Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.

Somali Pharaonic/Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Somali Pharaonic/Faraacina History makes more sense
11
44%
No, I look more like those Arab guys wallahi
5
20%
We are neither Pharaonic/Cushitic nor Arab
9
36%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
king of kismayo
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:52 am

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by king of kismayo »

people are mixing alot of stuff, like 19 century european racial clasification which was partly a mixture of racism, science and things from the bibel.
people need to stop mixing modern dna classification and linguistic classification.

there is no such thing as custic race, that was a racist 19 century racist connotation.

linguistically

the Afroasiatic language family is grouped as followed:
Semitic languages, Egyptian language, Berber group, Chadic group, Cushitic group , Omotic group

as you can see the egyptian and Cushitic langauges are two separate branches in a wider language group.
there is no such thing as Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History or somali arab history but there is a somali horn of africa history

the Pharaonic history is not a somali history and arab history is not somali history, people need to stop bastardising our history and identity.
User avatar
abdisamad3
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 12628
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 10:18 am
Location: Kismayo

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by abdisamad3 »

king of kismayo wrote:people are mixing alot of stuff, like 19 century european racial clasification which was partly a mixture of racism, science and things from the bibel.
people need to stop mixing modern dna classification and linguistic classification.

there is no such thing as custic race, that was a racist 19 century racist connotation.

linguistically

the Afroasiatic language family is grouped as followed:
Semitic languages, Egyptian language, Berber group, Chadic group, Cushitic group , Omotic group

as you can see the egyptian and Cushitic langauges are two separate branches in a wider language group.
there is no such thing as Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History or somali arab history but there is a somali horn of africa history

the Pharaonic history is not a somali history and arab history is not somali history, people need to stop bastardising our history and identity.
well said..I dont get why this people just cant stick their own identity culture and history and be proud of it..I sense some inferior complexity when ever I see them claiming egpytian history.. :? :down:
talxenegus
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:10 pm

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by talxenegus »

IT has been genitically, culturalyand linguistically proven that the Darood can is Arab. Better yet it is Bani Haashim.
You are whatever your FATHER is and most Somalis come from a Arab man that married a beautiful East-african lady( since he had tast).
User avatar
Talo alle udaa
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:03 pm
Location: Evaluating the African mind

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by Talo alle udaa »

Marka ma waxaa la isku raacey in soomaalidu faraaciin yihiin, dhulka masarna uu yahay mid naga maqan?
grandpakhalif
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 30687
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:32 am
Location: Darul Kufr
Contact:

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by grandpakhalif »

ciyaal_warta wrote:
AwdalPrince wrote:





Arabs:

Image

عانبوا لخشم مرّه طووووووووووويل :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Monk-of-Mogadishu
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4962
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:06 pm
Location: The thought of gemini07 and her family getting rich sends chills down my spine

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by Monk-of-Mogadishu »

White people have confused everyone but this is how things really are:

The Egyptians weren't Kushites aka Nubians they just bordered and married them, the ancient Egyptian languages were a branch of their own although very distantly related to af-Somaali.

The Nubians were the KUSHITES, they spoke a language called Nubian which still exists today and Nubian is Nilo-Saharan, they are similar to DINKA & MASSAI.

Somali are a branch of people altogether on their own, nothing to do with any of these people. Accept it.

You are not mentioned in the history books because you're simply not part of it, accept that too. :mrgreen:
User avatar
DR-YALAXOOW
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 13991
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:26 am

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by DR-YALAXOOW »

grandpakhalif wrote:Image
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: diiiiq ayuu u eg yahay.
User avatar
ToughGong
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 15321
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:06 pm
Location: No Justice Just Us

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by ToughGong »

This Turkish guy is in the record books for his nose,but the one above woild give him a run for his money I bet

Image
User avatar
ciyaal_warta
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9629
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:58 pm
Location: Hiiraan State of Somalia

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by ciyaal_warta »

Firewall wrote:nooooooo.....If moses was albe to pass for an egyptian its safe to say that the ancient egyptians looked middle easterns :up:

Moses was unware of his ancestry during most of his life he always tought he was an egyptian prince :up:

u need to read da quran sxb..musa pbh was brought bk 2 his mom whn he was kid so she can breast feed him
User avatar
FAH1223
webmaster
Posts: 33838
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: THE MOST POWERFUL CITY IN THE WORLD
Contact:

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by FAH1223 »

ciyaal_warta wrote:
Firewall wrote:nooooooo.....If moses was albe to pass for an egyptian its safe to say that the ancient egyptians looked middle easterns :up:

Moses was unware of his ancestry during most of his life he always tought he was an egyptian prince :up:

u need to read da quran sxb..musa pbh was brought bk 2 his mom whn he was kid so she can breast feed him
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: someone watched the Prince of Egypt and thought they knew everything
User avatar
ciyaal_warta
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9629
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:58 pm
Location: Hiiraan State of Somalia

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History

Post by ciyaal_warta »

FAH1223 wrote:
ciyaal_warta wrote:
Firewall wrote:nooooooo.....If moses was albe to pass for an egyptian its safe to say that the ancient egyptians looked middle easterns :up:

Moses was unware of his ancestry during most of his life he always tought he was an egyptian prince :up:

u need to read da quran sxb..musa pbh was brought bk 2 his mom whn he was kid so she can breast feed him
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: someone watched the Prince of Egypt and thought they knew everything

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: LMAO
Locked
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”