PUBLISHED: GAY MARRIAGE IN CALIFORNIA HARMS FAMILIES !!!

[Daanyeer]

Source: mensdaily
By David Usher | Jun 21, 2009


My treatise “Gay Marriage in California Harms Families” has just been published in a book on gay and lesbian family issues titled “Gay and Lesbian Families”, by Gale publishing.



This book is available now at Barnes and Noble, and will be available elsewhere soon.

My piece constitutes chapter 9 of the book. This marks the first publication of my leading premise about the fundamental and exquisitely harmful inequality of same sex marriage:

Heterosexual marriage is the only institution that fully and naturally erases all physical, economic, social, elective, legally-imposed, and culturally-imposed differences that exist between women and men”.

The chapter includes a detailed analysis about what this premise means in human, general principles of law, and civil rights terms.

I encourage all serious pro-family advocates, college students, and law students to get a copy of this book and research how this thesis can be applied to relevant civil rights case law to argue against the alleged constitutionality of same-sex marriage. [Disclosure: I do not receive royalties from this book].

Anything that would immediately create organized statutory discrimination based on sex (particularly with regard to natural reproductive ability and the social, political, parental , and economic rights that exist only when one is a fully-vested participant in heterosexual marriage), cannot be held to be subsequently argued to be a valid constitutional right in itself.

I regret that I cannot publish the article here because it is copyrighted material. I do have some similar articles on the internet similarly discussing these issues.

However, I can mention one new major point about same-sex marriage I recently realized that is not included in the article: Feminism is actually a Eugenics movement, and same-sex marriage is the goal modern eugenicists intent to achieve to fully end the participation of men in marriage, family, society, and economy.

Margaret Sanger and various feminists and racists of the early eugenics movement attempted to eradicate blacks and others by interfering with their ability to reproduce. This backfired and fell into disfavor because, unlike the Ku Klux Klan’s method of discrimination primarily targeting men, eugenics primarily targeted women.

It was not until years later that the Ku Klux Klan fell out of favor — because racism targeting black men invariably comes full circle to harm black women (My grandmother Florence Richardson Usher, a Missouri suffragette leader, realized this and was one of the few suffragettes who strongly advocated for bringing black women into the suffragette movement as early as 1911).

Historians must note that the Ku Klux Klan was the home base for feminism until the mid-1930’s, and was run by a woman. Women no longer needed the KKK and abandoned it to study the teachings of Freud and the Frankfurt School intellectuals who immigrated to New York at the end of World War 1. These principles, combined with sexual liberation principles learned from Kinsey and Masters and Johnson, powered the explosive entrance of the modern sex-eugenicist movement on the American scene in the early 1960’s. The modern eugenicist movement was successful primarily because of the overwhelming magnetism of the primordial soup of organized sexual, social, psychoactive, pseudo-scientific, and political messages it delivered concurrently.

Modern feminism is now a fully-blown, mature eugenics movement that has devoted its major resources since the mid-1980’s towards creating a form of eugenicist marriage handing women chattel control of marriage, children, society, politics, and income. It has fooled several states into approving same-sex marriage and civil unions.

Same-sex marriage is designed to replace men (using seduction or outright fraud to get men’s sperm) and force them into monetary slavery via the widespread custom of “child support”.

Since modern eugenics only targets men — and discriminating against men is still widely considered politically-correct — modern eugenics has been successful but has been falling out of favor with women at large.

Gay mens’ vigorous participation in eugenics is horrendously paradoxical. We know that gay men have six to eight times more sex partners than heterosexual men, and AIDs is the leading cause of their deaths or permanent disability. Yet, gay men blame everyone else for the problems they have — claiming that “homophobia” somehow causes the very gay behavioral problems they also often claim are “genetic”. The litany of Freudian or Socratic rationalizations justifying blind pursuit of death is endless — and not unlike the “Officer Krupke” scene from West Side Story in which gang members justify themselves by saying “I’m depraved on account of I’m deprived”.

It is not unreasonable to suggest that gay men are part of a self-inflicted death cult — the penultimate form of emasculation and self-destruction of rights — turning inwards the feminist hate for men inculcated in all men by feminists, mothers, and academia over the past 45 years. I do sincerely hope that gay men see what feminists are doing to them, and walk away from this cult before it kills them.

Modern eugenics will fall out of favor once everyone understands it for what it is. Like racism, modern sexual eugenics always comes full-circle to greatly harm women and children who live in poverty and unsafe cities. Men will not disappear from earth as eugenicists hope will happen — rather — most women will never subscribe to sex eugenics and will flatly reject this movement the moment they realize what it really is.

Let us devote ourselves towards ending the modern sex-eugenics movement. The principles and facts are on our side. All we have to do is teach everyone about it.

© 2009, David R. Usher