Yalaxow is nothing but a sheytaan who is trying to give suspicions to people regarding their religion.
Quran is perfect and after Prophet SCWS no one can add or take anything from it and whoever says something different disbelieves in Quran and Islam because Allah says He will protect it.
It is well known that during those 22 years that Qur´an was revealed to Prophet SCWS some ayat were later on abrogated by Allah and some of them are still in Qur´an while some others were removed completely. Allah says:
"Such of Our revelations as we abrogate or cause to be forgotten, we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof. Knowest thou not that Allah is Able to do all things?"[2:106]
The ayah of stoning adulterers was abrogated, but eventhough the ayah was removed it´s hukm was left intact and didn´t change, because Prophet SCWS continued doing it and also his sahaba after him.
Here is a question about those hadiiths in Arabic (sorry no English):
http://www.islamqa.com/ar/ref/111382
لم ينفرد عمر بن الخطاب بمعرفة آية الرجم
في صحيح البخاري في باب الأحكام أن عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه قال : (لولا أن يقول الناس عن آية الرجم لكتبتها بيدي) لماذا لا يعلم هذه الآية سوى عمر ؟ وكيف نحاجج من يسأل ذلك ؟
الحمد لله
أولا :
روى البخاري (6830) ومسلم (1691) عن ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما أن عمر بن الخطاب صعد المنبر فخطب الجمعة ، وكان مما قال رضي الله عنه فقال : (إِنَّ اللَّهَ بَعَثَ مُحَمَّدًا صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِالْحَقِّ ، وَأَنْزَلَ عَلَيْهِ الْكِتَابَ ، فَكَانَ مِمَّا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ آيَةُ الرَّجْمِ ، فَقَرَأْنَاهَا ، وَعَقَلْنَاهَا ، وَوَعَيْنَاهَا ، رَجَمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَرَجَمْنَا بَعْدَهُ ، فَأَخْشَى إِنْ طَالَ بِالنَّاسِ زَمَانٌ أَنْ يَقُولَ قَائِلٌ : وَاللَّهِ مَا نَجِدُ آيَةَ الرَّجْمِ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ ، فَيَضِلُّوا بِتَرْكِ فَرِيضَةٍ أَنْزَلَهَا اللَّهُ ، وَالرَّجْمُ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ حَقٌّ عَلَى مَنْ زَنَى إِذَا أُحْصِنَ مِنْ الرِّجَالِ وَالنِّسَاءِ ، إِذَا قَامَتْ الْبَيِّنَةُ ، أَوْ كَانَ الْحَبَلُ ، أَوْ الِاعْتِرَافُ) . زاد أبو داود (4418) : (وَايْمُ اللَّهِ ، لَوْلَا أَنْ يَقُولَ النَّاسُ : زَادَ عُمَرُ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ ، لَكَتَبْتُهَا) وصححه الألباني في صحيح أبي داود .
هذا الحديث رواه البخاري في صحيحه في عدة مواضع : (6829) و(6830) في كتاب الحدود . و(7626) في كتاب الاعتصام بالكتاب والسنة ، وليس فيها اللفظ الوارد في السؤال (لولا أن يقول الناس.......إلخ) .
وقد ذكرها البخاري في كتاب الأحكام معلقة ، بلا إسناد : قال عمر : لولا أن يقول الناس زاد عمر في كتاب الله لكتبت آية الرجم بيدي .
ومثل هذا لا يقال فيه : رواه البخاري في صحيحه ، إلا أن يقال مع ذلك : إنه رواه معلقاً ، فيقال : رواه البخاري معلقاً .
وقد رواها أبو داود موصولةً وصححه الألباني كما سبق .
ثانياً :
يجاب على من يسألون: لماذا لم يعلم هذه الآية سوى عمر ؟
بأن يقال : لم ينفرد عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه بمعرفة هذه الآية ، فقد ورد عن جماعة من الصحابة إثباتها .
روى ابن ماجه (1944) عن عائشة رضي الله عنها قالت : (لقد نزلت آية الرجم ، وكانت في صحيفة تحت سريري) وحسنه الألباني في صحيح ابن ماجه .
وروى الإمام أحمد (1214) عن علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه إثباتها ، غير أن إسناده ضعيف .
وذكر الحافظ في "فتح الباري" أنه ورد إثبات هذه الآية عن أبي بن كعب وزيد بن ثابت رضي الله عنهما .
