Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
Hoowle wrote:you know, debating is two way street. I gave you a reply that had a partial list of "transitional forms" between humans and ape-like creatures we descended from. what is your response? do you reject the list I gave? if yes, why?
No Hoowle, you are the typical fraud. First of all let us put this into context because I have seen this argument before.
1. This illustration is from the august 1999 version of Time magazine and was illustrated by Douglas Theobald. MOST of them are fossils found that are filled in for the missing holes and the "blue" color signify the ones that could be least accurate.
2. Almost all of them are not even in our line of ancestry but "cousins". Since they cannot proof we are from them, they don't want to risk of looking like frauds by saying we are without any evidence so they use the "relative" word. (KEEP IN MIND THIS IS STILL IN OUR OWN LINE SEPARATE FROM APES/CHIMPS.
3. Most of important of all NONE are between Human line and Apes/Chimps. There is not ONE evidence that humans and apes were at any point joined.
Basra- wrote: Wallle there are a lot of none believers in the forum. Istaqfurulaah. Alcohol and western hemisphere has corrupted our warm blooded somali brethrem.
more like illuminated to knowledge beyond dogmatic myths from the stone age
I ask you a couple of questions.
why are religious folk scared of people learning more about the world and our place in it?
why do you want to hinder science?
why do you not want your children to explore beyond thousand year old myths?
Humans are apes ignoramus. We share 98% of our DNA with them
I know why we share that.. and quite honestly I believe in that deeply .. but you tell me how did that come about Mr real-talk..
Or you just made this new nick to support your other alias Hoowle.. and appear like you are winning an argument ..only in your mind of course..
But enlighten us..with concrete evidence that we actually came from a common ancestor..me/you/apes/Unicellular bacteria/fungi...and all animals basically..and living beings..including the trees..
you seem to know and believe in the theory more than the rest of us the ignorant masses.
You want concrete evidence well then DNA is your answer. The fact that every living creature on planet earth shares the same blueprint in its design points toward a common origin. Add onto the fact that the fossil record shows us the appearance of new species at certain periods of time and the disappearance of others at other points in time. This is the framework of evolution. Now remember evolution never states a creator can't exist. In fact it doesn't deal with creation at all but rather explaining how the diversity of life we see today came about. Its only insecure theists that see the theory of evolution as a threat to their faith. I personally don't understand how someone who has such deep belief in their faith could be bothered by the advancement of human knowledge. Maybe you can explain that to me?
But I digress. I really don't have the time to write out everything I want on this topic to illuminate you guys that don't understand evolution, so I'll just let someone else do it. Here is a nice video if you want to be taught of how much CONCRETE EVIDENCE there is for evolution. Lots of good information here provided by a Professor Ken Miller, who edited some of the biology text books you used in high school, for all you creationists who believe evolution isn't backed by solid scientific evidence.
Oh and BTW I'm not Hoowle. I've actually been just reading this board for a couple of weeks and this thread finally spurred me to register and post. I just found it hilarious how much ignorance there was on the topic by all the naysayers. Hoowle was handling the job fine educating you guys but I thought I'd join in just to show that there is more than 1 educated rational Somali on this board.
Last edited by Real_Talk on Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Oh Ok.. now the typical reader who saw the sparkling water.. and decided to come to the assistance of his overwhelmed friend Howle....
How nice of you.. why did you decide to do so..if he was handling very well on his own?? but you had to show that there are other educated ppl around right??
Typical and expected..is that you attack ppl when your idea is questioned.. and call ppl creationist, islamists, ignorant masses..and what have you.. sound familiar??
Very informative for all you creationists who believe evolution isn't backed by solid scientific evidence.
Now.. leave videos out of the discussion.. and write what you consider as solid scientific evidence.. will ya??
I can pretty much tolerate every one and every crazy idea that one might come up with.. what I cant tolerate however id fake ppl.
Oh.. The DNA crap your taliking about does not cut it for me..
cos I have my own explanation for it.. based on religioun and the word of the creator..so better luck in next life.
