
Stay safe reer Snet America
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
You are fast becoming a parody. I sincerely hope you are just a really committed troll and don't actually believe the garbage you type. There is no sane or logical reason why anybody, much less an african, should believe the nonsense you spout.AbdiJohnson wrote:Smh @ the race card being used. Let's try and be mature for once. We are all adults here.
Decisions are made by looking at all the facts; they are not made because angry emotional racist hooligans who insist and threaten to have things go their way
We can't assume a black guy murders a white guy due to racial hate or prejudice and the same goes for Ferguson
I am,
Abdi "We must respect the outcome" Johnson
I am,"Eyewitness accounts must always be challenged and compared against the physical evidence. Many witnesses to the shooting of Michael Brown made statements inconsistent with other statements they gave, and inconsistent with the physical evidence," McCulloch added.
"The duty of the grand jury is to separate fact from fiction."
He cited, as an example, that a number of witnesses claimed they saw Wilson stand over Brown and shoot into his back. Some of those witnesses changed their story "once the autopsy findings were released showing Michael Brown had not sustained any wounds to the back of his body,"McCulloch said.
McCulloch said all three autopsies conducted on Brown were consistent, as was the scientific evidence, and the conclusion was that there was no probable cause to lay any charges against Wilson.
McCulloch mentioned that speculation in the media and in social media presented various versions of events, including that Brown had his hands in the air and was standing still when Wilson shot him. But, he said, numerous eyewitnesses whose testimony didn't change had never spoken to the media and their evidence has never been made public.
Not even involuntary manslaughter? Please. Prosecutors, as Judge Wachtler famously said, can indict a ham sandwich. McCullough just misstated the requirements of indictment. It does NOT require a thorough examination of all evidence. That's for a trial. Grand juries generally indict when prosecutors recommend that there is enough evidence. That didn't happen here. Imagine a cop is killed. Do you think prosecutors would tell the grand jury: it's up to you--no recommendation from us. Please....AbdiJohnson wrote:Smh @ the race card being used. Let's try and be mature for once. We are all adults here.
Decisions are made by looking at all the facts; they are not made because angry emotional racist hooligans who insist and threaten to have things go their way
We can't assume a black guy murders a white guy due to racial hate or prejudice and the same goes for Ferguson
I am,
Abdi "We must respect the outcome" Johnson