Why do the amhara bastardize History

[Eaglehawk]

after having looked into ethiopian history I have found a deceptive trait of the amahars when it comes to history.
for example when they are talking to europeans they tell them that they were african christian kingdom, they are intentionally playing into the european myth of Prester John, so the amahars would play with words and label their tribal chiefs as Kings and emperors.

the amharas are the one that created the fake history of the oromos, according to them the oromo migrated from Madagascar
you would hear a amahara saying that Abyssinia was great kindom when we somalis know that it was poor desolate tribal country were the remnant Christians of horn of afrfica lived

here is the picture of the imposter menelik

notice that cloths that he is warring
he is warring trousers that are importet from india
there is absolutly noting autauntic about amahar culture so where is the by product of the great abysinian kingdom, even the amahara castle at gondar was build by the portagese
once again abysinia was noting more then christian outpost of the Byzantium empire and Byzantium was gone these poor tribal amharas had no clue of were to start with building a state or a civilasation and they got lucky when europeans discovered them in the mountains of ethiopia
I always loughwhen ethiopians say am from ethiopia, that shows you once again there ignorance about the ethiopian and it racist undertone ...ethiopia= burnface land

[Eaglehawk]

were is that ogaden historian of ethiopian called the_patriot

[sahal80]

after having looked into ethiopian history I have found a deceptive trait of the amahars when it comes to history.
for example when they are talking to europeans they tell them that they were african christian kingdom, they are intentionally playing into the european myth of Prester John, so the amahars would play with words and label their tribal chiefs as Kings and emperors.

the amharas are the one that created the fake history of the oromos, according to them the oromo migrated from Madagascar
you would hear a amahara saying that Abyssinia was great kindom when we somalis know that it was poor desolate tribal country were the remnant Christians of horn of afrfica lived

here is the picture of the imposter menelik

notice that cloths that he is warring
he is warring trousers that are importet from india
there is absolutly noting autauntic about amahar culture so where is the by product of the great abysinian kingdom, even the amahara castle at gondar was build by the portagese
once again abysinia was noting more then christian outpost of the Byzantium empire and Byzantium was gone these poor tribal amharas had no clue of were to start with building a state or a civilasation and they got lucky when europeans discovered them in the mountains of ethiopia
I always loughwhen ethiopians say am from ethiopia, that shows you once again there ignorance about the ethiopian and it racist undertone ...ethiopia= burnface land

Great historical info.
What you just said is much related to the abyssinia of the middle ages, the glory of abyssinia has been there during the 4th, and 5th centuries, they had conqured cush sudan, they also conqured twice southren arabia, once by a call from saba state againist hadramout state. They use to play in south arabia the same role they play now in somalia. Their last invasion of yemen was mentioned in the surat al burouj to save as-haab al ukhdood christians from the himyar jewish king thu nuwas, they remained there 70 years tillthe persians have explled them.
The new ethiopia is made by the amhara, since then they forgot arabia and moved toward the muslim somali state.

[Khalid Ali]

Good post Eagle the Amhaaras tell the western world they are the christian Kings of Africa eventhough Christianity reached them much later only a minority of them were christian in the second century and third century. The Tigrayans were Christians and Eritrean highlanders. But as you said amhaaras play the superior role when they are around oromos the galla slaves. But the Amhaaras are a wide nationality Amhaaras claim that they are not an ethnic group some say that they are the protectors of the Christian faith and not really an Ethnic group. Where ever they capture they leave a foot print Emperor Menelik the second is such a product of Amhaara looting Sidamo and Oromo and gambeele. Meneliks mother was a slave girl from the gambeele region thats why Menelik looks like a bantu. Its true that the Amhaaras always love to imitate exisiting rulers around the world they claim they are the symbol of Ethiopia and Ethiopian history is amhaara history.