Cawar wrote:Oh Ok.. now the typical reader who saw the sparkling water.. and decided to come to the assistance of his overwhelmed friend Howle....
How nice of you.. why did you decide to do so..if he was handling very well on his own?? but you had to show that there are other educated ppl around right??
Typical and expected..is that you attack ppl when your idea is questioned.. and call ppl creationist, islamists, ignorant masses..and what have you.. sound familiar??
Very informative for all you creationists who believe evolution isn't backed by solid scientific evidence.
Now.. leave videos out of the discussion.. and write what you consider as solid scientific evidence.. will ya??
I can pretty much tolerate every one and every crazy idea that one might come up with.. what I cant tolerate however id fake ppl.
Oh.. The DNA crap your taliking about does not cut it for me..
cos I have my own explanation for it.. based on religioun and the word of the creator..so better luck in next life.
I don't have the time to write essays so ask me pointed questions and I'll give you pointed answers. Reading most of this thread I can tell from your questions that you don't have a proper understanding of evolution.
First take a high school biology course. Then maybe a college biological anthropology course. Then maybe I'll take you seriously.
Mr. Yungnfresh wrote:Hoowle, William Paley's "Watchmaker" analogy contends that if u discover a sophisticated watch in the middle of the desert, then it's logical to conclude an equally or more sophisticated watchmaker must have made it, even if that watchmaker isn't readily accessible. Your example of dropping the watch in the amazon doesn't make any sense....whether the natives there don't understand the fact that a watch is man-made has no bearing on the fact that it is, much like how your inability to grasp how a Supreme Being fashioned and skillfully crafted us and our environment has no bearing on the fact that He did.
Hoowle wrote:It is true that to us humans a watch MUST have a maker. but why? because we have experience with people making watches. we have evidence and good reasons for expecting watches to have makers. however, we have no experience with the Supreme Being "crafting" our environment. it takes a leap of faith to assume that a Supreme Being is behind our environment. you need to do better.
btw, the watchmaker argument is a variation of the "God of the Gaps." according to some Creationists the world is so complex and we know so little of how it works, God can fill this knowledge gap. basically committing argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy.
Since we know a complex watch must have an equally or more complex watchmaker, what about this world which is infinitely more complex than a watch? The same way u don't have to see the watchmaker to know he exists, since the watch he made is proof enough of his existence, a Supreme Being has to be behind the design of this universe....because the alternative to that would be a complex universe with noone behind it.
Mr. Yungnfresh wrote:As for your comment about science being self-correcting and religion remaining stagnant, something that is originally correct requires no further development.
Hoowle wrote:This is called circular logic. your conclusion (requires no further development) assumes your premise (originally correct). how do you know it was originally correct? because Allah told you so? you have to first demonstrate that it was originally true then you have reasons for believing it has no need for no further development. it is like me saying: Microsoft makes best operating systems because Microsoft said so. I can make good money as Microsoft advertiser if we follow your line of reasoning.
The Qur'an already contains accurate information pertaining to embryology, oceanography, geology, astronomy, physics, etc. The fact that this information was conveyed to us through a desert dweller who lived 1400 ago, before the advent of modern science, is enough for me to believe in the Qur'an since the information it contained is being proven correct today through modern science, one after the other.
Mr. Yungnfresh wrote:Now, if the correct conclusion is the one you started off with, what's the need to further elaborate and investigate?
Hoowle wrote:then you don't understand science. there are no certainties in science. if there were, they'd be no reason for scientists at all. what do you think all those scientists do everyday? they test other scientists works and theories. this is why science produces progress while religions produce nothing but divisions (there are some 10,000 religions in the world).
That's the thing, there are no certainties in science and what was considered correct yesterday is wrong today....and what's considered correct today will be proven wrong tomorrow. There is no "proof" for Islam being the truth...just an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence which, combined together, leaves no reasonable doubt to reasonable people that it's authentic and true.
Mr. Yungnfresh wrote:the one thing evolutionists have never been able to explain. How do you explain gravity?
