Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
Moderator: Moderators
- Lionheart10
- SomaliNetizen

- Posts: 567
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:56 am
- Location: Realms of impossibility
Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
He was involved in a major car crash that left him unable to do most of his job. Thus, Mohamed Ali Samatar was given the responsibility of making several decisions. He even admitted to being the mastermind of the bombings in northern Somalia.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
The car incident happened late 89 and HRG bombings took place from May 88 and onwards
- Lionheart10
- SomaliNetizen

- Posts: 567
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:56 am
- Location: Realms of impossibility
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
I'm pretty sure it happened in '86.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
No sxb it happened 89 maybe even 90Lionheart10 wrote:I'm pretty sure it happened in '86.
- Lionheart10
- SomaliNetizen

- Posts: 567
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:56 am
- Location: Realms of impossibility
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
AP , Associated Press
Jun. 21, 1986 10:01 PM ET
ROME (AP) _ Somali President Siad Barre has been released from a Saudi Arabian hospital after recovering from injuries suffered in a car accident last month, the Somali Embassy here announced Saturday.
An embassy statement said Barre would return to Somalia in 48 hours.
The 67-year-old president was injured in a car accident near the Somali capital, Mogadishu, on May 23. Mogadishu Radio said the president's car overturned in torrential rains. At the time, a Saudi newspaper quoted Saudi doctors as saying Barre suffered head and chest injuries.
Saudi Arabian King Fahd sent a medically equipped airplane of the Royal Saudi Air Force to transport Barre to Riyadh for treatment.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
I stand corrected.I swear somebody not long mentioned that incident on this site and I was sure they said it happened very late 80s
- Lionheart10
- SomaliNetizen

- Posts: 567
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:56 am
- Location: Realms of impossibility
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
It happened in 1986, and it led to a power struggle between members of the SPRC and his immediate family and clan.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
Did he diminish mentaly or just phisiscaly.Funny enough I was listening to a report during Samatar's recent court hearings and there was ine man who was qquoted as sayingLionheart10 wrote:It happened in 1986, and it led to a power struggle between members of the SPRC and his immediate family and clan.
Allahu Aclam though.Laakiin at the end of the day the buck stops with the head of stateBarre was against the extreme measures that Smatar was calling for i.e Air sorties against the North bit it was Samatar who pushed for them since he was the Defence Minister
- Lionheart10
- SomaliNetizen

- Posts: 567
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:56 am
- Location: Realms of impossibility
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
I'm not saying he was completely 100% innocent laakiin I even listened to a video on youtube with samatar saying something in broken english like "I give the final order because I was in charge."
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
That was the tape he denied making and was brought to court along with the BBC reporter that interviewed himLionheart10 wrote:I'm not saying he was completely 100% innocent laakiin I even listened to a video on youtube with samatar saying something in broken english like "I give the final order because I was in charge."
- STARKAST
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 5150
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:07 am
- Location: Bale mountains, Somali Galbeed
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
You're getting close too their cards Lionheart10.
That airstrike is the key tool for indoctrination for their offspring and is 'key' (worthless in my/most somalis eyes) to secession (a Disneyland obsession)
Prosperity and Unity - My cards.
That airstrike is the key tool for indoctrination for their offspring and is 'key' (worthless in my/most somalis eyes) to secession (a Disneyland obsession)
Prosperity and Unity - My cards.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
Thread kasta uskag ku xaara ka waayi meysid WTF!
I'm out of here
I'm out of here
- Lionheart10
- SomaliNetizen

- Posts: 567
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:56 am
- Location: Realms of impossibility
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
So are you trying to say it didn't happen or are you trying to say it wasn't an important period in shaping the history of Somalia?STARKAST wrote:You're getting close too their cards Lionheart10.
That airstrike is the key tool for indoctrination for their offspring and is 'key' (worthless in my/most somalis eyes) to secession (a Disneyland obsession)
Prosperity and Unity - My cards.
- STARKAST
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 5150
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:07 am
- Location: Bale mountains, Somali Galbeed
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
History and life is made up of excuses to disguise weakness...The whole SL project.
The reason why a certain clan wants succession (taking other clans hostage on both flanks) is because they can't hold their own weight and DEMAND power which is rightfully theirs - equal power(even federalism is accepptable - which will happen).....So they decided to start a enclave and share power between 1 clan. Pathetic.
The reason why a certain clan wants succession (taking other clans hostage on both flanks) is because they can't hold their own weight and DEMAND power which is rightfully theirs - equal power(even federalism is accepptable - which will happen).....So they decided to start a enclave and share power between 1 clan. Pathetic.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: Siad Barre wasn't responsible for 1988
Noticed he did not adress neither of Lionhearts questions but rather went off in another meaninglies tangent.Which has nothing whatsover to do with the subject at hand.Typical tactics of the cowerd and the sneak
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 36 Replies
- 3419 Views
-
Last post by Hassan_Galshiredle
-
- 0 Replies
- 360 Views
-
Last post by luis1
-
- 32 Replies
- 2903 Views
-
Last post by luis1
-
- 28 Replies
- 1867 Views
-
Last post by original dervish
-
- 17 Replies
- 5418 Views
-
Last post by Nite_Rida
-
- 12 Replies
- 3250 Views
-
Last post by udun
-
- 8 Replies
- 3084 Views
-
Last post by soonoqoda
-
- 36 Replies
- 9897 Views
-
Last post by Executive
-
- 4 Replies
- 2221 Views
-
Last post by luis1
-
- 2 Replies
- 1721 Views
-
Last post by The_Emperior5