Well thank Allah for at least seeing what I was try to say.zumaale wrote:Jalaljalaaludin5 wrote:zumaale.
I think the glaring contradiction in your post above reinforce my initial thought and reading to your approach, attitude and unhealthy obsession to DNA testing and dissecting qabiilada soomaalida.
First you say that your first identity is that of your clan and and only those with blood ties should count. Then you go on to state that if your DNA says different, you will denounce your clan name. Raw emotion! And its only, if and when your DNA proves otherwise that your first Identity will be Muslim.
From all the members that took the test, you are the only who considered what should be done if your DNA proved different. Seriously?
Not disrespect intended and am only going by what you say.
Anyway, I will never interfere in your DNA discussion in the future
wa bilahi tawfiq.
-
-
-
With all due respect, you didn't read my post analytically. At the start of it I clearly stated that 'worldly' ties that matter so as to differentiate it from the bigger picture (Muslim Identity). Do you think I am an imbecile to put Qabil before Deen?
Furthermore, my post was also a clarification of my stance on what constitutes a genuine Qabil identity.
I happily agree with you that I am guilty of seeking tangible proof of my supposed lineage and not subscribing to an untested belief. That is not taking things too far but being methodical.
Just make sure that tangible proof doesn't make you disown tolka.
I mean honestly, what can we do if DNA says something different? If there is beef between sacad muse and samaron, that won't save me.
"Hang on guys, I do not belong to that clan. I just found out that I have been lie to all my life. Fuck them! That's right, I said it and I'll say it again....Fuck sacad muuse!!!" BANG!

Anyway, at least we understand each other now.

-
-
-