SomaliNet Forums

I am not trying to educate anything. We are sharing each others opinion or understanding ok.


Here is very powerful statement.. It has his validity...


Here is the statements...

All the terrorist in Somalia are muslims. Mohamed hassan is Somali and Muslim. Therefore, Muhammad Hassan is a terrorist.

So please how do you respond to that question.. What is the wrong this analogy...

Let's be productive and discuss this..

Because the last sentence is very true....

Mohamed Hassan is Somali and muslim

What is the reasoning here.. Let's discuss step by step please...

You're first statement would have say "All Muslims in Somalia are Terrorist" Otherwise it doesn't make sense

Afisoone your so annoying breh gtfo terrorist yaho

Thuganomics wrote:You're first statement would have say "All Muslims in Somalia are Terrorist" Otherwise it doesn't make sense

If I had said "all muslims", then you will find out there is a problem because I generalised it...


Here I am giving you two statements that is very true.. The first statement is true.. The second statements is true too..

I need to know you are reasoning..

Read the statements and the conclusion. Let me see how your respond...



Trust me I will give you the real answer. But I want you to think little bit. I know it is confusing to you.. It is called critical thinking...

afisone do you think we are idiots?

this is very simple.

All terrorists in Somalia are muslims, but are all somali muslims terrorists? If not then, you can not conclude that muhammad xassan who is somali and muslim is also a terrorists.

You said
All A are B
C is B
Therefore C is also A

But A =/= B

it is hypothetical..
Let us say the two statements are true..



Here is the statements...

All the terrorist in Somalia are muslims. Mohamed hassan is Somali and Muslim. Therefore, Muhammad Hassan is a terrorist.

How do you reason from here?


Let's go,,,,,

What makes Mohamed Hassan a terrorist? All you told us in that statement is that he's a Somali and a Muslim. Going by that, then all muslims somalis must be terrorists.

afisone, the last part is wrong conclusion unless what you posted is out of larger context. Saying all somali terrorists are muslims doesn't make Hasan or Farah a terrorist, does it?

If I say all gays in the UK are British, will that make everyone in the UK gay?

i dnt see any need for critical thinking here

Perfect_Order wrote:afisone do you think we are idiots?

this is very simple.

All terrorists in Somalia are muslims, but are all somali muslims terrorists? If not then, you can not conclude that muhammad xassan who is somali and muslim is also a terrorists.

You said
All A are B
C is B
Therefore C is also A

But A =/= B

why not?
I need an explanation... It is like..

51% percent of american will vote for Democrat. Obama is Democrat.. Therefore, Obama will win re-election..

What is the difference.. If you believe Obama is going to win.. Then you must believe Mohamed Hassan is a Terrorist...


Go Ahead.....

We are in court room..

waryaa wrote:afisone, the last part is wrong conclusion unless what you posted is out of larger context. Saying all somali terrorists are muslims doesn't make Hasan or Farah a terrorist, does it?

If I say all gays in the UK are British, will that make everyone in the UK gay?

i dnt see any need for critical thinking here

Waryaa please go back and read the statement again please?

I did not generalise anything..

I said all gays who have aids are British.. James is gay.. Therefore, James have aids.................
That is similar to my old statements..

Yes I understand that you guys get the point... I need explanation...

I answered to last response the correct way..


Here is the correct..

All the statements and the conclusion can be True.. But it is still the argument is false untill we prove it,.. That is how you answer..

I know it is tough... That is why we as muslims do not take anything without evidence....

ur final answer ain't different than what u have already been told

afisoone with all due respect are you retarded? whats there to explain its common sense

Hiloowle wrote:afisoone with all due respect are you retarded? whats there to explain its common sense

Hiloowle you always come last..



Waryaa you said the conclusion is wrong.. How do you know it was wrong... If you were in court room and you said it wrong and you don't have something to prove it then, that is a serious violation..........................


To question about the statement whether is wrong or right is false... Because all the statement is correct......


You all respond about the statements.. Other than asking the evidence. That is why you wrong..

You know what I mean? I know it is tough to understand stuff like this..