
http://www.economist.com/node/21551494
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators


Separate governments means separate countrySagaashan wrote:Damn Africa, grow the fock up its the 21st century![]()
ps i hope the map is as misleading as listing s/l as a country

Meseret wrote:Now I am going to email them about the genocide in Khatumo and how Somalilands borders are fake.....



cantarabaqashabdi.ismail wrote:Democracy is just a bullshit smokesreen the gaalo invented to oppress poor countries. What matters is economic wealth and military power. I would rather live in an advanced and wealthy dictatorship than a poor, democratic and free country any day.

That's what Massa Whiteman has you believing, lakiin every civilisation from Babylon to Rome to Mughal India to Ottoman Turkey doesn't agree. Thinking and acting freely have nothing to do with democracy, you could do those things just as easily in a dictatorship. Dictatorship doesn't always = tyrant.Sagaashan wrote:cantarabaqashabdi.ismail wrote:Democracy is just a bullshit smokesreen the gaalo invented to oppress poor countries. What matters is economic wealth and military power. I would rather live in an advanced and wealthy dictatorship than a poor, democratic and free country any day.![]()
you have to be advanced and wealthy to live in a democratic and free country. it is when you let people think and act freely that you unleash their ingenuity and create markets for such skills.

abdi.ismail wrote:Democracy is just a bullshit smokesreen the gaalo invented to oppress poor countries. What matters is economic wealth and military power. I would rather live in an advanced and wealthy dictatorship than a poor, democratic and free country any day.


As long as the level of wealth inequality isn't too outrageous, the masses will be content with a benevolent dictatorship.Saraxnow wrote:abdi.ismail wrote:Democracy is just a bullshit smokesreen the gaalo invented to oppress poor countries. What matters is economic wealth and military power. I would rather live in an advanced and wealthy dictatorship than a poor, democratic and free country any day.Consulting and sharing the decision-making process with everyone else is healthy, some even say that it is a requirement for the ruler to do this and point to 'shura' command mentioned in the qur'an and our traditional elders have always done this.Sure gaalos throw the term around and use it as a smoke-screen to wage imperialist wars in Muslim countries, but in itself I see it as useful in that it's more of a less conflict-inducing way of running a country,especially when it's a poor one with few resources.Justice/fairness is more important than wealth,you can be a country rich in resources but still have poverty and lack of accountability, the ones that lack fairness are just cursed.

