. I did some further research and found the chain of narrators to be completely rejected by the Major Muhaddiths and the narration is declared rejected............Sheikh Albani busts your so called proof and even gives it a chance, lets see what he has to say on the issue.This hadith was
reported by Abu Nu’aim in his book, al-Hillayyah. al-Haafidh ibn Hajar also
reported it in his book al-Issaba relating it to Muhammad ibn Uthman’s book of
history and as well as in al-Fath where he related it to al-Bazaar. The narrations
of this incident revolve around a person named Ishaaq ibn ‘Abdullah ibn Abi
Farwa. However, his hadith is rejected. Therefore, this incident can not be cited
as a proof.
Second, these thinkers also take as proof the gathering of the Muslims on
[Q]: Shaykh, the people who claim that demonstrations are lawful, use what has
been narrated in the Seerah to support their stance; i.e. When Umar bin al-
Khattab, (radiyallaahu anhu), accepted Islam - the Muslims marched in Makkah in
two rows; one row lead by Umar and the other by Hamzah, (radiyallaahu anhu).
They say this is a demonstration in which the Muslims openly disapproved of what
the Chiefs of Quraish were doing. What is your answer to this proof? The
[A]: 'My answer to this is how many times did this occur in the Islamic society?
Once? If it occurs only once would it be considered a Sunnah act which should be
followed? The Jurists stated that if a legal act of worship has been authentically
affirmed, its doer would be rewarded (yet) it is not appropriate to do it regularly
for the fear of it being thought of as a mandatory thing by people, or becoming a
part of their customs (such that they would not leave it aside)…
The Muslims never repeated this action afterwards even though they could have.
Many of the late rulers would bring about laws and rules which were against the
Shari'ah. Many people were imprisoned wrongly, probably even killed…so what is
the stance of the Muslim (during these Fitnah)? The Prophet, (sallallaahu alayhi
wa sallam), said in the authentic Hadeeth:
'obey the ruler even if he beats you and takes your money'.
The proofs used to support demonstrations, actually points to the ignorance of
those people in the Fiqh. It only occurred once… (I forgot to add something) I
remember that this has been reported in the Seerah, but I do not remember
whether it is authentic. If any of you know that this has been narrated in a
proper book of Hadeeth, let him remind me... [Allahu Akbar! Look at the
humbleness of the Shaykh, may Allah have mercy on him and admit him into
Jannah. Ameen]
Let us assume that this is authentic…It only occurred once, and if a thing only
occurs once, it does not become a Sunnah…such that we support what the Kaafirs
do, and cause the Muslims to go against the Sunnah. This is like a drop in an
ocean; it is not appropriate to use this as a proof.
I remember quite well that the Hanafi scholars, mentioned in a Fiqh
You could read the rest here.
http://calltoislam.com/pdf/Sayings%20Of ... ations.pdf
it seems you've been busted by spreading this rejected seerah narration
hows ottawack 
