I rarely get the urge to punch someone in the face, but this is one of those times.....I kinda wish I hadn't just read the whole of that articleIn an interview for a BBC documentary, Singh also claimed that had Jyoti and her friend not tried to fight back, the gang would not have not have inflicted the savage beating, which led her to die from her injuries two weeks later.
Describing the killing as an "accident", he said: "When being raped, she shouldn't fight back. She should just be silent and allow the rape. Then they'd have dropped her off after 'doing her', and only hit the boy."
"You can't clap with one hand – it takes two hands," he says in the interview. "A decent girl won't roam around at 9 o'clock at night. A girl is far more responsible for rape than a boy. Boy and girl are not equal. Housework and housekeeping is for girls, not roaming in discos and bars at night doing wrong things, wearing wrong clothes. About 20 per cent of girls are good.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... rview.html
What's worse
just can't get my head around the kind of fucked up logic being displayed here, where setting anyone, let alone your own daughter, on fire isn't "losing face and character by doing such things" to a far more extreme degree than anything a girl could do to (excuse me while I puke) 'bring disgrace to her family' or whatever theirThe lawyers who defended the gang in court express similarly extreme views about women who venture out at night. In a previous televised interview, lawyer AP Singh said: "If my daughter or sister engaged in pre-marital activities and disgraced herself and allowed herself to lose face and character by doing such things, I would most certainly take this sort of sister or daughter to my farmhouse, and in front of my entire family, I would put petrol on her and set her alight."
........ but words fail me. I just can't express what I want to say.