Relevance of Federal System in Somalia

[Desert-Runner]

If we look back to the human misery suffered by our people inside their country and abroad since early 90’s and up to now, and worst of all to the collapsing of our state, dismantling of its infrastructure, cessation of our socio-economic development etc, we painfully ask ourselves why all those plights occurred in such an indiscriminate and irresponsible manner? In other words, what were the root causes of all those quandary and wretchedness?

With all those troubles and pains encountered in the last two decades, we should posses the courage and the patience to analyze the origins of those problems, draw lessons from it, and avoid coming across it again in the future for betterment of our people and our country. By the way, it is not wise for most of our learned class to spend all the time long in describing of how those shocking events took place, pondering on minor issues in it while ignoring to address factors behind the existing dilemma on the purpose of extracting proper solution for it.

For many of us, the system of government practiced in post-independence era (unitary system) was one of the major factors that contributed most in fueling tensions and building mistrust among different segments of our society before finally igniting into full-scale civil war. It is by this system, according to this group, which facilitated the unfair distribution of wealth and unjust allocation of government sponsored developmental projects across regions and hence led to endless crisis we live until today.

So going back again to exercise the same unitary system in the new government of Somalia is certainly, according to them, a political suicide and a nation disaster that need to be avoided at any cost. Nonetheless, before concluding, let us first define the difference between the two mostly employed systems for administering of nations to realize the influence of our past system in feeding public outrage and disobedience and thus finally leading to the crash of our state before plunging our nation into a long and meaningless civil war.

1. Unitary system:

a) In unitary system, the constitution concentrates political powers and authority in the national government. Legislative power vested in the Parliament, executive power in the President, and judicial power in the Supreme Court and lower courts.

b) The President, as the head of government, is the chief executive and Commander in chief of the armed forces. S/he has general supervision over local governments (the provinces, cities, municipalities) which are weak and dependent on the national government.

c) All major laws and policies are passed by Parliament and approved by the President who is responsible for implementing them through his/her control of the executive departments and agencies and the bureaucracy, and general supervision over the local governments.

2. Federal System:

a) Federalism is a system of government whose primary feature, defined in its constitution, is the distribution of powers between a central or national authority (the federal government) and regional governments or states with their local governments.

b) Federalism emphasizes respect for the socio-cultural diversity of the people and seeks national unity in regional diversity. It promotes national solidarity and cooperation in governance, nation building, modernization, and development.

c) Federalism emphasizes regional and local self-rule and self-reliance in governance. This means that decisions should be made at the lowest possible level where the problems can be solved.

d) While regional or state governments are designed to be autonomous in their regional and local affairs in relation to the federal government, the federal government provides assistance to the various regions and states, especially the less developed ones, as in all federal systems in the world.

Weaknesses of Unitary System in our Past

Those of us who are familiar with our troubled past know too well that regional alienation, corruption, squander, indifference to suffering in other regions, lack of equal development etc. have been facilitated by political control from the centre. Therefore, those in power, with no exception had little incentive to conserve our resources and institutions. Past leaders made consumption of resources and abolition of institutions their priorities. Indeed many treated the country's resources like a common pool, over which they possessed ill-defined ownership, or should I say no political ownership. In fact, to our leaders with no exception whatsoever, killing the goose that laid the golden egg was always their goal.

Relevance of Federal System

The restructuring of our institutions in ways that will reduce the ability of our leaders and their governments to use power in unpredictable and arrogant ways is a duty that every citizen should advocate for to avoid our painful past of governance.

Under federalism, we are for participatory democracy. We believe that participation makes development demand-driven, bottom-up rather than top-down and supply-driven. We feel assured that federal government will greatly minimize waste of the country's scarce resources, since it will make people's voices heard, and their rights to participate in shaping their affairs respected.

Furthermore, had we adopted a federal system after the union of South and North in July 1st 1960, we would have never witnessed a rift between Mogadishu and Hargeisa and then to subsequent calls for unconditional divorce between the two zones. Besides, the unification of the two parts itself is not an option to blame, as many Somalilanders may believe, but rather to the unitary system enforced to run the new republic accordingly.