Hoowle wrote:Supporters of evolution theory don't explain gravity. you need to ask physicists.
Gravity is the single greatest element that points to the existence of a Creator. There's no other scientific explanation for how it came into existence. Evolutionists have a skewed explanation for pretty much everything, but are mum on the issue of gravity. Although gravity is derived from physics, it refutes the theory of evolution which would like to substitute a Creator for evolving from apes all on our own, when the latter has no possible explanation or compatible theory for how gravity came about.
Mr. Yungnfresh wrote:Hoowle, William Paley's "Watchmaker" analogy contends that if u discover a sophisticated watch in the middle of the desert, then it's logical to conclude an equally or more sophisticated watchmaker must have made it, even if that watchmaker isn't readily accessible. Your example of dropping the watch in the amazon doesn't make any sense....whether the natives there don't understand the fact that a watch is man-made has no bearing on the fact that it is, much like how your inability to grasp how a Supreme Being fashioned and skillfully crafted us and our environment has no bearing on the fact that He did.
As for your comment about science being self-correcting and religion remaining stagnant, something that is originally correct requires no further development. Science is a process, and through trial and error, certain conclusions are made until more viable explanations are uncovered. Now, if the correct conclusion is the one you started off with, what's the need to further elaborate and investigate? Religion remaining consistent does not detract from it's authenticity, it reinforces it.
Now for the BIG one....the one thing evolutionists have never been able to explain. How do you explain gravity?
WTF??? Are you serious? I mean really? Or are you retarded?
What the hell does got damn gravity got to do with evolution?
I really think idiots who know nothing about science or evolution should refrain from debating about it. Taking an introductory high school biology course before posting again in this thread.
LoL @ this retard calling anybody else retarded....listen retard, u not being able to understand a question's relevance doesn't mean the question doesn't make sense...it just means u don't understand the significance of the question cuz ur a retard, u retard. And that's "Real Talk".
Mr. Yungnfresh wrote:in other words, u need some time to research
Homey don't need anymore research cause he's pretty much destroyed all of ya'll in this thread.
props to hoowle for actually being educated beyond high school in the topic of evolution........unlike everyone else in this thread
I must agree, that youngfresh guy/girl whatever is pretty stupid. The questions being asked by him/her and the way he/she digested the information clearly shows his/her lack of intellect.
Idiot Perhaps comparing Youngfresh to an ape issnt such a bad thing
Look at this faggot waiting for an opportunity to take a cheapshot....are u still mad i thought u were a female in a flowered dress the first 6 months u posted here? I wasn't tryna offend u or nothing....Wallahi i really did think ur a chick....it might have something to do with the fact that 99% of the shyt u post is more feminine than what even other females post. Anyway, my bad dhiloyahay....if it ain't too much trouble, trying being a man sometime
“Aaaah i see. Now i understand. You are under the dellusion that i am an atheist. “
I’m not under any delusion, I’m certain about your rotten atheism.
“You have truly believed that a mind as such mine, can only be in your atheist side of the fence”
Yes I truly believe that basra, and just because you have the ability to think rationally, does not mean that your mind is anything special. So stop pleasing your small head with self flattering please.
“I think you are so much offended that a mind such as mine, so developed, so conscience, so sharp and rationally intellectual could dare be a 'believer'?”
Oh, my god!!
“I am sure you have rationalized this phenomenon as to "WHY" i am not in your atheist camp.”
There is nothing to analyse here, we both know you are an atheist. Our only problem is that you liberate yourself and come out of the closet, as I have already stated.
“Galool aka Xplaya--my dear..... i think you are offended that someone as smart as I,….”
Ok, basra, you are the smartest person in this forum after me and everyone else. Now let this be the last time we here of how evolved you and your brain are please. Thanks.
“You absolutely are outraged that such a mind like mine.’( mention your mine one more time, and I will blow my head off with a colf.45)’can easily be lead in the path of light'. (This unbelievability of this phenomenon can be equated to your unbelievability to the existence of God).
