THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF POPULARITY!!!!

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
Daanyeer
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 15780
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 7:00 pm
Location: Beer moos ku yaallo .biyuhuna u muuqdaan

THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF POPULARITY!!!!

Post by Daanyeer »

Source: http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2 ... opularity/

March 4, 2009, 10:44 am
By Steven D. Levitt

It probably seems obvious to most people that being likeable and having good friends could be valuable in life. Since most economists are neither likeable nor have good friends, it is an idea that hasn’t been studied by economists until now.

My friend Gabriella Conti and a host of co-authors try to quantitatively measure the association between high-school popularity and wage earnings 35 years later in a new research paper.

“What a 1957 friend could do for you might be very different than what a 2009 friend can do for you.”
They use data from roughly 4,000 male respondents in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. In a 1975 survey, they were asked to name up to three of their closest friends when they were in high school back in 1957. Conti et al. then use the number of other people who named a specific person as a friend as their measure of that person’s popularity, and they compare that to a person’s current earnings.

They find that each extra close friend in high school is associated with earnings that are 2 percent higher later in life after controlling for other factors. While not a huge effect, it does suggest that either that a) the same factors that make you popular in high school help you in a job setting, or b) that high-school friends can do you favors later in life that will earn you higher wages.

Before you get on the phone to call your old high-school pals to complain that they’ve never done one darn thing to earn you more money, a few caveats are in order about the study.

First, out of necessity (because the authors want to look at earnings later in life) the data on friends is very old. What a 1957 friend could do for you might be very different than what a 2009 friend can do for you. Second, if I understand it correctly, people are asked to name their high-school friends 18 years after high school. I could easily imagine that there is a bias toward naming people who have been successful since high school as friends. For instance, I would imagine that if you went back and surveyed the people who went to high school with Barack Obama, his name would appear on the list of close friends a lot more today than it would have 20 years ago. Third — and this is quite interesting in its own right — popularity is highly correlated with other traits that prove to be very valuable in the labor force. For instance, people with high I.Q.’s and who planned to go to college are much more popular in their data. People with high I.Q.’s and lots of years of education also earn higher wages. While the 2 percent wage premium associated with popularity attempts to control for these other factors, to the extent that the authors aren’t able to control for everything, it is likely that their estimates will overstate the importance of popularity.

This is a very interesting study, especially when put side-by-side with Roland Fryer’s work on the “acting white” phenomenon among African-American teens. Roland finds that — unlike whites — among African-Americans, the students who are most successful academically in high school are punished by their peers when it comes to popularity. That finding has inspired Roland to institute a number of programs in the New York schools to try to make it “cool” to do well in school. In light of this new paper by Gabriella Conti and co-authors, I am even more eager to find out if Roland’s programs are working.

(A brief write-up of the Conti et al. research recently appeared in the London Times.)
User avatar
black velvet
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4976
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF POPULARITY!!!!

Post by black velvet »

Interesting
among African-Americans, the students who are most successful academically in high school are punished by their peers when it comes to popularity
Be stupid, be cool 8-)
Niya
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2955
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: At the end of the tunnel, waiting for the light to come on.

Re: THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF POPULARITY!!!!

Post by Niya »

How refreshing! An article that isn't from the misogynistic 'Men's Daily'

It is makes sense the more people one knows, the larger the network of contact one can cultivate for different reasons.



Freaknomics blog...............another one of my favorites :up:
Locked
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”