Medieval England twice as well off as today’s poorest nations

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
User avatar
Samsee
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 5:03 pm

Medieval England twice as well off as today’s poorest nations

Post by Samsee »

very interesting

https://warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/pre ... and_twice/
New research led by economists at the University of Warwick reveals that medieval England was not only far more prosperous than previously believed, it also actually boasted an average income that would be more than double the average per capita income of the world’s poorest nations today.

In a paper entitled British Economic Growth 1270-1870 published by the University of Warwick’s Centre on Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) the researchers find that living standards in medieval England were far above the “bare bones subsistence” experience of people in many of today’s poor countries.

The figure of $400 annually (as expressed in 1990 international dollars) is commonly is used as a measure of “bare bones subsistence” and was previously believed to be the average income in England in the middle ages.

However the University of Warwick led researchers found that English per capita incomes in the late Middle Ages were actually of the order of $1,000 (again as expressed in 1990 dollars). Even on the eve of the Black Death, which first struck in 1348/49, the researchers found per capita incomes in England of more than $800 using the same 1990 dollar measure. Their estimates for other European countries also suggest late medieval living standards well above $400.

This new figure of $1,000 is not only significantly higher than previous estimates for that period in England – it also indicates that on average medieval England was better off than some of the world’s poorest nations today including the following (again average annual income as expressed in 1990 dollars).

Zaire $249
Burundi $479
Niger $514
Central African Republic $536
Comoro Islands $549
Togo $606
Guinea Bissau $617
Guinea $628
Sierra Leone $686
Haiti $686
Chad $706
Zimbabwe $779
Afghanistan $869
University of Warwick economist Professor Stephen Broadberry, who led the research said:

“Our work sheds new light on England’s economic past, revealing that per capita incomes in medieval England were substantially higher than the “bare bones subsistence” levels experienced by people living in poor countries in our modern world. The majority of the British population in medieval times could afford to consume what we call a “respectability basket” of consumer goods that allowed for occasional luxuries. By the late Middle Ages, the English people were in a position to afford a varied diet including meat, dairy produce and ale, as well as the less highly processed grain products that comprised the bulk of the “bare bones subsistence” diet."

He also said:

“Of course this paper focuses only on average per capita incomes. We also need to have a better understanding of the distribution of income in medieval England, as there will have been some people living at bare bones subsistence, and at times this proportion could have been quite substantial. We are now beginning research to construct social tables which will also reveal the distribution of income for some key benchmark years in that period”

"The research provides the first annual estimates of GDP for England between 1270 and 1700 and for Great Britain between 1700 and 1870. Far more data are available for the pre-1870 period than is widely realised. Britain after the Norman conquest was a literate and numerate society that generated substantial written records, many of which have survived. As a result, the research was aided by a wide variety of records – among them manorial records, tithes, farming records, and probate records."

Professor Broadberry further said that:

“Our research shows that the path to the Industrial Revolution began far earlier than commonly has been understood. A widely held view of economic history suggests that the Industrial Revolution of 1800 suddenly took off, in the wake of centuries without sustained economic growth or appreciable improvements in living standards in England from the days of the hunter-gatherer. By contrast, we find that the Industrial Revolution did not come out of the blue. Rather, it was the culmination of a long period of economic development stretching back as far as the late medieval period.”
the white man :clap: :clap:
User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: Medieval England twice as well off as today’s poorest nations

Post by X.Playa »

Total rubbish.
original dervish
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 29468
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:08 pm

Re: Medieval England twice as well off as today’s poorest nations

Post by original dervish »

Yeah.....we are expected to take the word of a drink sodden, idol worshiping iidoor over the researchers at Warwick University. :shaq:
User avatar
Basra-
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 49034
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:00 pm
Location: Somewhere far, far, far away from you forumers.

Re: Medieval England twice as well off as today’s poorest nations

Post by Basra- »

:stylin: Nice. That's why i will always LOVE England and its history. They fascinate me. While Somalis were chewing grass like the camels, Britons were writing flowing beautiful letters to each other. So much history restore in letter writing skills. I love. Give me an 18th century letter and u have given me an orgasm! :dj:
TeeriReturns
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:50 am

Re: Medieval England twice as well off as today’s poorest nations

Post by TeeriReturns »

Samsee wrote: Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:32 pm very interesting

https://warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/pre ... and_twice/
New research led by economists at the University of Warwick reveals that medieval England was not only far more prosperous than previously believed, it also actually boasted an average income that would be more than double the average per capita income of the world’s poorest nations today.

In a paper entitled British Economic Growth 1270-1870 published by the University of Warwick’s Centre on Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) the researchers find that living standards in medieval England were far above the “bare bones subsistence” experience of people in many of today’s poor countries.

The figure of $400 annually (as expressed in 1990 international dollars) is commonly is used as a measure of “bare bones subsistence” and was previously believed to be the average income in England in the middle ages.

