AI software can recognize Homosexuals

[Publicopinion]

AI facial recognition can infer if a man is gay or straight

https://news.cgtn.com/news/786b444f3355 ... are_p.html

[DaacasBiyo]

Don't buy these fake stories, AI is not meant to recognize some homo or LGBT people's face, no my friend, it's meant to be weaponized. All these trainings they are putting through the AI are meant to train it to one day put it into military robots, they write all these mundane articles to tell people it's about privacy or about some abstract human existential threat but they never say what it really is meant for which is to keep white supremacist world domination.

They're telling you their AI is "trained" to tell us who's gay between these two. I don't buy it. It's meant for something more sinister.


Jack Donovan, a gay white supremacist


Prince

[Xildiiid]

11% of the worlds population and despite their nukes they still want robots to fight for them.

All this self hate that you see among Africans and Asians is because of cadaan domination and privilege.

One day though.. waxaa lagu celin doonaa the caves they crawled out of.

AI is a future threat to Africa and Africans. Putin was talking at summit recently stating that however masters AI will eventually rule the world.

[DaacasBiyo]

Yeah, the Russians say it's about the military, the Chinese are honest too and say AI is about the economy but also about the military, it's only the US who say it's about the economy or some other bullshit to as usual distract and deceive people. Also this whole thing about giving AI a human face is fake, this thing will not have a human face when it will be in military mode, it will probably look like the killer robot in the movie Red Planet.

[Xildiiid]

Saw my previou post, f-king typo

Yh, AI is strictly for the military industry. I don't think they will succeed though but who knows.. As of now a human soldier is 100% more effective.

[Basra-]

AL homo detector is a farce. Aint nobody got time for that! U need a good Gay radar like I do! But then again, I have a radar of everything. Nothing gets passed my observation. I can point out u have cancer before u do! Heck I have correctly predicted the facial features or uniqueness of somalinet forumers without meeting them! lol

[Publicopinion]

AL homo detector is a farce. Aint nobody got time for that! U need a good Gay radar like I do! But then again, I have a radar of everything. Nothing gets passed my observation. I can point out u have cancer before u do! Heck I have correctly predicted the facial features or uniqueness of somalinet forumers without meeting them! lol

can you predict me my features?

[gurey25]

Dacas is scared of AI, he thinks whitey will sick some AI hounds on his black ass and lynch him.

I keep telling you the battlefield of the future if we last till 2050 will not be to whitey's advantage.
Whitey sure scares you doesn't he..

[DaacasBiyo]

Dacas is scared of AI, he thinks whitey will sick some AI hounds on his black ass and lynch him.

I keep telling you the battlefield of the future if we last till 2050 will not be to whitey's advantage.
Whitey sure scares you doesn't he..

I am being pragmatic and you being providential. The smartest people on this planet are very worried about AI, check out the views of Stephen Hawking, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, etc...You muzzies baffle me, you probably believe the sky God will protect you from AI and has prepared you a fancy after life in case shit hits the fan, that's why muzzies and evangelical nutjobs don't believe in Global warming either and worship oil.

This AI can already drive, it can dream, it can play very sophisticated games and beat humans, it can paint, it can even write poetry, etc...It's just a matter of time before they weaponize it.

As for the hounds, have you noticed that all the military robots are animals, they don't have human robots and that's why you are being confused, you expect the AI will look like the Terminator cyborg, on the contrary the military AI will look like animals and even if they decide to make it look like human for military purposes, it will probably look like the robot in I, Robot and not some ridiculous Terminator cyborg.

This is feasable


This is fantasy



These robots can be easily upgraded with a sophisticated AI, it's just that simple

[gurey25]

I am not panicking because AI is no where near even partial sentience much less sapience, and the technology to build a sophisticated quantum computer that can match the power of a lizard is several decades away.
Bill gates, hawkins and musk are scared because they believe in the singularity, when AI development starts accelerating beyond human capacity to keep up, as Sapient AI's develop themselves and evolve.
The thing is we need advances in quantum mechanics and better understanding of physics first, and at current rate of development we are looking at minimum of 50 years for sentience.

Forget about all that thats for your grandchildren to worry about, do you want to be more scared than now.
Today's technology is more than enough for what you see in the movie AI with will smith, except for the robots not having sentience.
They already have the ability to act remotely without programming, responding to orders,
and yes a human form android is not required or even efficient , the most efficient is an 8 leg spider form,
there are however 4 legged mule types already perfected.

Whats stopping depolyment right now is the vulnerability to electronic warfare and the primitive state of IFF( Identify friend or foe). Since the west tries to present itself as the good guy and is mindful of civilian deaths this poses a problem.

Full on Sci fi level sapient level AI is not even required , to be millitarily effective , minimal sentience like a hive mind is more than enough, and im sorry to say this we do not need to wait 50+ years for this,
its at least a couple of decades away.
sentience is the level where AI decides to kill humans, full on Sapience and singularity is not required.