Puntland’s experience as a State

The final draft of the first constitution of Puntland written during the formation of PSS in 1998 declares explicitly that Puntland is part of Somalia but shall exercise a full autonomous authority until a federal constitution endorsed in a national referendum comes into place.

Since then Puntland was practicing itself as an autonomous state whereby most of governmental institutions are running in a normal manner and the region is enjoying a relative peace and stability.

The political process is undergoing a significant progress and since 1998, four administrations have rotated seats, one after the other, through voting of MPs despite the slow pace of improving the electoral system. In fact, the previous administrations have not done enough in shifting the system of representation inside the Parliament and in other institutions at regional and district levels as well from a clan-based deal to a fairer one man-one vote structure. For instance, regional governers are still getting their nominations through the issuance of presidential decrees rather than achieving it through direct voting from the constituents of districts they represent. Hopes are high for correcting of all those pitfalls in the current administration.

Despite such hindrances in Puntland political reform, people here prefer more to the current governing system than the previous unitary one because they already recognized the differences between the two and that the latter made their voices heard and respected than before. As a result, with all the basic services acquirable inside, locals no longer travel to a distant city in Somalia to merely attend a college, receive routine check-ups in a hospital there or worst of all for the purpose to obtain an individual passport as was the case in the past when all those services stashed in that location alone!

Currently there are over four universities in Puntland, as many as ten different colleges with different concentrations, over fifteen major hospitals, more than thirty-eight secondary schools etc. Private businesses are as well a booming sector that strived high and have trade connections through out the Arabian Gulf states and around the world.

Comparing above to what existed in Puntland before the end of Barre’s regime is strikingly alarming and unrivaled. That difference alone, which can result in any other region as well, could provide a persuading case for federal system to reign in the Third Republic of Somalia.

by Said Farah

[AR1223]

A federal system is a secular system invented by non-Muslims. It isn't compatible with the teachings of Islam. What's more, there isn't a model African or Muslim country where a federal system has worked even partially.

[AbdiWahab252]

Desert Runner,

Assume we have federalism. So how do you propose the nation be divided ? Is it by tribal states ? Is it by combining districts from the old 9 regions ?

[FAH1223]

A federal system is a secular system invented by non-Muslims. It isn't compatible with the teachings of Islam. What's more, there isn't a model African or Muslim country where a federal system has worked even partially.

how is sharing resources with the people and equally distributing tax payer money to public projects/institutions against Islam?

[gemini07]

[AR1223]

how is sharing resources with the people and equally distributing tax payer money to public projects/institutions against Islam?

Because while sharing resources and equally distributing tax payer money are two fine concepts, it isn't practical to carry it out through a federal system. A federal system is a secular one that will be based on capitalism with individuals, companies and corporations owning those resources. Do the oil revenues in Texas and Alaska reach the average American? Do the revenues of other resources (gold, diamond, precious metals, tollway, etc) reach the average American? Do enough/fair taxpayer money reach its payers or the poor, or a large chunk of it spent on pork barrels, large inefficient and wasteful projects (such as the Big Dig) that cost quadruple the projected costs, military industry including adventures in Muslim countries, supporting repressive and corrupt regimes, etc? The other thing, with the tribal mindset of Somali elders, it would be near-impossible for (example) an oil-rich federal region to equally (or even 15%) share its resources with other poor federal regions. This is our land, our region, why should we share our God-given wealth with other regions, especially with other rival clans? Corruption, nepotism and favoritism will make sure a large chunk of the resources will end up in the pockets of a few, thus making sure the cycle of stratification, discrimination, poverty, lack of medical coverage will continue. Just like in America, where millions are homeless, hungry and without medical coverage. Federalism as with other shiny concepts such as democracy are fine on paper, but impractical where it matters.

[Desert-Runner]

A federal system is a secular system invented by non-Muslims. It isn't compatible with the teachings of Islam. What's more, there isn't a model African or Muslim country where a federal system has worked even partially.

