SomaliNet Forums

You'd have 2 states led by Daroods. 2 States led by Hawiyes. 1 State led by D&M.

I don't understand how south mudug will be a gobol. Is it not unconstitutional??

thegoodshepherd wrote:I don't understand how south mudug will be a gobol. Is it not unconstitutional??

Miskeen wallahi u think hawiye goes by the constitution in their own kingdom u think darod can dictate hawiye some ppl r so deluded kkkkkkkkkkkkkk u think ucan beat hawiye? Y did u fool urself to begin with? Miskeen

Ironic, because Hawiye is the only somali clan to be colonized by another somali clan

Dictator Kacankii made these 18 gobols of Somalia and the SFG may amend them in order to modernise the modern politics of Somalia, so, south Mudug may be added to Galgaduud as one gobol.

Hiiran, Shabele and Galgaduud may then become a Federal State. It is up to the people of those regions to decide and all open for further discussions.

Ron wrote:Dictator Kacankii made these 18 gobols of Somalia and the SFG may amend them in order to modernise the modern politics of Somalia, so, south Mudug may be added to Galgaduud as one gobol.

Hiiran, Shabele and Galgaduud may then become a Federal State. It is up to the people of those regions to decide and all open for further discussions.

You see this is where everything goes wrong. You say amendment, but where can the line be drawn for this? If a former region can be cut in half and swapped, other regions like Hiraan can claim to be two regions due to historic clan differences, same with many other regions.

Marques wrote: You see this is where everything goes wrong. You say amendment, but where can the line be drawn for this? If a former region can be cut in half and swapped, other regions like Hiraan can claim to be two regions due to historic clan differences, same with many other regions.

But the Italians already made a green line in Mudug even during the colonial period.
Everything north of the green line was a protectorate, everything south a colony.
So there actually is a historic precedent for seperating Mudug.

Hiraan on the other hand has always been a gobol, it is the last of the original gobols of 1960, it was never divided but always united.

thegoodshepherd wrote:

Marques wrote: You see this is where everything goes wrong. You say amendment, but where can the line be drawn for this? If a former region can be cut in half and swapped, other regions like Hiraan can claim to be two regions due to historic clan differences, same with many other regions.

But the Italians already made a green line in Mudug even during the colonial period.
Everything north of the green line was a protectorate, everything south a colony.
So there actually is a historic precedent for seperating Mudug.

Hiraan on the other hand has always been a gobol, it is the last of the original gobols of 1960, it was never divided but always united.

Well then you are contradicting your initial arguement, you claim South Mudug is unconstitutional, but here you are justifying that it is a special case.