The good news is that defensive technology are growing faster than offensive technologies,
do not be surprised if some alshabaab or taliban like guerilla forces in 2060 use black market electronic warfare tech to put down thousands of "peacekeeping robots" in one shot.

You think slagging muzzies makes you sound smart, well it only does to others like you, to a muslim you will always be at best seen as handicapped.
but i digress back to the topic.

This is a subject ive been studying since i discovered asimov as a 10 year old,
science fiction has been my lifelong love, along with history, and over the years ive aquired some knowledge of millitary affairs from history.

and lastly millitary science fiction is my hobby i am not yet published but i have written allot about it,
mostly focusing on hard science fiction based on known science, and mostly focusing on the near future i.e 2017-2090 .

[Basra-]

I am glad that robotic future is not in my future, or members of this forum future. LOL WE will all be dead! LOL I am not ready for a revolution like smart phones on Human functions! LOL

[DaacasBiyo]

I am not panicking because AI is no where near even partial sentience much less sapience, and the technology to build a sophisticated quantum computer that can match the power of a lizard is several decades away.
Bill gates, hawkins and musk are scared because they believe in the singularity, when AI development starts accelerating beyond human capacity to keep up, as Sapient AI's develop themselves and evolve.
The thing is we need advances in quantum mechanics and better understanding of physics first, and at current rate of development we are looking at minimum of 50 years for sentience.

Forget about all that thats for your grandchildren to worry about, do you want to be more scared than now.
Today's technology is more than enough for what you see in the movie AI with will smith, except for the robots not having sentience.
They already have the ability to act remotely without programming, responding to orders,
and yes a human form android is not required or even efficient , the most efficient is an 8 leg spider form,
there are however 4 legged mule types already perfected.

Whats stopping depolyment right now is the vulnerability to electronic warfare and the primitive state of IFF( Identify friend or foe). Since the west tries to present itself as the good guy and is mindful of civilian deaths this poses a problem.

Full on Sci fi level sapient level AI is not even required , to be millitarily effective , minimal sentience like a hive mind is more than enough, and im sorry to say this we do not need to wait 50+ years for this,
its at least a couple of decades away.
sentience is the level where AI decides to kill humans, full on Sapience and singularity is not required.

The good news is that defensive technology are growing faster than offensive technologies,
do not be surprised if some alshabaab or taliban like guerilla forces in 2060 use black market electronic warfare tech to put down thousands of "peacekeeping robots" in one shot.

You think slagging muzzies makes you sound smart, well it only does to others like you, to a muslim you will always be at best seen as handicapped.
but i digress back to the topic.

This is a subject ive been studying since i discovered asimov as a 10 year old,
science fiction has been my lifelong love, along with history, and over the years ive aquired some knowledge of millitary affairs from history.

and lastly millitary science fiction is my hobby i am not yet published but i have written allot about it,
mostly focusing on hard science fiction based on known science, and mostly focusing on the near future i.e 2017-2090 .

Well that's the problem, you are a nerd who believes in fantasy worlds and believes in an after life fantasy world too. I live in this world and it's reality to me and I am worried for its existance, and don't get caught up with the word muzzie I did not get offended when you implied I would get lynched so don't get offended easily.

Like we debated in some other thread about this topic, even though I agree with Elon Musk and others as to AI being dangerous, I still don't trust their opinion as to AI being dangerous when it reaches singularity, this is the abstract human existential threat they scare people with.

I believe they can easily upgrade those little robots in the video with autonomous AI and load them with deadly viruses programmed to be released at certain time in certain places undetected and these little robots don't need to be sentient to be deadly.

As for the vulnerability to electronic warfare stopping deployment of these little things and quantum tech not advanced yet, again I totally disagree with you, the Chinese lunched a quantum satellite and the US is working hard to do the same, these military advances are happening fast and I don't know how you can easily dismiss them when you claim you have knowledge of military affairs.

The problem is you are still thinking like the white boys, you have to let go of that thinking, these things don't need to be sentient to be dangerous let alone reach singularity, a gun does not need to be smart to kill. The whole objective of AI is to be autonomous these other human like features of touch and feelings they want to add are extra and it does not need them to be dangerous.

As for defensive tech against AI, I think conventional weapons would still destroy them, I don't think they are making these things robust, they just want to make them smart and stealthy so we should not worry about defensive weapons right now, I think we should only be worrying about this offensive AI and how we Africans can get into this game.

I already posted here about the story of one African brotha who created a first kind neuron-based AI and your muzzie brotha paperino ridiculed it, so you know where the handicap lays, but I digress.

I think we should not believe those who say AI is not being dangerous yet, this thing is dangerous as is and even Elon Must today repeated that after Putin said the country that controls AI will rule the world, so this clearly indicates that the Whites see this AI thing as a weapon and will compete to control it and if we know something about evolution(I know you muzzies don't believe it), things start small and then become big so we should not expect AI to be put in a big human-like Android, no, it will be in a small robot first and they will evolve it gradually and we should watch for that.

