Soo Baxaa Feminists.

[Spursman]

you know who you are am all for women equal rights but feminists are extreme causing social problems for the family.

[Coeus]

[qoraxeey]

feministee baan ahaay

[Spursman]

[BlackVelvet]

I don't get it

Feminists were the women's sufforage activists, the ones who actually fought for the rights that we now freely enjoy. The phrase has been corrupted through the ages but I for one will never be ashamed of being a believer in equal rights, hail Emily Davison and the early ladies who by standing up for themselves, stood up for us all.

[James Dahl]

The things feminists advocate, equal pay for equal work, equal access to education and job advancement based on merit, and equal social freedoms, are hardly unreasonable.

Why shouldn't a smart woman or a woman who works hard at a job have the same opportunities for education or promotion as a man?

The man-hating wing of the lesbian empowerment movement has somewhat hijacked things, but you can't confuse those fruitcakes with mainstream feminists. That's like saying all Muslims support al-Qaeda

[Bamaarn]

Why shouldn't a smart woman or a woman who works hard at a job have the same opportunities for education or promotion as a man?

Because a woman is physically (and to an extent emotionally) weaker than a man. If a woman can only do half or quarter of what a man can do, why should she get paid equally? For instance, no female boxer can ever beat the world's heavyweight boxing champion; why would the strongest female boxer be paid equally? In a manual job, such as lifting jawaan from one point to another, a woman may lift half or quarter of what a man can; why should she get paid equally? In the battlefields, a female commander might hesitate to issue a critical order because of emotion; why should she get paid equally? The point is, women should get paid or awarded based on what they can accomplish.

[James Dahl]

Why shouldn't a smart woman or a woman who works hard at a job have the same opportunities for education or promotion as a man?

Because a woman is physically (and to an extent emotionally) weaker than a man. If a woman can only do half or quarter of what a man can do, why should she get paid equally? For instance, no female boxer can ever beat the world's heavyweight boxing champion; why would the strongest female boxer be paid equally? In a manual job, such as lifting jawaan from one point to another, a woman may lift half or quarter of what a man can; why should she get paid equally? In the battlefields, a female commander might hesitate to issue a critical order because of emotion; why should she get paid equally? The point is, women should get paid or awarded based on what they can accomplish.

You are misunderstanding feminism.
Feminism does not say that women should get paid as much as a stronger person in a strength-based job, or as much as a smarter person in an intelligence-based job, but rather that a woman should be paid as much as a man with the same qualifications (same strength, same intelligence, etc).
There are plenty of weak, stupid, over-emotional men, and lots of strong, intelligent, sociopathic women. Feminists argue that if a woman is a cold blooded and ruthless tactician, why shouldn't she be able to be in charge of an army regiment? If a woman is strong enough to carry the same amount as most of the men on a dock, why shouldn't she be paid the same?
You are confusing feminism with "affirmitive action", which is not merit based.

[grandpakhalif]

I don't understand why a believing women would look up to Western feminism like Emily or whatever when Allah SWT has guaranteed and freed women from suffurage 1400 years ago? Stuff and nonsense if you ask me...These so called muslim women should look up to Aisha, Khaadija, Sarah, Hagar etc..

[BlackVelvet]

Saudi Arabia is number one on the oppressors list that's why I didn't bother praising Aisha and co. because push comes to shove there is nothing much to show for the examples they made. Unless you look further afield to Bangladesh, Muslim countries are generally a disgrace when it comes to women's rights.

[Bamaarn]

Feminists argue that if a woman is a cold blooded and ruthless tactician, why shouldn't she be able to be in charge of an army regiment?

Because, unlike a man, the ruthless tactician can undergo a biological process, such as menstruation, that can affect her thinking, decisions, analyses, etc.

If a woman is strong enough to carry the same amount as most of the men on a dock, why shouldn't she be paid the same?

Women might perform well in a less demanding or menial job, but the example of the dock doesn't hold water. In literature or movies, I have never come across a female xamaali working on the dock.

Saudi Arabia is number one on the oppressors list that's why I didn't bother praising Aisha and co. because push comes to shove there is nothing much to show for the examples they made. Unless you look further afield to Bangladesh, Muslim countries are generally a disgrace when it comes to women's rights.

BV, is it true that you studied at a Catholic (or other denomination) school?

[grandpakhalif]

Saudi Arabia is number one on the oppressors list that's why I didn't bother praising Aisha and co. because push comes to shove there is nothing much to show for the examples they made. Unless you look further afield to Bangladesh, Muslim countries are generally a disgrace when it comes to women's rights.

Saudi Arabia is a poor representation of women's rights because they infuse their cultural beliefs with Islam. These western countries have not brought something new to the table, don't admire them as they transgress God's law, i.e revealing clothing, prostitution(modelling), devaluing marriage, devaluing homemakers, devaluing husband's rights etc...

Nothing but blasphemey

[BlackVelvet]

Feminists argue that if a woman is a cold blooded and ruthless tactician, why shouldn't she be able to be in charge of an army regiment?

Because, unlike a man, the ruthless tactician can undergo a biological process, such as menstruation, that can affect her thinking, decisions, analyses, etc.

If a woman is strong enough to carry the same amount as most of the men on a dock, why shouldn't she be paid the same?

Women might perform well in a less demanding or menial job, but the example of the dock doesn't hold water. In literature or movies, I have never come across a female xamaali working on the dock.

Saudi Arabia is number one on the oppressors list that's why I didn't bother praising Aisha and co. because push comes to shove there is nothing much to show for the examples they made. Unless you look further afield to Bangladesh, Muslim countries are generally a disgrace when it comes to women's rights.

BV, is it true that you studied at a Catholic (or other denomination) school?

Please go shoot yourself, from your posts it seems the best way you could add value to the world

[RuralMan08]

The rights of women are many:

The right to give birth
The right to have sex
The right to be fed
The right to be clothed


What else does she need?

[Bamaarn]

Please go shoot yourself, from your posts it seems the best way you could add value to the world

If I do that based on your advice, will you hold yourself responsible/accountable in this life and aakhiro?