Sahal you are confusing two empires the aksumite Empire consisted mostly of Tigrayan and Eritrean eagle is talking about the so called solomonic dynasty which started just after the agaw zagwe dynasty in the 12 century. Which was mostly a line of Emperors of Amhaaras so called royal Blood the line didnt only consist of Amhaara father lineages the Solomonic Empire had agaws with Amhaara royal blood oromo with Amhaara royal blood Tigrayan with Amhaara royal blood. Since they were an expansion force they let the Emperors come from different Ethnic groups but all those Emperors claimed they nobility through either an Amhaara royal grandmother or an Amhaara royal mother or he him self is an Amhaara descent. This is why the Abesinyan Empire is not considered an Amhaara tribal royal family But an Ethiopian royal family Thats why u have a statue of Menelik the second in addis ababe build by oromos when it was called Finfine. But eagle made a good point that the Ethiopian rulers always want to imitate existed leaders or Empires they let it influance very much.

[sahal80]

Good post Eagle the Amhaaras tell the western world they are the christian Kings of Africa eventhough Christianity reached them much later only a minority of them were christian in the second century and third century. The Tigrayans were Christians and Eritrean highlanders. But as you said amhaaras play the superior role when they are around oromos the galla slaves. But the Amhaaras are a wide nationality Amhaaras claim that they are not an ethnic group some say that they are the protectors of the Christian faith and not really an Ethnic group. Where ever they capture they leave a foot print Emperor Menelik the second is such a product of Amhaara looting Sidamo and Oromo and gambeele. Meneliks mother was a slave girl from the gambeele region thats why Menelik looks like a bantu. Its true that the Amhaaras always love to imitate exisiting rulers around the world they claim they are the symbol of Ethiopia and Ethiopian history is amhaara history.

Sahal you are confusing two empires the aksumite Empire consisted mostly of Tigrayan and Eritrean eagle is talking about the so called solomonic dynasty which started just after the agaw zagwe dynasty in the 12 century. Which was mostly a line of Emperors of Amhaaras so called royal Blood the line didnt only consist of Amhaara father lineages the Solomonic Empire had agaws with Amhaara royal blood oromo with Amhaara royal blood Tigrayan with Amhaara royal blood. Since they were an expansion force they let the Emperors come from different Ethnic groups but all those Emperors claimed they nobility through either an Amhaara royal grandmother or an Amhaara royal mother or he him self is an Amhaara descent. This is why the Abesinyan Empire is not considered an Amhaara tribal royal family But an Ethiopian royal family Thats why u have a statue of Menelik the second in addis ababe build by oromos when it was called Finfine. But eagle made a good point that the Ethiopian rulers always want to imitate existed leaders or Empires they let it influance very much.

ok, I tought he was talking about abyssinia.

[Eaglehawk]

here is another thread that i made about the ethiopians and their history
its part of my near abroad series, I am encouraging beesha sade study, peoples and their geographies around beesha sade sphere of influence
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=310782

[MidriGeez]

after having looked into ethiopian history I have found a deceptive trait of the amahars when it comes to history.
for example when they are talking to europeans they tell them that they were african christian kingdom, they are intentionally playing into the european myth of Prester John, so the amahars would play with words and label their tribal chiefs as Kings and emperors.

the amharas are the one that created the fake history of the oromos, according to them the oromo migrated from Madagascar
you would hear a amahara saying that Abyssinia was great kindom when we somalis know that it was poor desolate tribal country were the remnant Christians of horn of afrfica lived

here is the picture of the imposter menelik

notice that cloths that he is warring
he is warring trousers that are importet from india
there is absolutly noting autauntic about amahar culture so where is the by product of the great abysinian kingdom, even the amahara castle at gondar was build by the portagese
once again abysinia was noting more then christian outpost of the Byzantium empire and Byzantium was gone these poor tribal amharas had no clue of were to start with building a state or a civilasation and they got lucky when europeans discovered them in the mountains of ethiopia
I always loughwhen ethiopians say am from ethiopia, that shows you once again there ignorance about the ethiopian and it racist undertone ...ethiopia= burnface land

