Page 1 of 1
indirect incitement....
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:16 pm
by biko
some of the new legislation and anti-terror laws that are pushed through the parliment at the wake of the landon bombing. so i was just wondering if this means i can no longer say things like..." death to all americans?
do i have to change tactics? and whats the best way to speak the truth about americans without falling victim to this laws?
or if a YANKEE loose his neck to al qaeda, can i say.." now that aint right but i totaly understand!
any suggestions will be appreciated.
hare krishna
Re: indirect incitement....
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:49 am
by Aiman
Bismillah,
.
.
I guess you can't wish death to all americans but it is acceptable for the zionist american kuffar (the leaders and its military)and those who support them.
"..... if a YANKEE loose his neck to al qaeda, can i say.." now that aint right but i totaly understand!"
Now that is a good tactical change
.
I think that the so called "freedom of expresion" does not apply to the Muslims (whether you are citizen or not) you will most definately accused of being "terrorist sympathizer."
Re: indirect incitement....
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:00 am
by biko
[quote="Aiman"]Bismillah,
.
.
I guess you can't wish death to all americans but it is acceptable for the zionist american kuffar (the leaders and its military)and those who support them.
"..... if a YANKEE loose his neck to al qaeda, can i say.." now that aint right but i totaly understand!"
Now that is a good tactical change
.
I think that the so called "freedom of expresion" does not apply to the Muslims (whether you are citizen or not) you will most definately accused of being "terrorist sympathizer."[/quote]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
i know what you mean about the freedom of expresion bro and how it aplies differently to muslims. that is exactly why i have to be careful, cos i dont want to end up in a cell with abu hamza.