Because its a load of bullcrap, you cannot observe human intelligene by looking at a set of markers. Lets just say sub saharan markers indicate inferiority of some kind, we Somalis would have plenty of it. Ninyaho, you are wack, i cant believe someone who's 60% sub saharan african (more if you include basal eurasian) would think like this. I dont know why im speaking sense to you as you have clearly lost it.Itrah wrote:
Of course academicians will not study these kind of politically incorrect things.![]()
Yes and that is a 100,000 years old and is a daughter clade of the parent L which all humans are descended from. All it says is that may mean they have come into contact at such an early time.Not the Pygmies of today, but extinct ones. The large portion of L1b in West Africans is of Pygmy origin. You also find remnants of A1b only in West Africa. Archaic atDNA sequences are also detected from time to time. West Africans are probably a mixture between Pygmoids and proto-Nilotes.
Look at an fst diagram youll find that the distance between the two people is like the difference between Europeans and East Asians.