The end of post WW2 strategic paradigm in middle east and fall of house of saud

Daily chitchat on Somali politics.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Typhoon
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2210
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Ubi concordia, ibi victoria - Publius Syrus

The end of post WW2 strategic paradigm in middle east and fall of house of saud

Post by Typhoon »

Image


In my analysis of geopolitical events and Geo-economic shifting paradigm, I would say; the Saudi akwaan state and its satellites is about to be dismantled (Peter Zeihan-The accidental superpower)

The Iranians are building Neo-Safavid Empire that follows some fermiliar strategic goals that fit well in the neoconcervitive american grand strategy (don`t be fooled by necons call for regime change in iran)

1) domination of key maritime choke points and sub-states (sub states I mean iran works within existing states but it deforms it and creates a state within state, classic Persian imperialism, shahishah, king of kings lord of mahdi army of Iraq, Lebanon’s hizbollah and now Yemen’s houthis)

2) Diplomatic negations with the west in order to legitimize Iranian power (nuclear negotiations are a bait to make the west accept Iranian hegemony over the arabs, iranians invented diplomacy during ancient Persian empire)

3) iran want guarantee of the west that iran is a western Eurasian power and the hegemon of the arabs in mesopotamia and Arabian peninsula( notice how iran doesn`t meddle in central asia)

4) iran will push remaining arabs and the arabs elites of the last 100 years in the hands of Israel in line with israel's post-peripheral strategy
I call iran israel war of words as the biggest political smokescreen in our time
-Trita Parsi, Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States
-A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama's Diplomacy with Iran
All warfare is based on deception
Sun Tzu
People need to remember the reason sadat made peace with Israel was because of his fear of soviet total domination of Egypt, and current arabs fear of iran would push them into the hands of Israel
Sadat did not decide to make peace with Israel because he suddenly converted to Zionism. His reason was quite different. He was aware that Egypt was becoming a Soviet colony. I saw that myself, on frequent visits to Egypt. The Soviet presence was palpable — more obtrusive than the British presence, and I’m old enough to remember that. The Soviets were taking over, there were places where no Arab was able to set foot
Bernard Lewis
5) arab will lose oil because all of the arabs oil is in shia lands an dthe us is betraying the gulf arabs for iran, the oil will flow to the world market with liberated shia arabs just like iraq ( the idelogy at the heart of the west has always been revolution hence iraq and the rise of shia)

6) the rise of horn of Africa as secure oil producer

7) arabs are resorting asymmetrical warfare in the face of persian imperialism and Israeli hegemony, the Arabs have forfeited a state strategy and their jihadist insurgency is to their own determent for it hastens their non state capabilities and it can easily be defeated in the lands of the Arabs (iraq war was a revolutionary war to remake 1000 year order, it was not about winning war in the conventional sense, it was a shock therapy)

8) the demonization an dehumanisation of the arabs for the past 15 years would legitimise the new project and will see the destruction of the arabs
There was big symbols in 9/11 hijackers being predominantly saudi...ding dong! ding dong"
Hadith 249. (Sahih Bukhari)
Narrated By Zainab bint Jahsh: That one day Allah's Apostle entered upon her in a state of fear and said, "None has the right to be worshipped but Allah! Woe to the Arabs from the Great evil that has approached (them). Today a hole has been opened in the dam of Gog and Magog like this." The Prophet made a circle with his index finger and thumb. Zainab bint Jahsh added: I said, "O Alllah's Apostle! Shall we be destroyed though there will be righteous people among us?" The Prophet said, "Yes, if the (number) of evil (persons) increased.
hard to believe? well its a slow proces and whole point is to resemble the effect of unexpected car accident
Image
User avatar
Typhoon
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2210
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Ubi concordia, ibi victoria - Publius Syrus

Re: The end of post WW2 strategic paradigm in middle east and fall of house of saud

Post by Typhoon »

I will make a thread about how Erdogans AKP party will lose power to the Turkish military and will end up in Syria starting Turkish civil war

hard to believe, well did you ever expect to see a black president,quantum computer and arab dictators falling like domino's.

We live in revolutionary volatile times, we live in the age of complexity and catastrophe
User avatar
Bandit
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2653
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:00 am

Re: The end of post WW2 strategic paradigm in middle east and fall of house of saud

Post by Bandit »

Typhoon wrote:Image


In my analysis of geopolitical events and Geo-economic shifting paradigm, I would say; the Saudi akwaan state and its satellites is about to be dismantled (Peter Zeihan-The accidental superpower)

The Iranians are building Neo-Safavid Empire that follows some fermiliar strategic goals that fit well in the neoconcervitive american grand strategy (don`t be fooled by necons call for regime change in iran)

1) domination of key maritime choke points and sub-states (sub states I mean iran works within existing states but it deforms it and creates a state within state, classic Persian imperialism, shahishah, king of kings lord of mahdi army of Iraq, Lebanon’s hizbollah and now Yemen’s houthis)

2) Diplomatic negations with the west in order to legitimize Iranian power (nuclear negotiations are a bait to make the west accept Iranian hegemony over the arabs, iranians invented diplomacy during ancient Persian empire)

3) iran want guarantee of the west that iran is a western Eurasian power and the hegemon of the arabs in mesopotamia and Arabian peninsula( notice how iran doesn`t meddle in central asia)

