SomaliNet Forums

ah says the smooth thin handed Arsitocartic British fair maiden . what is there to refute my fair lady?

Aristocat wrote:Voltage what do you seek to achieve by refuting this drink-sodden pseudo-historian and his herd of illiterate buffoons.
Is it perhaps for them to fully read the book and to contextualize its contents before rewriting history.!

It would be selfish of me not to share the wealth of information researched on the history of the Somali people. It is also intellectualism on my side---to remind one of the jurisprudence of academic research and the interpretetion of it as well as the appropriate commentation of it.

Juxtoposing a correlation from thin air simply on the premise of a book's title just does not do. Well unless you are functionally illiterate.

X.Playa wrote:ah says the smooth thin handed Arsitocartic British fair maiden . what is there to refute my fair lady?

I have no time for conspicuous charlatan, who is soo transparently fraudulent. Your theology of historical liberation and cultural emancipation may be appealing to your herd of wildebeests but there is no veracity to your drunken fantasy. Copying and pasting random search from google is something worth refuting your flatheaded poseur

My fair lady you are too emotional for any debate and yet you nag me all the time , my fair lady has tow choices either to shut her both holes , or to engage and let out what has been bothering her for so long.

The`Republic wrote:

Aristocat wrote:Voltage what do you seek to achieve by refuting this drink-sodden pseudo-historian and his herd of illiterate buffoons.
Is it perhaps for them to fully read the book and to contextualize its contents before rewriting history.!

It would be selfish of me not to share the wealth of information researched on the history of the Somali people. It is also intellectualism on my side---to remind one of the jurisprudence of academic research and the interpretetion of it as well as the appropriate commentation of it.

Juxtoposing a correlation from thin air simply on the premise of a book's title just does not do. Well unless you are functionally illiterate.

I can appreciate that.
This reminds of a thread you were involved the other day on this section. Where one of the more intelligent members of the herd, copied and pasted a search from google on 'bon marexaan' in order to insult. He highlighted and circled a bon marexaan sentence and posted with utter satisfaction, honour and pride with realising that next sentence contradicted his thesis and completely made the opposite point. Lool.

X.Playa wrote:My fair lady you are too emotional for any debate and yet you nag me all the time , my fair lady has tow choices either to shut her both holes , or to engage and let out what has been bothering her for so long.

Buddy i have read almost every book you randomly quote from your google searches from the darwiish, to the topic on hand and i have read your threads. And trust me mate you are not worth debating, may you are worth educating but first you have to sober up and learn to read a complete book, rathering copying and pasting sentences from google

Lol Aristocrat you must be talking about where Siciid made my point about Bon Marehan being the posessed or slaves and servants which the same article he posted (because it contained the name "Bon Marehan") in the next sentence explained it was in fact the servants and slaves to the clan. That one is harmless--not an intellectual bone in his body. The majority of what he runs with are google snippet views. If you shout hard enough, you sully the well--that's his tactic. It's bankrupt for people like me and frankly the worst thing you can do to a man is not respect him even if you don't like him. I am apathetic about him.

As for Xplaya I actually like him even though everything he posts is to counter some supra-Darod mythical historical control. Xplaya shows signs of intellectualism and I admire and respect him in that scope. If you are going to be learned start with genuine intellectual curiosity and he certainly shows that.

I can write an entire book on how the Kacaan and its Daarood "histroian" hijacked somali history and turne it into Daarood barvado , from Shire Jaamac of 1960's to Abdi Sheikh Abdi" Divine madness in 1993 , thats some 33 years of Daaroodism and i can back up my claim , but can the Daarood refute? or rather whine about that facts? i'd say they will do the latter

The`Republic wrote:Lol Aristocrat you must be talking about where Siciid made my point about Bon Marehan being the posessed or slaves and servants which the same article he posted (because it contained the name "Bon Marehan") in the next sentence explained it was in fact the servants and slaves to the clan. That one is harmless--not an intellectual bone in his body. The majority of what he runs with are google snippet views. If you shout hard enough, you sully the well--that's his tactic. It's bankrupt for people like me and frankly the worst thing you can do to a man is not respect him even if you don't like him. I am apathetic about him.