[gurey25]

are making these things robust, they just want to make them smart and stealthy so we should not worry about defensive weapons right now, I think we should only be worrying about this offensive AI and how we Africans can get into this game.
[/quote]

we are still talking past each other, agree on most points but you lack my enthusiasm for defensive technologies.
I may have just passed A-level physics that is british curriculum for you north amrericans, which is equivalant
to year 1 physics in most north american universities, only the Ivy leauge schools like MIT are upto the world standard, most US universities are far below world standard. Indian, Chinese , french , German and Russian highschool physics are much more advanced.
yes i read current scientific journals because i like to keep abreast of changes, and it helps my hobby which is millitary science fiction.
so i advise you to do the same if you have any doubts.

in this cycle defensive technologies are moving faster than offensive ones, they will be cheaper and easier to use than offensive AI.
If you read what i wrote earlier i said that we are already at the technological level of your worst nightmare, only political and economic considerations prevent widescale use, but this is only for a short time.

To you this might seem scary and fast, but its been excruciatingly long for my community of nerds,
infact i am one of the most conservative ones you will find.

every scary thing you read and discover is at least 20-30 years too late for some people,
to us technology is moving far slower than its potential.

while waiting we have already wargamed most of whats discussed , several times to pass the time and wait for technology to catchup to its potential.

[DaacasBiyo]

we are still talking past each other, agree on most points but you lack my enthusiasm for defensive technologies.
I may have just passed A-level physics that is british curriculum for you north amrericans, which is equivalant
to year 1 physics in most north american universities, only the Ivy leauge schools like MIT are upto the world standard, most US universities are far below world standard. Indian, Chinese , french , German and Russian highschool physics are much more advanced.
yes i read current scientific journals because i like to keep abreast of changes, and it helps my hobby which is millitary science fiction.
so i advise you to do the same if you have any doubts.

in this cycle defensive technologies are moving faster than offensive ones, they will be cheaper and easier to use than offensive AI.
If you read what i wrote earlier i said that we are already at the technological level of your worst nightmare, only political and economic considerations prevent widescale use, but this is only for a short time.

To you this might seem scary and fast, but its been excruciatingly long for my community of nerds,
infact i am one of the most conservative ones you will find.

every scary thing you read and discover is at least 20-30 years too late for some people,
to us technology is moving far slower than its potential.

while waiting we have already wargamed most of whats discussed , several times to pass the time and wait for technology to catchup to its potential.

I think you are being easily dismissive and I don't fault you for that because you don't study White supremacy which I would suggest you do now since the leader of the world is an open White supremacist.
Remember when they were developing the nuclear weapons in the 40s, what if we have said: oh, well, this thing is not going to be dangerous since they can't put it in an ICBM.
Brotha, I think you are being very optimistic and naive but I say that with respect because I know deep down you don't trust them but you admire them, however, your judgement is being obscured so let's just agree to disagree.

[gurey25]

I think you are being easily dismissive and I don't fault you for that because you don't study White supremacy which I would suggest you do now since the leader of the world is an open White supremacist.
Remember when they were developing the nuclear weapons in the 40s, what if we have said: oh, well, this thing is not going to be dangerous since they can't put it in an ICBM.
Brotha, I think you are being very optimistic and naive but I say that with respect because I know deep down you don't trust them but you admire them, however, your judgement is being obscured so let's just agree to disagree.

you dont understand i used to admire them now i am dumbstruck by the level of utter stupidity they are showing.
they willingly gave up a 20 year lead in technology after 1990 by deciding to spend their money on playing the global casino and making profits how ever imaginary.
China and Russia have caught up in most fields of millitary technology and are leading in some of the most important areas like hypersonic sub orbital aircraft and air defence as well as electronic warfare.
The US gambled on stealth but its already been compromised most Ruusian and Chinese airdefense systems can detect and track stealth aircraft but face difficulty targeting and intercepting them.
All thats required is progress in processing technology and this will happen naturally in the commercial industry within 5 years. or it may have already happen, we rely on declassified industry material and its usually between 5 to 10 years from declassification and appearance in a science journal.


on top of that they willingly destroyed their own industry due to profits ,
meaning that in any conventional war they would drop very fan in levels of technology.
for example the US cannot manufacture essential avionics and even cruise missiles without components from 2 japanese companies.

infact if spetsnaz or terrorists raid and destroy 3 one of 3 compounds in texas US advanced industry would come to a standstill for several months.

it gets worse,
those morons decided that their nuclear weapons were advanced enough when the Russian and chinese with their latest versions of satan and dong feng missiles have reached a full generation ahead of the US in technology.

another area is air defense, and anti ballistic missile defense, where the US has never even been able to reach equilibrium since the 70's.

in a full scale nuclear war less than 1/5 of US missiles will ever hit Russia, and less than 1/4 of Russian missiles will be intercepted by the US.

the problem is that its more than enough to destroy both.