union wrote:The parrot, it's your prerogative if you want to stay in the dark ages. Hurling epithets at me won't change my support for research based science, free thinking, and human rights in the application of justice. Denying science and promoting ignorance is haram, chopping off someone's god given limbs is haram.
So you came out of the closset and claimed your real status
So Islam should be left in the dark ages where it belongs?
or you still beleive that you have the ability to reform the religion which in case would seem like you
disbelieved in this
""This day have I perfected for you your religion and completed My favor on you and chosen for you Islam as a religion. Qur'an 5:3"
what science do you mean?
For your info Secularism/Democracy is derived from the roman and greek empire and is not something new but rather borrowed heavily from the dark ages you like to dissociate from.
So tell me something new.
As for choping of the hand it is an established ruling and will never be abrogated from the scriptures till yomul qiyama.
But do you actually understand its ruling?
Or you think its just savagery hand chopping exercise.
I told you one again both you and shabaab are on the extremities.
Let me tell you of the ruling on when someones hand should be chopped according to the Islamic Jurisprudence.
A) If someone steals from the public treasury his hands are not supposed to be chopped.
B)If Someone leaves his valuables in the open and had enticed/tempted the thief then the perptrators hand is not chopped.
C) If the thieves motives were led by him wanting to ease his suffering like starving or in an agent need like money for hospital etc something that is basic for survival then his hands are not chopped of.
D)If the state is not offering Benefits like Zak ah then the state has no right to chop of the hands of the perpetrators as it did not cater for their needs.
E) The only time the hands are chopped is where it is resided over by an educated Qadi and has gathered solid evidence that the thief carried it out of ulterior motives that are not basic or necessary. Then the hand is chopped.
The chopping of the hand is a deterrent and would ensure that one knows of the consequences of his actions and in return shuns such practices.
Its not like it is something that requires russian ruellete to make a ruling on a suspect.