
also I can see you matured, gone are the days of two liners, you holding great discussion here.
Moderator: Moderators
I think it's important to remember than any counter-insurgency that engages in collective punishment only strengthens the resolve of the people and forces what would otherwise be apathetic citizens into the liberation struggle. If collective punishment was not applied and the average citizen was not overly oppressed, the rebellion would not be as powerful and many would not view themselves as foreigners in what is ostensibly their own country. By the Ethiopian regimes actions in the Ogaden and in other regions, they have only fueled the fires of separatism by reinforcing the idea that all non-Xabash are colonial subjects that must be controlled by force. I suppose you could argue that the harsh military reprisals are a result of their insurgency, but I think it is better for the people to be conscious of their status as oppressed subjects whilst struggling against this oppression, rather than being apathetic subjects who have accepted their lot like many accuse the Oromo of being.yungnfresh wrote:Both are forms of oppression, albeit on differing scales of severity. The lesser form is denying them their right to self-determination...right now, they're subjected to that AND they're also the victims of carpet-bombing by the military in their offensive against the rebels. What I said was there's no incentive for them to use brutal force in the Somali regions in the absence of an armed rebellion...oppression through denial of sovereignty would still exist, but it's still the lesser of two evils.
You can say that development is disproportionate but you can't say it's exclusive to Adis and Tigray regions. Just look at Dire Dawa's, the Oromo capital, infrastructure and it's not much worse off than Adis. Ethiopia in general is a poor nation and the entire nation is underdeveloped. I'm not denying that Zenawi is corrupt...few African heads of state aren't. But what do you think serves the interest of the Somali people more...shiny buildings in a region where they have property rights and live under the rule of law, or continuing to become casualties caught in the crossfire in a low-intensity war between the military and rebels? By no means am I arguing it's the ideal resolution, but you gotta play the cards you're dealt and there comes a point where you have to realize you're outgunned and go back to the drawing board. What I'm advocating for is not having foolish pride and continuing to fight a war you can't win at the moment...Somalis in Kilinka 5aad would do well to instead explore other possible avenues to gaining sovereignty cuz the armed struggle is not and has not been working, so for the interim, they should value their livelihood and stop fighting a losing war where they have little more than a puncher's chance.
They in war with ONLF not Somalis? what are you talking about faggot? You surely don't know shit about Somali and you probably aint one.Based wrote:yungnfresh wrote: they're at war with the ONLF, not Somalis. If the ONLF left tomorrow, Somalida nabad bay heli lahaayeen (Meles Zenawi himself said "the rebels in the Ogaden are preventing the Somali citizens from achieving peace and development...if it weren't for them, you guys would be making use of your abundance of natural resources and your cities would be some of the most developed in Africa").