SomaliNet Forums

Or are non-Mogadishu somalis just braindead. I just don't understand ? How can Mogadishu, which is the most dangerous city in Africa be much more developed than other somali cities who are enjoying peace and stability ? Usually in other parts of world the more stable the region is the more developed it is. With somali regions it's the opposite. How come ?

What is the point of being more developed than Hargeysa when you can't even curb the influx of foreign terrorists (from regions that have peace) at your doorsteps bombing every Hotel, restaurant, garden, etc that was built?

FarhanYare wrote: What is the point of being more developed than Hargeysa when you can't even curb the influx of foreign terrorists (from regions that have peace) at your doorsteps bombing every Hotel, restaurant, garden, etc that was built?

Don't mention hargeisa please

GIJaamac wrote:Or are non-Mogadishu somalis just braindead. I just don't understand ? How can Mogadishu, which is the most dangerous city in Africa be much more developed than other somali cities who are enjoying peace and stability ? Usually in other parts of world the more stable the region is the more developed it is. With somali regions it's the opposite. How come ?

come on, don't play games
Mogadishu is the most densely populated city in Somalia, its the capital city so enjoys higher levels of economic activity. it receives international funding on development projects funded by un, us , japan, eu, uae. whereas most other Somali regions are self made. trying to compare Mogadishu with galmudug or southwest state, puntland, jubbaland, somaliland is unfair. give these places an equal footing or independence and Mogadishu would stop receiving aid based on capital city status.
this is why African is a shithole we look at African standards, we shouldn't celebrate mediocrity, the world has changed unless a capital city looks like this:

addis skyline

Djibouti has a train line and mogadishu doesnt. So i guess djiboutians have higher I.Q

100 years of Italian development.
21 years of Siad socialism (no other town allowed)
6 years of Turks
80 years of international aid/donors funding

Locals did shyt all and in terms of capital it is the least capital looking place in Africa.

Well if war and anarchy brings you the best development in all Somalia, why bother looking for peace and stability?

I'm I correct HuTu?

FarhanYare wrote: What is the point of being more developed than Hargeysa when you can't even curb the influx of foreign terrorists (from regions that have peace) at your doorsteps bombing every Hotel, restaurant, garden, etc that was built?

Waryaa adiga dhaadhaanimada kama waynaatid miyaa ? Even the most advanced nations can't prevent suicide attacks, so how can you expect Somalia to do any better ? Dumb fu*k !

barca252 wrote:

GIJaamac wrote:Or are non-Mogadishu somalis just braindead. I just don't understand ? How can Mogadishu, which is the most dangerous city in Africa be much more developed than other somali cities who are enjoying peace and stability ? Usually in other parts of world the more stable the region is the more developed it is. With somali regions it's the opposite. How come ?

come on, don't play games
Mogadishu is the most densely populated city in Somalia, its the capital city so enjoys higher levels of economic activity. it receives international funding on development projects funded by un, us , japan, eu, uae. whereas most other Somali regions are self made. trying to compare Mogadishu with galmudug or southwest state, puntland, jubbaland, somaliland is unfair. give these places an equal footing or independence and Mogadishu would stop receiving aid based on capital city status.
this is why African is a shithole we look at African standards, we shouldn't celebrate mediocrity, the world has changed unless a capital city looks like this:

addis skyline

All somali regions are shithole ATM, but Xamar is less shithole than others. Yeah Mogadishu is the most densely populated somali city but also the most dangerous too. Pretty much all somali regions receive aid so i don't see how you can claim otherwise.

dvision01 wrote:Djibouti has a train line and mogadishu doesnt. So i guess djiboutians have higher I.Q

Average Djibouti city suburb. So much for your claim

Where the hell is that

AwRastaale wrote:100 years of Italian development.
21 years of Siad socialism (no other town allowed)
6 years of Turks
80 years of international aid/donors funding

Locals did shyt all and in terms of capital it is the least capital looking place in Africa.

Bullshit. Do you want to compare Mogadishu's private sector to Somaliland's ? I dare you xabashi bootyclapper.

skywalker25 wrote:Well if war and anarchy brings you the best development in all Somalia, why bother looking for peace and stability?

I'm I correct HuTu?

Xamar is surviving and developing in the midst of anarchy and will prosper once the peace arrives. Can't say same about your country loser.

What private?

You mean the Turks feeding the locals, running the airport, port?

Nigga the place looks like a ghetto compared to the real capitals in the region.

The only thing Mog has on Somali towns is the Italian town planning but when you compare to Asmara, which is also Italian legacy you know locals have low IQ coz unlike Asmara Hawiye bombed Mogadishu.