وقد أثبت عمر رضي الله عنه هذه الآية على المنبر في خطبة الجمعة ، وكان حاضراً في تلك الخطبة علماء الصحابة وفقهاؤهم وكبراؤهم ، وأقروه على إثبات هذه الآية ، ولم ينكر عليه أحد منهم ، فكيف يقال بعد ذلك : إنها لم يعلمها غير عمر ؟!
ثالثاً :
آية الرجم مما يذكره العلماء في "أصول الفقه" من مبحث "النسخ" أنها مما نسخ لفظه وبقي حكمه ، فلم تَعُدْ أية من القرآن الكريم ، ولكن حكمها باقٍ لم ينسخ ، ولعل هذا هو السبب الذي جعل عمر رضي الله عنه لا يكتبها في المصحف ، لأنها لما نسخت تلاوتها لم تَعُدْ من القرآن فلا يجوز أن تكتب فيه .
وانظر : "المنتقي شرح الموطأ" حديث رقم (1560) .
والله أعلم
And here´s something about naskh (abrogation):
Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the World; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all his Family and Companions.
al-Naskh, i.e. abrogation or repeal, has two meanings in Arabic: (1) transformation and shifting from one place to another, and (2) cancellation and repeal.
In technical terms, al-Naskh means to cancel and abrogate some fixed Shari'a rulings and to replace them with new rulings and orders.
al-Naskh can be in the Holy Qur'an and the Noble Sunnah. Allah Says (interpretation of meaning): {Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it. …}[2: 106]. He also Says: {And when We change a Verse [of the Qur'ân, i.e. cancel (abrogate) its order] in place of another, and Allâh knows the best of what He sends down, they (the disbelievers) say: "You (O Muhammad SAW) are but a Muftari! (forger, liar)." Nay, but most of them know not. Say (O Muhammad SAW) Ruh-ul-Qudus [Jibrael (Gabriel)] has brought it (the Qur'an) down from your Lord with truth, that it may make firm and strengthen (the Faith of) those who believe and as a guidance and glad tidings to those who have submitted (to Allâh as Muslims).} [16: 101-102].
As for al-Naskh in the Qur'an, it can be in any of the following modes:
1) To cancel a ruling and keep the text for reading (preference). Such as: (1) the verse of the will on behalf relatives [2: 180], (2) Surah al-Baqarah: 240, and (3) the verse of easing the task of fighting [8: 65].
2) To cancel a ruling and the text as well, like: ( "It was among the recitation (of the Qur'an): ten known times of suckling. This was about ruling of a child's suckling" [Reported by Imams al-Bukhari and Muslim ]).
3) To cancel only the text not the ruling, such as the verse concerning stoning the married one who commits Zina. It was as fallows: The married man and the married woman should be stoned if they commit Zina.
al-Naskh is only related to orders and prohibitions not the tidings.
As for number of al-Naskh, al-Suyuti in his book al-Itqaan said that, 'twenty-one verses in the Qur'an were abrogated; some were agreed upon, while others are not. These abrogated verses are in the following Surahs: Al-Baqarah, Al-'Imran, An-Nisa', Al-Ma'idah, Al-Anfal, At-Taubah, An-Nur, Al-Ahzab, Al-Mujadilah, Al-Mumtahinah and Al-Muzzammil.
As for wisdom behind al-Naskh, scholars of Islam said: 'change is the nature of existence and beings and abrogation is one of the Divine ways to address these changes. If al-Naskh is reasonable to apply to beings, then it should not be considered as strange concerning rulings about them since the Ummah is still developing and advancing towards what is better. In addition, Allah is Able to do everything and He is the Only Owner of this universe and He can do what He Wills. {He cannot be questioned as to what He does, while they will be questioned.} [21: 23].
Thus, al-Naskh constitutes a step towards what is better and superior. Al-Naskh is often a means of bringing ease and relief, since Muslims were required to follow what is higher, stronger and better in the first stage of education and building the Ummah. Thus, it was obligatory to perform Qiyam al-Lail (prayer at night) or that 20 Muslims were to face 200 of the enemy.
Then, al-Naskh of those rulings constituted a form of relief, of soothing, and cancellation of hardship. Another wisdom behind al-Naskh is to bring obedience to the Divine Orders.
Here, we state that abrogated rulings should not be put into practice, since they were revealed for some fixed period of time. For example, it is not allowed to put a doer of Zina in jail since such a ruling was abrogated. Another example is that it is not allowed for a woman whose husband has died to enter into Iddah (awaiting period) as stated in Surah 2: verse 240 since it is abrogated by verse 2. 234.
Finally, al-Naskh was done only by revelation and completed during the life of Allah's Messenger (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam), it is completely incorrect to be done by consensus or analogy.
Allah knows best.
