Largest online Somali community!
http://somalinet.com/forums/
, Take it easy on em. dawwa9 wrote:^^
Hyper,
If I asked you this question: You are participating in a race. You overtake the second person. What position are you in?
You would probably answer, first, that’s how dumb you are. Based on your posts, you have the general knowledge equivalent to that of a dead rat.
The_Emperior5 wrote:
i was so f-king Shocked when i saw it
Mr. Yungnfresh wrote:dawwa9 wrote:^^
Hyper,
If I asked you this question: You are participating in a race. You overtake the second person. What position are you in?
You would probably answer, first, that’s how dumb you are. Based on your posts, you have the general knowledge equivalent to that of a dead rat.
Professor, you gramatically decimated that post in a manner that can only be described as tragically, ironically hilarious.
First of all, "If I asked you this question: You are participating in a race. You overtake the second person. What position are you in?" is not a question, it's a series of statements followed by a question. So you should have aptly put it "If I make two statements followed by a question...".
Secondly, "you overtake the second person" is a variation of a vague antecedent, since it's not entirely clear who this "second person" represents. Is it the individual who is in second place that you're overtaking? Or is it the second person you've overtaken thus far in the race?
Thirdly, the aforementioned statement is awkward and is a borderline sentence fragment as well. "You overtake the second person" does not represent a complete thought on it's own when it's independent of context. Someone who is well-versed in the syntax of the English language would have wrote it "If you're participating in a race and you overtake the runner in second-place, what position would you be in?".
Fourthly, your statment "You would probably answer, first, that’s how dumb you are" represents a monumental comma splice. There's no need for the first comma.
Lastly, "Based on your posts, you have the general knowledge equivalent to that of a dead rat" didn't really make sense either since it would have been sufficient to type "Based on your posts, your general knowledge is equivalent to that of a dead rat". "The general knowledge" is very "fobbish" (sic).
Your grasp of the lexicon of the English language is poor and you shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house yaa walad, especially one located in a region where the language you're critiquing is not the spoken vernacular.
Ka daa, malaha jar buu iska tuuriMr. Yungnfresh wrote:dawwa9 wrote:^^
Hyper,
If I asked you this question: You are participating in a race. You overtake the second person. What position are you in?
You would probably answer, first, that’s how dumb you are. Based on your posts, you have the general knowledge equivalent to that of a dead rat.
Professor, you gramatically decimated that post in a manner that can only be described as tragically, ironically hilarious.
First of all, "If I asked you this question: You are participating in a race. You overtake the second person. What position are you in?" is not a question, it's a series of statements followed by a question. So you should have aptly put it "If I make two statements followed by a question...".
Secondly, "you overtake the second person" is a variation of a vague antecedent, since it's not entirely clear who this "second person" represents. Is it the individual who is in second place that you're overtaking? Or is it the second person you've overtaken thus far in the race?
Thirdly, the aforementioned statement is awkward and is a borderline sentence fragment as well. "You overtake the second person" does not represent a complete thought on it's own when it's independent of context. Someone who is well-versed in the syntax of the English language would have wrote it "If you're participating in a race and you overtake the runner in second-place, what position would you be in?".
Fourthly, your statment "You would probably answer, first, that’s how dumb you are" represents a monumental comma splice. There's no need for the first comma.
Lastly, "Based on your posts, you have the general knowledge equivalent to that of a dead rat" didn't really make sense either since it would have been sufficient to type "Based on your posts, your general knowledge is equivalent to that of a dead rat". "The general knowledge" is very "fobbish" (sic).
Your grasp of the lexicon of the English language is poor and you shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house yaa walad, especially one located in a region where the language you're critiquing is not the spoken vernacular.
Voltage wrote:Mr. Yungnfresh wrote:dawwa9 wrote:^^
Hyper,
If I asked you this question: You are participating in a race. You overtake the second person. What position are you in?
You would probably answer, first, that’s how dumb you are. Based on your posts, you have the general knowledge equivalent to that of a dead rat.
Professor, you gramatically decimated that post in a manner that can only be described as tragically, ironically hilarious.
First of all, "If I asked you this question: You are participating in a race. You overtake the second person. What position are you in?" is not a question, it's a series of statements followed by a question. So you should have aptly put it "If I make two statements followed by a question...".
Secondly, "you overtake the second person" is a variation of a vague antecedent, since it's not entirely clear who this "second person" represents. Is it the individual who is in second place that you're overtaking? Or is it the second person you've overtaken thus far in the race?
Thirdly, the aforementioned statement is awkward and is a borderline sentence fragment as well. "You overtake the second person" does not represent a complete thought on it's own when it's independent of context. Someone who is well-versed in the syntax of the English language would have wrote it "If you're participating in a race and you overtake the runner in second-place, what position would you be in?".
Fourthly, your statment "You would probably answer, first, that’s how dumb you are" represents a monumental comma splice. There's no need for the first comma.
Lastly, "Based on your posts, you have the general knowledge equivalent to that of a dead rat" didn't really make sense either since it would have been sufficient to type "Based on your posts, your general knowledge is equivalent to that of a dead rat". "The general knowledge" is very "fobbish" (sic).
Your grasp of the lexicon of the English language is poor and you shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house yaa walad, especially one located in a region where the language you're critiquing is not the spoken vernacular.
dawwa9 wrote:Most of what he wrote is pure nonsense, other than the misuse of the definite article in front of 'General Knowledge'.
Yungnfresh, I challenge you to write just three sentences in proper Arabic without failing, let's see how far you get.
I don't mind at all, it’s still not a dumbfuck mistake most of you Anglophones make. It should be at least fact and not fictional. The guy basically only found one thing and blew all the others out of proportion.*Nobleman* wrote:See bro, its not so nice when you call people out somaha?