Well, that is because, the idea of god is a small but charming concept, which even my grandmom’s pet goat, sareedo would object to if it had the ability to communicate. So, my unbelivability of god can be easily explained, whilst your ( fictional/pretentious) believability in him/her/it would warrant sudden and loud hollow laughter, if it weren’t so pathetically tragic.
“You are innately furious as to how i am not big ego'ed as you are, with my gift of intellect, how dare dont "I" ...."think" myself to Atheistville'. Is that your outrage? (by NO all means, am i denying the lack of any 'ego' but not that big as to doubt God. )”
Lier! I don’t have a big ego, infact you yourself testified to that when you said:
“You see dear-- just by interacting with you briefly, i can tell alot about you. I can tell that u r a liberatarian, a free spirited liberal groupie, -- who truly has good moral compus in your own right, but lacks that fundamental capacity to surrender to a higher creator, as Allaah.”
You nailed it there; and the reason I don’t need to surrender to a ‘higher creator’ as Allah, Yahweh, Jesus, Krishna, and the mareexaan oromo god of waaq, is because I have never encountered the idiots. Where do they hide I keep wondering. Tell me basra, in your 20/30 years of existence, has this Allaha ever give you a call? Did he in any way show care and seem to be concerned about your repressed sexual thoughts about women for example? May be in your dreams, but then we would have no way of extracting the nature of those dreams from your head. Unless, of course your mine is so developed as you claim, and may be had the ability to print visual images of what actually happened on some kind of paper to proof your isbaramuuto session with Allah swt. And even then, you would immediately be declared to be at worst some kind of an alien from a strange planet, at best to be an advanced Japanese human robot, and altogether, yet another proof that god does not exist.
“You are definitely an idealist who is refined in the art of self deceitfulness, with your grand sipping of starbucks latte, wishing to fix the world, free the world from pain and chaos.You are by the very definition of the word- "Liberatarian" I feel all this about you--its a vibe i get from you.”
Jesus christ basra, for a sec I felt like one of those dumb people, who put their trust in witches/psychics, and then get goose bumps after the old, wrinkly, overly made up witch gets one or two facts right about the unfortunate patient’s entire life span of facts. But again, I must give you credit for rightly locating my temperament type, and stating that I’m indeed an idealist and a dreamer. I’m not sure if I have refined any kind of art, let alone one of deceitfulness; but you are certainly right about me being a liberetarian. I tried to be selfish too on many occasions basra, god knows I have tried, but just couldln’t succeed. How do I overcome this weakness, besides a serious beating basra?
“But i must confess-- your only downfall--is your brain. You have unleashed an opening of doubt, questioning and consequently---blasphamous heresy.”
In other wors I have liberated myself from the stories of a desert holly man through doubt, questioning, open mind, and consequently, came to the conclusion.. thas as a Somali man of reer shkh Isxaaq decent.. I’m more superior and uselful to any god ever worshiped. You can test me by making me your god for a month and see how useful I’m to you in comparison to this illusive fellow you have been searching for 20 odd years.
“Thus---the element of soul-less creeps in.”
Basra please! You of all people, is actually accusing me of not having a soul?? Well, that is laughable, as you are mechanical in how you approach everything- from your idle jokes, at times intelligent but mostly childish fake psychological analysis, to your ridiculously pathetic attempts in participating in debates like an adult. You have no trace of humanity in you at all; sometimes I wonder if you are indeed and advanced human robot from Japan.
“looooool i challenge you to bring forth your arguements that i am an atheist. I know--u very well--Galool. u r not someone who likes to go by speculations and here say. You as a self avowed practical atheist---who strictly goes by active 'facto' rather than theory or speculative opinions.I challenge you to bring forth convinsing arguements bulleting your claims. (up for this challenging duet?lol)”
Sorry to say this basra, but this is gay, even coming from someone with lesbian tendencies like you. Not to mention unfair, because my only proof of your atheism is my sharp perception, endless intelligence, and being an atheist for 25 years –this atheistic ‘vibe’, -if I may borrow one of your psychic words, that I’m getting from you. You know you are atheist, I do too, and anyone ‘enlightened’ enough to read between the lines in your grossly sarcastic and patronising posts about religion will agree with me. Anything beyond that is irrelevant.
