hydrogen wrote:Actually the world didn't start in Africa, these filthy afrocentric lies are not my cup of tea. If the world started in Africa why don't Europeans have rough negroid hair?
The world in started in Arabia with Adam (pbuh) and Noah's remaining children of different races migrated across the world and some children were not as clever as the others e.g the ones whom become tribe monkey negroids.
Somalis have Eurasian DNA but 85% of our DNA is exclusive to us from our protected gene pool.
There is no evidence whatsoever that indicates that this so-called "Eurasian DNA" originated outside of Africa. In fact, the only evidence that exists suggesting the origin of the shared haplogroups between Somalis (and other Horn of Africans and Sahelian peoples) and non-Africans shows that its existence is as old as the Horn of African people, it originated in us. So, in reality, the fact that so many genetic studies show a large portion of shared maternal and paternal lineage between our people and non-Africans further supports the most widely accepted origin of mankind among the scientific community - that is, that today's peoples are derived from people of the Horn.
In the Horn, people vary greatly in hair textures. You can see indigenous people in the Horn with kinky, curly, wavy, and straight hair. Even within my family there is this variance. There is also a variance in facial features although we are known for our "aquiline" features, although this can vary too. So, since there is already a diversity of features among us that is present in all groups and yet a homogeneity that has led to us being able to tell whether another person is from the Horn or not shows that we are one people, unmixed, ancient, and that all groups of people's features came from ours. Otherwise, we would not have a discernable feature, the cave paintings and ancient descriptions of our people would not match with what we look like today (even in the first millennium AD, Somalis - known by another name - were known for being tall, "handsome", proud, and fiercely independent.
My statements are supported by an abundance of scientific evidence while yours is based on insinuations. So, since you do not have scientific proof backing you up, your statements are not based on fact and are thus invalid and are the "lies". If you'd like a list of scientific studies, I'll put it up in another post but you'll also have to provide evidence as well. Truth cannot be "centric" on any group, whereas statements based on biases that irrationally favour Eurocentric ancestry despite the truth is illogical and reveals a Eurocentric mentality. If such a mentality leads you to deny reality, then it is a poison and I truly hope you seek truth and evidence and use reason to overcome it.
only canaan was cursed and the prophecy fulfilled itself when they lost their land to the isrealites. thousands of years ago.
how am i fake