The Taliban Mujahidin launch attacks in Kabul

[Grant]

I like the two-country solution, because it really does solve the problem. The whole country is landlocked, but with the minority tribes backing on allied populations in adjacent countries, supply is still possible.

Let the Pashtuns govern themselves any way they want. Just no empire.

My goodness! Did the goals of this war change?

[Hussein53]

Kabul operation ends after 20 hours of straight fighting: 69 foreign invaders and puppets killed
Publication time: Today at 22:03 Emirate time

KABUL, Sep. 14 - Kabul operation ends after two consecutive days of fighting and martyrdom operations conducted by 15 martyrdom-seeking Mujahideen of the Islamic Emirate targeting the most important points in the city such as NATO's HQ, US embassy, foreign and local intelligence agencies and some other government and military buildings, regiments and corps in the center of Kabul city, the capital of the country.

The first 6-men team led by Mula Abdurahman resident of Kandahar poisoned near the Sahat-e-Ama roundabout began targeting the US embassy, ISAF central headquarter, the department of National Directorate of Security (NDS), a local spy agency, Kabul main corps and other important government and military buildings using mortars, artilleries, rockets and heavy machine guns.

Meantime, Hafizullah carried out a martyrdom attack eliminating two military vehicles of the convoy of the reinforcement attempting to approach the war zone. At least more thane than 15 puppet soldiers were killed in the attack. Next, Abdul Shafi conducted a martyr attack on the military convoy of the regiment of 101 trying to break the operation in which several military vehicles and tanks of the local puppets and the US invaders were destroyed with more than 40 US invaders and the puppets being killed.

A third car bomb attack conducted by a remote-controlled device targeted the enemy forces intending to break into Mujahideen position.

The group of martyrdom-seeking Mujahideen hit all the targets and fought throughout the night, while the operation ended successfully on Wednesday at about 9: am local time, killing more that 69 US-NATO invader and their puppets including soldiers, policemen and spy agents. Of 15 martyrdom-seeking Mujahideen 6 left the area safely, where the other 9 became martyrs in face to face fighting and martyrdom attacks. No civilians have harmed during the operation.

The objectives:

- The move was to show the US, NATO and their allies that Mujahideen's resolve has not weakened through the 10-year long battle, on the contrary, it has strengthened and the morale among Mujahideen is higher than before.

- To make the spy agency and its agents of puppet regime suffer the consequences of what they have been doing to the innocent Muslims across the country especially the ones equipped with the Sunnah of the Prophet (pbuh) by harassing and intimidating them and extorting dollars as bribe from them.

Source: The Voice of Jihad

Kavkaz Center

source: http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content ... 5124.shtml


P.S
This has nothing to do with tribalism as some in here are trying to say and everything to do with ISLAM, the Taliban is an Islamic movement that intend to implement political Islam while the West lead by USA is trying to spread liberal democracy. This is proven by the fact that the Taliban have Chechens, turkish and arabs amongst there ranks even though the far majority are pashton. There is no collaboration between Taliban and Pakistani State except individual Pakistani muslims who sympathise with them because of deen. In fact there is an open war between the pakistani Taliban and the Pakistani State.

[ToughGong]

American Soldiers Cryng During a Mujahideen Attack

[934]

@Lord help us get out of here alright

Never though i'll hear Rambo crying let alone remember God

[Salahuddiin]

FAH, Cali Gaab, Sahan Galbeed and co.

So your problem is targeting local forces? In every single occupation that has happened in the history of the world (never read otherwise) there has always been traitors who help the occupiers for worldly gains or some other reasons and it will stay like that including Mongol sack of Baghdad, colonization of Muslim countries by European powers etc. Even in the time of Muhammad SCWS there were munaafiqiin inside Madina lead by Abdullah bin Saluul who were ready to support kuffaar if they would have succeeded in their wars. Same thing in nazi occupation of Europe and every other similar occupation. There is always local figurehead and local forces involved.

So how come targeting occupiers would be ok, but targeting those who fight along them would be wrong? Local police and army are armed and they are fighting resistance even more than occupiers. US came in, installed system and puppet regime that's serving their own needs and now wants to leave by training local people to fight for the system and regime they created. Even if those people joining the security forces would be Muslims that wouldn't make them any less legal target for resistance in Islamic or secular sense. Also before when Soviets occupied Afghanistan they also created large local security forces and lot if not most of the fighting was between them and mujaahidiin, just like today.

It's Islamic obligation for every single person of the area to fight against kaafir invaders and if those invaders get some so-called Muslims named Abdullah to help them it doesn't change the situation even one bit.

[ToughGong]

It's Islamic obligation for every single person of the area to fight against kaafir invaders and if those invaders get some so-called Muslims named Abdullah to help them it doesn't change the situation even one bit.

[SahanGalbeed]

Long gone are the days where the muslims were colonizing Europe and the europeans muslim countries , we're in 2012 .
The United States of America went in Afghanistan because this country has been attacked by a group that was given protection by the Afghan authorities of that time , namely the taliban .
The Taliban are not my brothers , okay ? I live in a world , a global inter connected world , where the intersecting lines are NOT Islam vs Christianity , okay ? If you provoke somebody expect him/her to answer you . Ask your friend hussein53 ,{ another clown to my immense embarrassment that says he is Isaaq }

THE FIRST PHASE: The Awakening

This was supposed to occur between 2000-2003. This phase is supposed to provoke the US to declare war on the Islamic world openly.

viewtopic.php?f=18&t=285352

[Hussein53]

Sahan GAAL

I am from a well Known ISSAQ family and I take pride in who I am. I don't need to prove anything to anyone and when I go back to my home Gogol Wanaag all the way to Ceel Shiekh, I am treated like a king in my degaan. My people control and run the water of hargeisa. My whole family know my opinions of Shabab and respect my decision and will defend me with their blood.

