My suspicions have been confirmed
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:32 pm
In my earlier topic surmising the real purpose of the Vote of Confidence has been confirmed. I believed that the real agenda behind the public motion specifically directed at the personage of the PM was to coerce a resignation. From the number of MP's signing the motion, to their names not being officially disclosed, effectively preventing any possible chance to sway the mp's by Saacid's group, to now preventing the PM from addressing Parliament.
viewtopic.php?f=250&t=338680
As I said in the former topic, a Vote of Confidence is against the whole government and can not be directed at a PM only.
Now the real question is, will the PM resign or will he let his whole government face the vote, and effictely bringing it down. From the beginning there was no chance that Saacid would survive but how he would go. So far he has carried himself with superb dignity in the face of a ruthless oppposition. Will he leave humiliated and blamed for the failures of the government, or will he say this government was more than me and the failures are shared?
viewtopic.php?f=250&t=338680
As I said in the former topic, a Vote of Confidence is against the whole government and can not be directed at a PM only.
Now the real question is, will the PM resign or will he let his whole government face the vote, and effictely bringing it down. From the beginning there was no chance that Saacid would survive but how he would go. So far he has carried himself with superb dignity in the face of a ruthless oppposition. Will he leave humiliated and blamed for the failures of the government, or will he say this government was more than me and the failures are shared?