Voltage wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:57 pm
Hi Xildiid-
So you do not then deny in 1961, in a Somali language commission report that has Muuse Galaal as chairman, he and the commission specifically recommended "Shire Jama's Latin modified script."
Oh great. Aren't you the backward little reer baadiye who aaid on page one of that topic that Siad Barre recommended him out of tribalism?
Maybe Isaaqs like I have been told do not have xishood, but your commentary on this subject is devoid of any sf-respect or shame considering the WRITTEN historical record.
Where's paperino aka Arabman who was claiming that we resorted to Ad Hominems against this Boon, as if this Boon was innocent?
Boon
You're conflating two issues here..
1. Galaal might have recommended Shires script but it was a script that was completely different from the modern script we have today. Nonetheless, Galaal did not claim that Shire was the father of the Somali script.
2. Afweyne Barre and his Kacaan junta championed Shire as the father of the Somali script even though he did not contribute anything to the modern script. Their motivation was tribalism.
Do you see the difference?
Don't project your reality, bilaa xishood is the culture of your Dofaar Ismaciil coalition. The baseless lies and the historical revisionism is being dismantled one by one.