4) iran will push remaining arabs and the arabs elites of the last 100 years in the hands of Israel in line with israel's post-peripheral strategy
I call iran israel war of words as the biggest political smokescreen in our time
-Trita Parsi, Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States
-A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama's Diplomacy with Iran
All warfare is based on deception
Sun Tzu
People need to remember the reason sadat made peace with Israel was because of his fear of soviet total domination of Egypt, and current arabs fear of iran would push them into the hands of Israel
Sadat did not decide to make peace with Israel because he suddenly converted to Zionism. His reason was quite different. He was aware that Egypt was becoming a Soviet colony. I saw that myself, on frequent visits to Egypt. The Soviet presence was palpable — more obtrusive than the British presence, and I’m old enough to remember that. The Soviets were taking over, there were places where no Arab was able to set foot
Bernard Lewis
5) arab will lose oil because all of the arabs oil is in shia lands an dthe us is betraying the gulf arabs for iran, the oil will flow to the world market with liberated shia arabs just like iraq ( the idelogy at the heart of the west has always been revolution hence iraq and the rise of shia)

6) the rise of horn of Africa as secure oil producer

7) arabs are resorting asymmetrical warfare in the face of persian imperialism and Israeli hegemony, the Arabs have forfeited a state strategy and their jihadist insurgency is to their own determent for it hastens their non state capabilities and it can easily be defeated in the lands of the Arabs (iraq war was a revolutionary war to remake 1000 year order, it was not about winning war in the conventional sense, it was a shock therapy)

8) the demonization an dehumanisation of the arabs for the past 15 years would legitimise the new project and will see the destruction of the arabs
There was big symbols in 9/11 hijackers being predominantly saudi...ding dong! ding dong"
Hadith 249. (Sahih Bukhari)
Narrated By Zainab bint Jahsh: That one day Allah's Apostle entered upon her in a state of fear and said, "None has the right to be worshipped but Allah! Woe to the Arabs from the Great evil that has approached (them). Today a hole has been opened in the dam of Gog and Magog like this." The Prophet made a circle with his index finger and thumb. Zainab bint Jahsh added: I said, "O Alllah's Apostle! Shall we be destroyed though there will be righteous people among us?" The Prophet said, "Yes, if the (number) of evil (persons) increased.
hard to believe? well its a slow proces and whole point is to resemble the effect of unexpected car accident
Image
I like what am hearing op Image my dream come true :blessed:
User avatar
Typhoon
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2210
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Ubi concordia, ibi victoria - Publius Syrus

Re: The end of post WW2 strategic paradigm in middle east and fall of house of saud

Post by Typhoon »

guwop

why would want the destruction of the arabs titanic ma tahay
User avatar
sahal80
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 21185
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:49 pm

Re: The end of post WW2 strategic paradigm in middle east and fall of house of saud

Post by sahal80 »

My prediction is that sacudi will get more radicalized using the same card as iran and this will be good for the islamic movement and the political islam

Saudi is not an ikhan regime, its a wahabi pro-zionist regime

Wahabia has fought against the ottoman empire and in all the arabic schools even in syria they thought the kids how wahabia was the first arab nationalist movement!

Ikhwan is a pro-muslim solidarity regime who calls for the rivaval of the muslim world

Some of them like sudan r anti-westren who were influenced by iran, arab nationalists and the the communist movement, so they cooperate only with the east-russia, china- and asia

Others cooperate with the US and not all the west such as the EU and israel like turkey

So now saudi is calling for a "sunni front" that includes turkey and maybe the islamic movement in the future though this is against its interests too

Saudi and turkey are united against syria but have problems of wahabi pro-zionism vs ikhwan regarding the future governance of syria and other places

Actually this problem has reached somalia as the gulf countries were against turkey involvement in there and were putting some conditions infront of the somali govt regarding egypt and her relations with turkey

http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/turke ... n-75733962
Now this problems seems will not be there any more and the somali FM is on his way to saudi arabia coming from the UAE

This comes after the govt authorized for the saudi warplanes to use its airspace

The only change that the govt has made was having good relations with al sisi

As for the US-iran relations I believe its based on interests

The US govt has changed its approach towards iran since its invasions in iraq and afhganistan because of iran letting al sisani and her influence in iraq cooperating with the US against the sunni regime

Imam shafi has said if the kufars target any muslim nation they will get welcome from the rawafida within this nation-shia-!

So iran was indirectly cooperating with the US in its war against terrorism

So because of the war on terrorism-sunna- the US cannot target iran strategically

In his last days, bush has tried to negotiate with iran over its nuclear program but the then democratic candidate, obama has made contacts with iran asking them not to do so until he reaches the power bc he's better for them!

Iran has stopped its preparations for such talks with bush

Now obama wants to lift the economical sactions from iran in exchange of reducing its nuclear program

Saudi was behind removing maliki, was criticizing him and partraying him as sectarian and at some point was using the ISIS card to empower the sunna minority

Now the new pm is afraid of saudi arabia and being called sectarian so has good relations with saudi arabia, stays away from syria

He's preparing now to visit saudi arabia

Iran only got in iraq the allied shia paramilitaries but this pm is planning to hand over the sunni area to a local sunni police.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Politics - General Discussions”