? is your god a part time lover?

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:45 pm
by SuldaanMaplesyrup
X.Playa wrote:what the Musi god takes a nap after the afur? what some crazy religion. why muslims assume every sin is ok after Ramadaan? or after afur? is your god a part time lover?
You're right there shouldn't be a difference in behavior during and after Ramadan/fasting; but as you can see for individuals like gegiroor it's quite difficult balancing being a bitter clannist who wishes death and destruction for his rival, and being a practicing Muslim who believes in the betterment of the entire Ummah :mrgreen:

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:48 pm
by X.Playa
the amazing thing is some people buy his religious veneer out of sheer tribalism like our home munaafaq hyper, you should see them dancing the akhi and ukhti tango.

Re: The Isaaq failure to articulate and distinguish civil war from their statehood case

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:51 pm
by X.Playa
SahanGalbeed wrote:As an Isaaq myself I cannot fathom an argument that proposes a retribution against a population along tribal lines who currently lives within the borders of Somaliland and which argument rejects any responsibility outside that specific tribal population . Why ?
Because
A/ It would create further chaos and bloodshed in Somaliland therefore destroy the current peace
B/ put an end the more sensible path of North vs South { to which I do not adhere but that make more sense given its historical colonial alignement} because the Daarood tribe lives in the North and in the South . Since we know that every tribe cannot have its own country and that the other non daarood tribes have no intention of letting go of certain parts of territorial Somalia .
Poorly thought through, not surprised there :lol:

This guy doesn't get it, no fuckken isaaq listens to your shit , just quit this booty clapping. any isaaq takes this oromo daarood belly dancer seriously?? I know 90% of isaaqs don't buy or listen or care about your orphan opinion , shut the fak up for once.