Salaaxley79 wrote:First off all Yalaxow we need to emphasise on the input as has been claimed in here by you that niqaab is a preIslamic tradition.
If we can conclude and find evidence on the real age of this product, its gonna help us understand how it silently entered us again as bidah
People arguing in favour of the niqab usually cite this ayah:
“And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms) and not to reveal their adornment except to their husbands, or their fathers, or their husband’s fathers, or their sons, or their husband’s sons, or their brothers or their brother’s sons, or their sister’s sons, or their (Muslim) women (i.e. their sisters in Islam), or the (female) slaves whom their right hands possess, or old male servants who lack vigour, or small children who have no sense of feminine sex. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. And all of you beg Allaah to forgive you all, O believers, that you may be successful”
[al-Noor 24:31]
Adornment being the key word, some regard the face as adornment, others dont. But you cant really argue it is bidah.