It is your pro USA opinions that are strange in Waqoyi and your pro secular (pro homo) way that is an embarrassment to our land. Our people LOVE ISLAM and its people and DISLIKE the Frangi and there gaalo ways.

Wallahi if I go back there I can become a DG of a region by the click of my fingers, but I wish something better for my people rather than bum licking the kufaar.

I AM THE SON OF GABAX and ADAN SHIINA the lions of Sacad Musa.

[ToughGong]

Hussain it's all well and fair to debate about this subject
It's also understandble to feel angry with Sahan.Laakiin inaadeer you should refrain from calling another muslim a kafir.Maybe Sahan truly believes his stance is the right one to take as a muslim and if that is the case show him proves pointing out the cotradiction as a muslim in that beleif.I mean I don't undertand it either.But at no time did he say he is gaal

It is reported on the authority of Ibn `Umar that the Prophet (may peace and blessings be upon him) said: Any person who calls his brother: O Unbeliever! (then the truth of this label) would return to one of them. If it is true, (then it is) as he asserted, (but if it is not true), then it returns to him (and thus the person who made the accusation is an Unbeliever). [Muslim]

[Hussein53]

You dont have to admit that you're a GAAL to become a GAAL.

If he talks like a GAAL, thinks like a GAAL and supports the GAALO then he can only be a GAAL unless he repents and changes his action.

Dont get me wrong I am not one of those people who are quick to call my people GAAL. You will find me to be the most loving, caring and helpful to my Somali people. I always rush to there aid.

Look he supports Secularism and believes this is better then Shariah of ALLAH.
He supports USA's world view and is happy and wishes them success.

That is like a man in the time of the messenger supporting the Kafir quraysh and wishing Abu Jahil to succeed and then still considering him muslim. By ALLAH he does not believe in ALLAH being supreme.

IF I AM INCORRECT THEN SAHAN MAKE YOURSELF CLEAR AS I HAVE ASKED YOU ON MANY OCCASIONS AND I WILL APOLOGISE.


P.S
Look you do not have to support Shabab or even Taliban to be muslim and many muslims do not support them and thats there chose.
But the muslim clearly believe ALLAH deen is the best way of life, and wish for the return of the Khalifah so they can live under it. SAHAN GALBED believes secular liberal democracy is better than Islam.

What made me come to this conclusion is when he came with anti Islam views and then when I ask him question to clarify his position he dodges the question. Which only left me to conclude that he is a devil in sheep's clothing. If I am wrong then correct me and I will quickly fix my words and make a full apology. AND I WISH I AM WRONG. Another reason why I concluded that this guy is a GAAL is because I told him ISLAM comes before TRIBE and he took that as a bad thing. So with that reaction he must believe clan comes before ISLAM.


I always thought every rer waqoyi was straight forward clear and avoided ambiguity, meaning if they believed in something they would openly proclaim it. However this Sahan is something else

[FAH1223]

Afghanistan is extremely complicated. Invaders never succeed there and the USA has failed because the USA thinks it is immune to history. I'm against the occupation and the puppets that have been installed.

The Taliban also isn't as unitary as Hussein points out. It's mostly dominated by the Pashtun and they use their Pashtunwali which has many contradictions with the Sharia of Allah SWT. I have a friend whose father was kidnapped by the Taliban (and later released) and he told us about how some of these Taliban prefer their own tribal laws to Sharia ESP with regards to women cause they see the Sharia as too liberal. Honor Killings are haram in Islam but it's part and parcel of Pashtunwali

لا حول ولا قوة الا بالله

[Hussein53]

It's mostly dominated by the Pashtun and they use their Pashtunwali which has many contradictions with the Sharia of Allah SWT. I have a friend whose father was kidnapped by the Taliban (and later released) and he told us about how some of these Taliban prefer their own tribal laws to Sharia ESP with regards to women cause they see the Sharia as too liberal. Honor Killings are haram in Islam but it's part and parcel of Pashtunwali

I think I agree with you on this one.

Also the concept of "if you kill my brother I will kill 10 of yours", which is a haram extreme form of qisas law in the quran.

[FAH1223]

It's mostly dominated by the Pashtun and they use their Pashtunwali which has many contradictions with the Sharia of Allah SWT. I have a friend whose father was kidnapped by the Taliban (and later released) and he told us about how some of these Taliban prefer their own tribal laws to Sharia ESP with regards to women cause they see the Sharia as too liberal. Honor Killings are haram in Islam but it's part and parcel of Pashtunwali

I think I agree with you on this one.

Also the concept of "if you kill my brother I will kill 10 of yours", which is a haram extreme form of qisas law in the quran.

Yessir...

[DropkickMurphy]

edit.

[LiquidHYDROGEN]

Afghanistan is extremely complicated. Invaders never succeed there and the USA has failed because the USA thinks it is immune to history. I'm against the occupation and the puppets that have been installed.

The Taliban also isn't as unitary as Hussein points out. It's mostly dominated by the Pashtun and they use their Pashtunwali which has many contradictions with the Sharia of Allah SWT. I have a friend whose father was kidnapped by the Taliban (and later released) and he told us about how some of these Taliban prefer their own tribal laws to Sharia ESP with regards to women cause they see the Sharia as too liberal. Honor Killings are haram in Islam but it's part and parcel of Pashtunwali

لا حول ولا قوة الا بالله

And the annoying thing is this the bit the gaalo like to propogate; lies like FGM, honour-killing, suicide bombing etc. are all part of islam.