As for Xplaya I actually like him even though everything he posts is to counter some supra-Darod mythical historical control. Xplaya shows signs of intellectualism and I admire and respect him in that scope. If you are going to be learned start with genuine intellectual curiosity and he certainly shows that.

Voltage you are far too generous. Admittedly XKeyse appears to be mildly more intelligent than siciid. However, comparatively speaking a chimpanzee is also a more intelligent and more evolved mammal than a hedgehog but that does not make its noise more intellectual or any less tolerable. The reason why he seems more intellectual than siciid is because compared to him, he has a better command of the English. Thus, his ad hominem and polemics pass off as 'signs of intellectualism'. However, in reality he is intellectually as vacant and barren as his tribal colleagues. He too suffers from the inferiority complex and the problems of mental deficiencies that run undercurrent in their society. They are forever engaged in eternal battle to combat and to destroy the darod conspiracy that dispossessed their history. And in order to give the pass off to this delusional fallacies as verified history, they engage in perverse revisionist history. Disputing historical facts in a scholarly and intellectual way is not a problem and it should be encourage. Nevertheless, the problem arise when someone with a perverted version of history tries to molest and violate it with impotent fallacies. Where fair minded people seek knowledge to further their own intellectual curiosity, people like Xkeyse seek to garner a filter evidence to give support to their delusions and predisposed position. All other evidence are discarded even if they are overwhelming compelling.He is willing to forge, to misinterpret and to lie. Their purpose is to willingly mis-educate, to misled and to misinform in order to celebrate to their conspiracy.
Voltage, my friend these type of people are not worth of public platform and their dribbles should not be encouraged or entertained.

Aristo, why are you avoiding a manly debate rather then this effeminate way of attacking a man in third person while talking to your cousin TR???? are you that of a coward that you need to fight in that manner, its like you are standing behind TR and cussing me from there, thats what it would have looked like in real life .

Aristocat wrote:

The`Republic wrote:Lol Aristocrat you must be talking about where Siciid made my point about Bon Marehan being the posessed or slaves and servants which the same article he posted (because it contained the name "Bon Marehan") in the next sentence explained it was in fact the servants and slaves to the clan. That one is harmless--not an intellectual bone in his body. The majority of what he runs with are google snippet views. If you shout hard enough, you sully the well--that's his tactic. It's bankrupt for people like me and frankly the worst thing you can do to a man is not respect him even if you don't like him. I am apathetic about him.

As for Xplaya I actually like him even though everything he posts is to counter some supra-Darod mythical historical control. Xplaya shows signs of intellectualism and I admire and respect him in that scope. If you are going to be learned start with genuine intellectual curiosity and he certainly shows that.

Voltage you are far too generous. Admittedly XKeyse appears to be mildly more intelligent than siciid. However, comparatively speaking a chimpanzee is also a more intelligent and more evolved mammal than a hedgehog but that does not make its noise more intellectual or any less tolerable. The reason why he seems more intellectual than siciid is because compared to him, he has a better command of the English. Thus, his ad hominem and polemics pass off as 'signs of intellectualism'. However, in reality he is intellectually as vacant and barren as his tribal colleagues. He too suffers from the inferiority complex and the problems of mental deficiencies that run undercurrent in their society. They are forever engaged in eternal battle to combat and to destroy the darod conspiracy that dispossessed their history. And in order to give the pass off to this delusional fallacies as verified history, they engage in perverse revisionist history. Disputing historical facts in a scholarly and intellectual way is not a problem and it should be encourage. Nevertheless, the problem arise when someone with a perverted version of history tries to molest and violate it with impotent fallacies. Where fair minded people seek knowledge to further their own intellectual curiosity, people like Xkeyse seek to garner a filter evidence to give support to their delusions and predisposed position. All other evidence are discarded even if they are overwhelming compelling.He is willing to forge, to misinterpret and to lie. Their purpose is to willingly mis-educate, to misled and to misinform in order to celebrate to their conspiracy.
Voltage, my friend these type of people are not worth of public platform and their dribbles should not be encouraged or entertained.

The issue here is you can not force others to believe the lies your parents brought you up with, everybody that doesn't agree with you is automatically wrong and their history is considered revisionist by you; and you have the nerve to say other people suffer from an inferiority complex.