Lets not jump on each others throat with this secular nonsense sxb, a federal system only insures us one fundamental point and that is abandoning the notion of creating Somalia from top down approach and replacing it from bottom up approach. Puntland could serve as a model state since it has a society that has entirely decentralized its power. Peace and order have been kept by traditional arrangements. There were no hierarchically based police, no army, no schools, no hospitals. All functions usually carried on by the State were de facto privatized. And Islam played an important role from the perspective of organizing the society for your info sxb.

[AbdiWahab252]

Desert Runner,

Assume we have federalism. So how do you propose the nation be divided ? Is it by tribal states ? Is it by combining districts from the old 9 regions ?

Desert Runner,

Please address my questions ?

[Desert-Runner]

Desert Runner,

Assume we have federalism. So how do you propose the nation be divided ? Is it by tribal states ? Is it by combining districts from the old 9 regions ?

I think the way Puntland has gone is best, the way it has come about I think has a meaningful purpose...it came about from frustration fuel by the continuous failures of dozens of general Somali peace conferences, (in Djibouti, Ethiopia, Yemen, Kenya, Egypt, Somalia among other). They were forced in a way to take a different path after the total rejection of the agreement among faction leaders signed in Cairo (basically an accord between the Ali Mhadi and Aidid clans).

Puntland come to this decision on its own, so me telling you how the nation should be divided has no relevance really, a state could only be born out of real frustration and that in turn brings about people with common interest together...I have yet to see that in the south.

[AbdiWahab252]

Desert,

The reason I ask is that how are state boundaries determined. Who resolves disputes ?

[FAH1223]

how is sharing resources with the people and equally distributing tax payer money to public projects/institutions against Islam?

Because while sharing resources and equally distributing tax payer money are two fine concepts, it isn't practical to carry it out through a federal system. A federal system is a secular one that will be based on capitalism with individuals, companies and corporations owning those resources. Do the oil revenues in Texas and Alaska reach the average American? Do the revenues of other resources (gold, diamond, precious metals, tollway, etc) reach the average American? Do enough/fair taxpayer money reach its payers or the poor, or a large chunk of it spent on pork barrels, large inefficient and wasteful projects (such as the Big Dig) that cost quadruple the projected costs, military industry including adventures in Muslim countries, supporting repressive and corrupt regimes, etc? The other thing, with the tribal mindset of Somali elders, it would be near-impossible for (example) an oil-rich federal region to equally (or even 15%) share its resources with other poor federal regions. This is our land, our region, why should we share our God-given wealth with other regions, especially with other rival clans? Corruption, nepotism and favoritism will make sure a large chunk of the resources will end up in the pockets of a few, thus making sure the cycle of stratification, discrimination, poverty, lack of medical coverage will continue. Just like in America, where millions are homeless, hungry and without medical coverage. Federalism as with other shiny concepts such as democracy are fine on paper, but impractical where it matters.

i agree with that part, but disagree with the rest

it can work and you dont have to lose to corporations

[Desert-Runner]

Signal,

Your 100% right sxb, when puntland's founders met in Garowe a decision was taken to start a thorough constitutional process based on three fundamental points. A) to abandon the notion of creating Somalia from top down approach and replace it from bottom up approach. B) to propagate for other Somali groups and territorial entities to create similar administrative systems. C) after the establishment of regional administrations, to begin negotiations for the reunification of Somalia on federal bases.

Lets hope the rest can follow.

[AbdiWahab252]

Signal,

If it is tribal, where does it stop ? Harti for Harti, HG for HG, Mudulood for Mudulood ?

[AbdiWahab252]

Signal,

I do support Federalism under the right conditions.

But say there is a spat between two tribes. For argument sake, Sacad & OMar Maxmud have skirmishes. Who resolves the dispute ? Galmudug or Puntland. What if they can not resolve it ? What prevents the two sides from clashing ?

[AR1223]

i agree with that part, but disagree with the rest

it can work and you dont have to lose to corporations

You claim it can work, but this is the question; is there a model African/Muslim country where it worked?