The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Dedicated for Somaliland politics and affairs.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by X.Playa »

1-They claim that since they didn't sign a treay with the British they are not part of Somaliland.

2-When they go deep into their fantasy they claim they were part of Dervish-land and their emperor was Ina Carro a.k.a The Mad Mullah and only after the destruction of their Taleex empire did they have became a British subjects by force not by choice.

But my question is , is or was somaliland based on the 1881-1889 tribal treaties ???

My second question to the Isaaq is, do we claim that dhulos/Warsangali are part of Somaliland as people or do we argue that the eastern territory are part of somaliland as a territory regardless what these clan believe.?

My third question is , Do you think its wise to change the historical borders of Somaliland and let these Daarood go join Puntland?? and what effect that might have on future somaliland clans both the Isaaq and gedabursi.?
Last edited by X.Playa on Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HusseinHassan
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2980
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:12 pm
Location: Somalinet boycott by Puntites in effect 24/12/14

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by HusseinHassan »

X.Playa wrote:1-They claim that since they didn't sign a treay with the British they are not part of Somaliland.

2-When they go deep into their fantasy they claim they were part of Dervish-land and their emperor was Ina Carro a.k.a The Mad Mullah and only after the destruction of their Taleex empire did they have became a British subjects.

But my question is , is or was somaliland based on the 1881-1889 tribal treaties ???

My second question to the Isaaq is, do we claim that dhulos/Warsangali are part of Somaliland as people or do we argue that the eastern territory are part of somaliland.?

My third question is , Do you think its wise to change the historical borders of Somaliland and let these Daarood go join Puntland?? and what effect that might have on future somaliland clans both the Isaaq and gedabursi.?
abdiweli and ina camay are not in office for 24 hours and they already got x.playa shitting on his pants, asking questions he never asked, trying to seek the truth :lol:
brings me back to this poem :pac:
Iidoor sal fududaa wuxuu sugayo muu dhawro.
User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by X.Playa »

abdiweli ina cami?? what is that a food or a drink, never heared of them.
User avatar
samatar133
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2342
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:11 am

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by samatar133 »

The silliest of ideas is to entertain to change our historic borders and to give up parts of our land to other countries.
Not one inch of our country will be ceded to Somalia. We will either have all Somaliland or none, no compromise between those two.
User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by X.Playa »

Even entertaining that idea itself is suicide and sadly most Isaaq elites have no problem with it at all.
User avatar
SultanOrder
Posts: 21695
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Peace!

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by SultanOrder »

Most Isaaq's have no problem at all with it because it is based on reality. Somalia has more right to Somaliland than Somaliland will ever have to Bari.
User avatar
Meyle
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3519
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:36 pm

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by Meyle »

The British signed treaties with the coastal tribes so the whole argument that they didn't sign because they didn't want to, is invalid.


As Samatar said its either all of SL or none of it.
User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by X.Playa »

Perfect_Order wrote:Most Isaaq's have no problem at all with it because it is based on reality. Somalia has more right to Somaliland than Somaliland will ever have to Bari.

How so and based on what right??
User avatar
Meyle
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3519
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:36 pm

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by Meyle »

Perfect_Order wrote:Most Isaaq's have no problem at all with it because it is based on reality. Somalia has more right to Somaliland than Somaliland will ever have to Bari.


So former Somalia Italiana has more right to former British Somaliland than former British Somaliland got to Sool and Sanaag? :pac:
User avatar
Hodan94
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4931
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:16 pm
Location: cirka iyo dhulka dhexdooda.

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by Hodan94 »

Why is the harti gettting hyped up over their new tribal boqor abdiweli? Lets see what this 'educated' guy as his fellow cousins say can acheive....a piece of paper doesnt always make you competent in this particular job.
I say congrats to him, but he better be carefull with his attitude towards both somaliland and somalia government
User avatar
samatar133
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2342
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:11 am

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by samatar133 »

X.Playa wrote:Even entertaining that idea itself is suicide and sadly most Isaaq elites have no problem with it at all.
I am not aware of SL elites entertaining that kind of idea. I am sure that a reunion with Somalia, unthinkable at the moment, is more acceptable to the relevant elites than diving Somaliland.
User avatar
PrinceDaadi
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2442
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:32 pm
Location: Daadi Island

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by PrinceDaadi »

I normally do support SL leaving the union because I always advocate people should have the right to their destiny! now assuming that Sool and eastern sanaag are part of SL(which they r disputing but for argument sake) and they want not to be with SL, dont they have same rights which Allowed SL to leave the union?
User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by X.Playa »

No they don't , no tribe has the right in Africa to seced. A territory yes given a historical legal argument , but just because they happened to be Daarood that hate Isaaq that doesn't give them any unique right in Africa to change colonial borders.
original dervish
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 29468
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:08 pm

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by original dervish »

If there is ever to be an international border between Somalia and "somaliland", it will be between iidoor & Dhulbahante.
PS We are not just fighting for ourselves to remain in Somalia....we're also fighting to make sure the iidoor don't secede.
User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: The Khaatumo argument against somaliland.

Post by X.Playa »

You can live in that fantasy and wobble in it merrily like a donkey in a dustbath, facts and history says otherwise. There in Africa colonial borders are sacrossanct there is nothing can be changed . The Dhulbahnate will not and cant make a new precedents.
Locked
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Politics - Somaliland”