Great historical info.
What you just said is much related to the abyssinia of the middle ages, the glory of abyssinia has been there during the 4th, and 5th centuries, they had conqured cush sudan, they also conqured twice southren arabia, once by a call from saba state againist hadramout state. They use to play in south arabia the same role they play now in somalia. Their last invasion of yemen was mentioned in the surat al burouj to save as-haab al ukhdood christians from the himyar jewish king thu nuwas, they remained there 70 years tillthe persians have explled them.
The new ethiopia is made by the amhara, since then they forgot arabia and moved toward the muslim somali state.

Bahahahahahaha sorry i couldn't help it, Abbysinia didn't conquer Kush, It was Axum and their entrance to arabia was more impressive than their exit, their king head was cut off. We call amhara fairytalers, Ask an amhara of his origin once a week for a month and he would tell you a different origin every week.lol

[herndonhomer]

abyssinia is for sure one of the most important african civilizations of this millennium. i've come across some greek people in my life who have the same last names as ethiopians (tawodros and agnew). does this points to some kind of ancient connection between greece and ethiopia?

[sahal80]

after having looked into ethiopian history I have found a deceptive trait of the amahars when it comes to history.
for example when they are talking to europeans they tell them that they were african christian kingdom, they are intentionally playing into the european myth of Prester John, so the amahars would play with words and label their tribal chiefs as Kings and emperors.

the amharas are the one that created the fake history of the oromos, according to them the oromo migrated from Madagascar
you would hear a amahara saying that Abyssinia was great kindom when we somalis know that it was poor desolate tribal country were the remnant Christians of horn of afrfica lived

here is the picture of the imposter menelik

notice that cloths that he is warring
he is warring trousers that are importet from india
there is absolutly noting autauntic about amahar culture so where is the by product of the great abysinian kingdom, even the amahara castle at gondar was build by the portagese
once again abysinia was noting more then christian outpost of the Byzantium empire and Byzantium was gone these poor tribal amharas had no clue of were to start with building a state or a civilasation and they got lucky when europeans discovered them in the mountains of ethiopia
I always loughwhen ethiopians say am from ethiopia, that shows you once again there ignorance about the ethiopian and it racist undertone ...ethiopia= burnface land

Great historical info.
What you just said is much related to the abyssinia of the middle ages, the glory of abyssinia has been there during the 4th, and 5th centuries, they had conqured cush sudan, they also conqured twice southren arabia, once by a call from saba state againist hadramout state. They use to play in south arabia the same role they play now in somalia. Their last invasion of yemen was mentioned in the surat al burouj to save as-haab al ukhdood christians from the himyar jewish king thu nuwas, they remained there 70 years tillthe persians have explled them.
The new ethiopia is made by the amhara, since then they forgot arabia and moved toward the muslim somali state.

Bahahahahahaha sorry i couldn't help it, Abbysinia didn't conquer Kush, It was Axum and their entrance to arabia was more impressive than their exit, their king head was cut off. We call amhara fairytalers, Ask an amhara of his origin once a week for a month and he would tell you a different origin every week.lol

The aksumites and the abyssinians were the same people. The pre-aksumites can still be called abyssinians though they were more like sabaeans because their queen makeda was the same southren arabia queen called al maqah or bilqis. they had worshiped the same south arabian gods like 3ashtaar and mahrem, even the emperor kalebs royal title was the king of saba, dhu raydan,hadramout and yamanat and of their arabs on the plateau and the lowland.

[sahal80]

abyssinia is for sure one of the most important african civilizations of this millennium. i've come across some greek people in my life who have the same last names as ethiopians (tawodros and agnew). does this points to some kind of ancient connection between greece and ethiopia?

they were part of the civilized world. When abraha has built his cathedral in sana to raval the kaba he called it qullays from the greek word ekklesia or aclecial in english!!!