Page 5 of 5
Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 7:52 am
by king of kismayo
people are mixing alot of stuff, like 19 century european racial clasification which was partly a mixture of racism, science and things from the bibel.
people need to stop mixing modern dna classification and linguistic classification.
there is no such thing as custic race, that was a racist 19 century racist connotation.
linguistically
the Afroasiatic language family is grouped as followed:
Semitic languages, Egyptian language, Berber group, Chadic group, Cushitic group , Omotic group
as you can see the egyptian and Cushitic langauges are two separate branches in a wider language group.
there is no such thing as Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History or somali arab history but there is a somali horn of africa history
the Pharaonic history is not a somali history and arab history is not somali history, people need to stop bastardising our history and identity.
Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 7:58 am
by abdisamad3
king of kismayo wrote:people are mixing alot of stuff, like 19 century european racial clasification which was partly a mixture of racism, science and things from the bibel.
people need to stop mixing modern dna classification and linguistic classification.
there is no such thing as custic race, that was a racist 19 century racist connotation.
linguistically
the Afroasiatic language family is grouped as followed:
Semitic languages, Egyptian language, Berber group, Chadic group, Cushitic group , Omotic group
as you can see the egyptian and Cushitic langauges are two separate branches in a wider language group.
there is no such thing as Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History or somali arab history but there is a somali horn of africa history
the Pharaonic history is not a somali history and arab history is not somali history, people need to stop bastardising our history and identity.
well said..I dont get why this people just cant stick their own identity culture and history and be proud of it..I sense some inferior complexity when ever I see them claiming egpytian history..

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 1:15 pm
by talxenegus
IT has been genitically, culturalyand linguistically proven that the Darood can is Arab. Better yet it is Bani Haashim.
You are whatever your FATHER is and most Somalis come from a Arab man that married a beautiful East-african lady( since he had tast).
Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 3:29 pm
by Talo alle udaa
Marka ma waxaa la isku raacey in soomaalidu faraaciin yihiin, dhulka masarna uu yahay mid naga maqan?
Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:12 pm
by grandpakhalif
Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:52 pm
by Monk-of-Mogadishu
White people have confused everyone but this is how things really are:
The Egyptians weren't Kushites aka Nubians they just bordered and married them, the ancient Egyptian languages were a branch of their own although very distantly related to af-Somaali.
The Nubians were the KUSHITES, they spoke a language called Nubian which still exists today and Nubian is Nilo-Saharan, they are similar to DINKA & MASSAI.
Somali are a branch of people altogether on their own, nothing to do with any of these people. Accept it.
You are not mentioned in the history books because you're simply not part of it, accept that too.

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:56 pm
by DR-YALAXOOW
Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:02 pm
by ToughGong
This Turkish guy is in the record books for his nose,but the one above woild give him a run for his money I bet

Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:58 pm
by ciyaal_warta
Firewall wrote:nooooooo.....If moses was albe to pass for an egyptian its safe to say that the ancient egyptians looked middle easterns
Moses was unware of his ancestry during most of his life he always tought he was an egyptian prince :up:
u need to read da quran sxb..musa pbh was brought bk 2 his mom whn he was kid so she can breast feed him
Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:31 am
by FAH1223
ciyaal_warta wrote:Firewall wrote:nooooooo.....If moses was albe to pass for an egyptian its safe to say that the ancient egyptians looked middle easterns
Moses was unware of his ancestry during most of his life he always tought he was an egyptian prince :up:
u need to read da quran sxb..musa pbh was brought bk 2 his mom whn he was kid so she can breast feed him

someone watched the Prince of Egypt and thought they knew everything
Re: Somali Pharaonic Cushitic History VS Somali Arab History
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:21 pm
by ciyaal_warta