
http://www.zeitschrift.co.uk/catholicch ... omalia.jpg
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Doesn't matter when it was built but it continued to be in service and Somalia had a Bishop who functioned fully until 1989.Bamaarn wrote:That church was built during the colonial times, therefore, this notion that Somalis were tolerant enough to let the fascists build it has no merit.
But the converts were not more than a dozen.Voltage wrote:Doesn't matter when it was built but it continued to be in service and Somalia had a Bishop who functioned fully until 1989.Bamaarn wrote:That church was built during the colonial times, therefore, this notion that Somalis were tolerant enough to let the fascists build it has no merit.
WRONG!grandpakhalif wrote:It's unislamic to be intolerant(to a certain degree) and I think pre civil war Somalia was the best representation of tolerance in modern muslim history
Building the church was illegal, because Somalis weren't consulted, nor did the fascists ask permission. So, it matters.Voltage wrote:Doesn't matter when it was built but it continued to be in service and Somalia had a Bishop who functioned fully until 1989.
Really? Pre-1969 where everything was based on tribe and affinities? Instead of even going as far as Christians where was tolerance for Madhibaan, Somali Bantu, and other foreigners? Children should stay in the play pen. Post-1969 Somalia where the vice president of the nation and defense minister was of the lowest caste and where women could get their inheritance individually rather than through clan or people could worship in their places of worship was the most tolerant of any period of Somalia.2ndtoNone wrote:WRONG!grandpakhalif wrote:It's unislamic to be intolerant(to a certain degree) and I think pre civil war Somalia was the best representation of tolerance in modern muslim history
I think pre- coup d'état (BEFORE 69) Somalia was the best representation of tolerance in modern muslim history
Because the Somali people have exponentially grown less educated, more ignorant, brutalized by fear and assumptions of faith which can be considered fringe, no?Leila25 wrote: But that is no longer the view of the majority of people.
And also not to forget the christian missionaries have become super active in trying to convert somalis affected by the civil war and are destitute and in need.Voltage wrote:Because the Somali people have exponentially grown less educated, more ignorant, brutalized by fear and assumptions of faith which can be considered fringe, no?Leila25 wrote: But that is no longer the view of the majority of people.
Building Churches by colonists might have been illegal but what about the responsibility of a Muslim Somali state post-independence to it's Christian minority? You do realize a Muslim state has obligations to its minorities from People of the Book (Christians and Jews) background? Do you accept this as fact? For example that even if the state has Sharia Law, the Law is applicable only to Muslims and non-Muslims are exempt or that People of the Book have the right to worship separately from the Muslim populace? You seem more of an activist and ignorant one at that and less as a knowledgeable individual and I think that is what is wrong with Muslims today.Bamaarn wrote:Building the church was illegal, because Somalis weren't consulted, nor did the fascists ask permission. So, it matters.