Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Somalis are hypocrites. All these people calling Siyaad Barre a tribalist are tribalist themselves. Siyaad Barre is above them and was more superior than them. Matter of fact Siyaad Barre had more Somalinimo than most Somalis today.kambuli wrote:So you don't care about Isaaq??? You don't do Isaaqisim? Is that what you are saying? Bal noo warran?
Tell us about your so called gov't? Is it qabyaalad free?
Just don't beat around the bush and don't resort into insults..I am not insulting you or anyone else..But answer my question and please marba qar ha isku qaadin:
Daarood and Faqash were crushed in 1991 Right?
Why do you refuse to join your brothers in the South? a very simple question...Siyaad gone, Faqash gone...
Why you refuse to join your brothers with
You did join Somalia, but after 1 year later in 1961 you guys tried to rebel again and failed. Forever rant about Siyaad Barre or Daarood.skywalker25 wrote:Kambuli
I believe in justice and fairness and we did join one Somalia and it was hijacked by your tol and used against us, why would we be foolish enough to repeat it?
Come on. This is not about Hawiye hating. Hawiye is a small factor if it all on why we dont want one Somalia.
You should preach to your tol who are either working for Ethiopians or Kenyans not Isaaq who have their house in order bothering nobody...
People didn't start rebelling pit of the blue you know, it was because of the way they were treated. Any one with a bit of self respect will defend themselves if they are targeted for no reason. During the 80's students were killed for no reason by the government in the northwestern region of the former Somali Republic. They were killed because they were protesting. Innocent civilians would be rounded up and shot on a daily basis. Refugees from Ethiopia would be given jobs and high wages whilst locals were denied opportunities like this. School children would be bled to death for blood to treat soldiers. What would you expect? Ofcourse people would rebel and defend themselves.XimanJaale wrote:Siyaad Barre was in power for 21 years and all you can talk about is the 1988 war? So you ignore all of his 21 years of rule over his battle with rebel groups. Not are you only ignoring his 21 years of rule but you are also justifying the concept of rebellion? I doubt the country you live in today will accept any rebels attacking the country they rule let it be a democratic country or a dictatorship country. Somalis and their jaahilnimo
People didn't start rebelling pit of the blue you know, it was because of the way they were treated. Any one with a bit of self respect will defend themselves if they are targeted for no reason. During the 80's students were killed for no reason by the government in the northwestern region of the former Somali Republic. They were killed because they were protesting. Innocent civilians would be rounded up and shot on a daily basis. Refugees from Ethiopia would be given jobs and high wages whilst locals were denied opportunities like this. School children would be bled to death for blood to treat soldiers. What would you expect? Ofcourse people would rebel and defend themselves.XimanJaale wrote:Siyaad Barre was in power for 21 years and all you can talk about is the 1988 war? So you ignore all of his 21 years of rule over his battle with rebel groups. Not are you only ignoring his 21 years of rule but you are also justifying the concept of rebellion? I doubt the country you live in today will accept any rebels attacking the country they rule let it be a democratic country or a dictatorship country. Somalis and their jaahilnimo
Don't lie, people didn't rebel but a group of opportunistic politicians and businessmen did whilst using the civilians as human-shields.chilinbadboy wrote: People didn't start rebelling pit of the blue you know, it was because of the way they were treated. Any one with a bit of self respect will defend themselves if they are targeted for no reason. During the 80's students were killed for no reason by the government in the northwestern region of the former Somali Republic. They were killed because they were protesting. Innocent civilians would be rounded up and shot on a daily basis. Refugees from Ethiopia would be given jobs and high wages whilst locals were denied opportunities like this. School children would be bled to death for blood to treat soldiers. What would you expect? Ofcourse people would rebel and defend themselves.
I'm not going to argue with you because your a sick tribalist since you're using terms such as 'Eydoor' in a debate that has nothing to do with qabyaalad. I'm not going to bother to reply to you when you start insulting me after this post because your not worth my time.XimanJaale wrote:Don't lie, people didn't rebel but a group of opportunistic politicians and businessmen did whilst using the civilians as human-shields.chilinbadboy wrote: People didn't start rebelling pit of the blue you know, it was because of the way they were treated. Any one with a bit of self respect will defend themselves if they are targeted for no reason. During the 80's students were killed for no reason by the government in the northwestern region of the former Somali Republic. They were killed because they were protesting. Innocent civilians would be rounded up and shot on a daily basis. Refugees from Ethiopia would be given jobs and high wages whilst locals were denied opportunities like this. School children would be bled to death for blood to treat soldiers. What would you expect? Ofcourse people would rebel and defend themselves.
All you mentioned is students protesting being killed and innocent civilians that were rounded up on daily basis which is false, how can people be killed on daily basis use your brains?! Also you mention refugees from Ethiopia being given jobs and ignoring locals which also sounds like propaganda.
You eydoors have no clue how much Siyaad Barre looked after your people, he was the one that saved you guys from the 70's famine and deployed troops to save your starving people. If he really hated you guys he would had let your people die. Don't come with me with propaganda.
The kacaan did much worse, the SNM condemned the actions of a few who took it upon themselves to get revenge. Why don't you acknowledge the kacaan who used bombers and foreign mercenaries to kill innocent civilians?STARKAST wrote:Liquid, do you really want me to ptove what is already known as public knowledge ? Should i also prove usc genocide in the capital ? this new cat already admitted what i've said anyways, he's probably younger than you too, shame.
chilinbadboy, rouge units ? stop the lies.