“Ok i by NO means do "I" deny that i have told again and again to people of somalinet "directly or 'indirectly' that i am 'sophisicated for them. Maybe i can understand --even boasting sophisication on the grounds of 'Socially" superior. (for i consider myself a none reer miyi.) But Galoool aka Xplaya--what i "dont" get --is why or how would i say i am 'too sophisicated' on the grounds of homosexuality?I mean, this slip of your tongue automatically makes "me" assume you think homosexuality as an upper, positive gradation to sophisication. By this guilty slip association, are you then broadcasting your camflauged homosexuality?I mean-- by no means will "I" be shocked if you came back and agreed to my accusations, that you are indeed a reer xamaar fag.”
This is what I wanted, allah, ilaahoww caqli hanoo waayin. Adeer macaanto basra quruxeey, I only hinted you might be a homosexual, because you hide it just like your atheism, not that I concern myself with people’s sexuality. I’m a libertarian as you know, and don’t really care who you sleep with, but stop suppressing this unique thoughts of yours, they can be bad for your health. My proof of this is that u initiate topics about homosexuality, and even provide links to ‘studies’ you say support how some genes, from one of the parents can render some potentially manly gaaljire, like luggoyo, a reer xamar fag midigta ka laafyooda. And ample of idiots here will testify that.
“You have already confessed you have "Syphilis", a capitol homosexual sexual disease. You are also an alcoholic-- no doubt from the unhappiness that atheism affords. And no doubt, me recognizing the very basis of your unfounded desire to maintain the torch of atheism, the root of your decadent misery- you find yourself confessing...that...”
First let me inform you that my 4th wife who is a doctor coupled with the grace of god have successfully cured me from syphilis. Secondly, I still like my beer, and don’t make any apologies for loving casiir. Thirdly you are the one who is sad and with a ‘decadent misery’ as you are both a closeted atheist and a lesbian-deadly combination- and I urge you to at least find your self in a group of people that will accept you for who you are, and comfort you. And finally never tell anyone, especially family members that you are either one of those vile things, for they will rouse you in the middle of the night, deport you back to burco, and marry you off to geeljire/terrost habaryoonis cousin who will beat you senseless, if you forget to wear your niqaab. And never dare say “ but I’m superior to you reer miyi people” in burco, they will literally woop you cute butt.
“BY all account i would LOVE to engage in a rebuttal exchange of intellectual post with you. I challenge you to bring forth proof of my atheism based on my postings here on somalinet, of course. (What am i saying?-- what else will u based your case from ? Its not like we both know each other in real life? Its not we are both in secret under the moon scientology religion slash cult in real life.)”
You would love to meet me in real life wouldn’t you?? So you can sit across me with your legs crossed, and play the doctor, and ask me penetrating questions like:
So tell me galool what is REALLY possessing you to be godless? I can tell you what the answer would be in advance: Fock off and find hobby you silly little girl. With that I would kick your fake flowers by the door on my way out.
“The question is--- are you up for an enticing, intellectual challenge with an intellectual equal or less equal given that i thoroughly declare i am your intellect superior?”
If the challenge is merely for entertainment reasons I just might give you the satisfaction. But if it is for intellectual reasons, I’m not into it for the simple reason that you lack, bravery, transparency, and honesty, and will eventually be a waste of time.
“True-- somalinet is very deprived of intellect, and true, ureysoo is a very BIG proof of it, both figuratively and metarphorically. However, maybe thats the deal.Maybe i annoy you because i am not ureeyso.Or any other somalinet 'low I.Q" victims of yours. “
How many times do I have to correct you basra? You are right; you are certainly not urayso and don’t shower only when it rains, but that is not the point. The point is you are not urasyo because you have seen the light, but pretend to be like urayso, and refuse to put your expensive perfumes for fear of cyber persecution. Which I think is just silly on your part, because if that happened you put each and one of them their god given position which is to stay dumb and deaf.