Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
Ok in short, these airstrikes in Syria are nothing more than a 'payback' to how Russia annexed Crimea and won the proxy war in Ukraine, eventually Russia and the US will make direct contact and they will clash, nuclear war, when this nuclear war ends, life as you know it in the west will be no more, then America's love child Israel will assume the throne of the world.
The ultimate implication of such a success in Syria is that NATO will then get what the Zionists desperately want, i.e., nuclear war with Russia. It now seems inevitable that such a nuclear war will take place and that it will occur sooner rather than later. When that war takes place within the next 5-10 years time or even sooner, the world will experience the Malhama or Armageddon which Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu 'alaihi wa sallam) prophesied 1400 years ago.
It is time enough for analysts around the world to direct primary attention to the coming nuclear war. Islamic eschatology is best equipped to offer a comprehensive explanation of the subject.
Our Islamic eschatological view is that Pax Judaica is not possible without such a nuclear war which, it is hoped, will wipe out both Russia and her NATO rivals. Our view is that Dajjāl's 'day-like-a-week' will commence with the Malhama when Israel emerges from the nuclear holocaust to succeed USA as the ruling State in a post-nuclear world.
Last edited by ZubeirAwal on Sun Sep 28, 2014 8:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
In the event of a nuclear war between the east and the west, ur best bet would be to live as far away as possible from cities and high value target areas. Each side would target major population centers, military installations, and everything else.
It's times like this most of us wished we lived in Somalia. Only concern would be the fallout, that would work it's way to Somalia.
Look at it this way, when your time comes, ur time comes. Nothing you can really do about it.
Also, do you even know what a Nuclear war would do?
The bomb on Japan only used few grams of Uranium and it caused so much destruction. Imagine if all the Uranium in that bomb reacted????
Nuclear war would kill everyone on the planet instantly we don't need it stop asking for mass destruction.
It won't kill everyone instantly. Only those that live in the blast area. You only have to worry about radiation. If u live, say, DC, NYC, L.A, or London.......then u def are fucked, since the Russians would be targeting those cities with multiple nuclear blasts to make sure.
How am i being spineless ? Nuclear war will kill everyone that is true why are you throwing insults?
go look up what the original nuclear bomb that was dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was made of and see how much Uranium was used to destroy those place.
Conspiracy nut websites won't help with anything man.
Mutually assured destruction is still in play and that means no war until some new technology changes things.
Unfortunatley it is around the corner, Graphene will enable Ultra capacitors that will make Railguns/Coil Guns feasible , along with increased processing power of computers and better radar more advanced AESA and distributed multi redundant datalinks.
All this means that you can survive a first attack by getting most missiles, and you can counter attack.
whoever wins the anti-missile race wins the war, and if those in power think they have a chance against russia even a little they will attack immediately.
We are about 20 years to that level of technology.
maybe another 20 too so 40 years.
nuclear war is inevitable.
if those fuckers think they have a tiny chance they will take it all the way.
Mutually assured destruction is still in play and that means no war until some new technology changes things.
Unfortunatley it is around the corner, Graphene will enable Ultra capacitors that will make Railguns/Coil Guns feasible , along with increased processing power of computers and better radar more advanced AESA and distributed multi redundant datalinks.
All this means that you can survive a first attack by getting most missiles, and you can counter attack.
whoever wins the anti-missile race wins the war, and if those in power think they have a chance against russia even a little they will attack immediately.
We are about 20 years to that level of technology.
maybe another 20 too so 40 years.
nuclear war is inevitable.
if those fuckers think they have a tiny chance they will take it all the way.
Gamer if they use a few weapons Europe and North America as a whole would be fucked. The only safe place would be Africa , Argentina and Australia but these crazy fucks have thousands of Nuclear weapons they can destroy humanity over and over again if they want to
You don't need to worry about nukes or any major/total war occurring until anti nuke defense system that is installed all over the country (cities, deserts and countryside) and can cover ever square meter of the country, And the defense system must be 99.99% effective. When such a thing happens the waging of war and dynamics of diplomacy will be reversing back to ww2. As in countries will be waging highly devastating and costly conventional war such as what happened in WW2. Although its still messed up, i prefer this. Nukes are a cop out.
gurey25 wrote:
whoever wins the anti-missile race wins the war, and if those in power think they have a chance against russia even a little they will attack immediately.
We are about 20 years to that level of technology.
maybe another 20 too so 40 years.
nuclear war is inevitable.
if those fuckers think they have a tiny chance they will take it all the way.
Anti Missile won't do anything, since most nuclear missiles carry MIRV's. These ICBM's have multiple nuclear war heads that break up before they enter the atmosphere. And even if u take out 1 or 2, couple more would get through. That's why the US hasnt worked on that as much. Cuz the Russians would just jam more warheads into each missile.
gurey25 wrote:Mutually assured destruction is still in play and that means no war until some new technology changes things.
Unfortunatley it is around the corner, Graphene will enable Ultra capacitors that will make Railguns/Coil Guns feasible , along with increased processing power of computers and better radar more advanced AESA and distributed multi redundant datalinks.
All this means that you can survive a first attack by getting most missiles, and you can counter attack.
whoever wins the anti-missile race wins the war, and if those in power think they have a chance against russia even a little they will attack immediately.
We are about 20 years to that level of technology.
maybe another 20 too so 40 years.
nuclear war is inevitable.
if those fuckers think they have a tiny chance they will take it all the way.
It sort of makes the situation of Somalis even more bleak. We live in a world that is dying due to pollution and resources are becoming more scarce. Add to the equation growing populations, except in Somalia, and weapons being more destructive and powerful and we are royally fcked if we don't have a viable state and growing economy within the next 20 years.
^ Or if a mutual destruction arises Somalis can take advantage of the situation by progressing and mastering their environment, if a nuclear war does erupt it will be the ONLY nuclear war because mutual destruction will destroy any possibility of future nuclear weaponry production, aircraft-warfare might also might meet its end, and wars will return to naval fleets and military outposts.
