@Lamagoodle, if they claim to be atheists, they are atheists and we will call them as such. It is not that we're labeling them; it is just that we're calling them what they claim to be.
If they are purposely entering religious topics and insulting what we hold dear the most - Islam - we will call them out on the scum they are. However, if an atheist(s) want to engage rational debate, we should be responding to the questions they have and kindly welcome them to Islam, or politely respect their views. In Islam, you stay firm to the evildoers; and be kind to those who won't harm us, and won't attack our faith and our prophet (peace and blessings be upon him).
For some reason, you defend them whenever an Atheist guy do the unthinkable. Is there a reason we don't know that you're doing it? I remember you stating that I have many Wahabi propoganda, yet here you're always out of the wood-works whenever a topic involving atheists is brought up. Is there a reason that you can share with us why you only defend atheists?
Why are new rules invented here when issues that involves atheists is discussed here?
P.s. tribalists cannot claim to be holier than others.
It is the nature of Somalis to be tribalists and it is not something we're, including you, running away from. However, this tribalism can never take away what we hold dear: Our Islamic faith. At the same time it can't be a cover for those who are just coming here to insult Islam and for those who are defending them.
P.s.s cheerleading in bad faith is against the basics of islam
Supporting someone you're agree with is not cheerleading. However, what is more chearleading than defending the worst scum atheists who come here to insult our beloved Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings upon him).
P.S.
I also know some who bash Islamic scholars who are not here to defend themselves but defend the atheists. How can an atheist who is doing the unthinkable be defended, but Islamic scholars - who are not here to defend themselves - be ridiculed and their character assassinated?