However the University of Warwick led researchers found that English per capita incomes in the late Middle Ages were actually of the order of $1,000 (again as expressed in 1990 dollars). Even on the eve of the Black Death, which first struck in 1348/49, the researchers found per capita incomes in England of more than $800 using the same 1990 dollar measure. Their estimates for other European countries also suggest late medieval living standards well above $400.

This new figure of $1,000 is not only significantly higher than previous estimates for that period in England – it also indicates that on average medieval England was better off than some of the world’s poorest nations today including the following (again average annual income as expressed in 1990 dollars).

Zaire $249
Burundi $479
Niger $514
Central African Republic $536
Comoro Islands $549
Togo $606
Guinea Bissau $617
Guinea $628
Sierra Leone $686
Haiti $686
Chad $706
Zimbabwe $779
Afghanistan $869
University of Warwick economist Professor Stephen Broadberry, who led the research said:

“Our work sheds new light on England’s economic past, revealing that per capita incomes in medieval England were substantially higher than the “bare bones subsistence” levels experienced by people living in poor countries in our modern world. The majority of the British population in medieval times could afford to consume what we call a “respectability basket” of consumer goods that allowed for occasional luxuries. By the late Middle Ages, the English people were in a position to afford a varied diet including meat, dairy produce and ale, as well as the less highly processed grain products that comprised the bulk of the “bare bones subsistence” diet."

He also said:

“Of course this paper focuses only on average per capita incomes. We also need to have a better understanding of the distribution of income in medieval England, as there will have been some people living at bare bones subsistence, and at times this proportion could have been quite substantial. We are now beginning research to construct social tables which will also reveal the distribution of income for some key benchmark years in that period”

"The research provides the first annual estimates of GDP for England between 1270 and 1700 and for Great Britain between 1700 and 1870. Far more data are available for the pre-1870 period than is widely realised. Britain after the Norman conquest was a literate and numerate society that generated substantial written records, many of which have survived. As a result, the research was aided by a wide variety of records – among them manorial records, tithes, farming records, and probate records."

Professor Broadberry further said that:

“Our research shows that the path to the Industrial Revolution began far earlier than commonly has been understood. A widely held view of economic history suggests that the Industrial Revolution of 1800 suddenly took off, in the wake of centuries without sustained economic growth or appreciable improvements in living standards in England from the days of the hunter-gatherer. By contrast, we find that the Industrial Revolution did not come out of the blue. Rather, it was the culmination of a long period of economic development stretching back as far as the late medieval period.”
the white man :clap: :clap:

nothing nw here, africans have low iq, their leaders have destroyed them, did you know africans were poorer in the 1980s than they were in the 1960s?

south korea was richer than hana in the 1960s, today south koread has same as 50% of the gdp of whole africa, 50 million south korea, africa 1.2 billlion,

3% of africans go ot uni, 70% of south kreans,

in 1000 AD, bagdad had street lamps, london was a marsh land, things filiped, arabs and muslims who invineted the worlds first uni hundrssd of years vbefore oxford uni are now poooerre,

amercia has 5,000 unis, EU has 3,300 unis, whole muslim world of 57 nations 1.8 billion people have 50 universties,

muslims invented eye and other surgery and medical devices sued to this day, we were great borefore, how far we have falledn in terms of knweldge,
TeeriReturns
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:50 am

Re: Medieval England twice as well off as today’s poorest nations

Post by TeeriReturns »

Samsee wrote: Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:32 pm very interesting

https://warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/pre ... and_twice/
New research led by economists at the University of Warwick reveals that medieval England was not only far more prosperous than previously believed, it also actually boasted an average income that would be more than double the average per capita income of the world’s poorest nations today.

In a paper entitled British Economic Growth 1270-1870 published by the University of Warwick’s Centre on Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) the researchers find that living standards in medieval England were far above the “bare bones subsistence” experience of people in many of today’s poor countries.

The figure of $400 annually (as expressed in 1990 international dollars) is commonly is used as a measure of “bare bones subsistence” and was previously believed to be the average income in England in the middle ages.

However the University of Warwick led researchers found that English per capita incomes in the late Middle Ages were actually of the order of $1,000 (again as expressed in 1990 dollars). Even on the eve of the Black Death, which first struck in 1348/49, the researchers found per capita incomes in England of more than $800 using the same 1990 dollar measure. Their estimates for other European countries also suggest late medieval living standards well above $400.

This new figure of $1,000 is not only significantly higher than previous estimates for that period in England – it also indicates that on average medieval England was better off than some of the world’s poorest nations today including the following (again average annual income as expressed in 1990 dollars).

Zaire $249
Burundi $479
Niger $514
Central African Republic $536
Comoro Islands $549
Togo $606
Guinea Bissau $617
Guinea $628
Sierra Leone $686
Haiti $686
Chad $706
Zimbabwe $779
Afghanistan $869
University of Warwick economist Professor Stephen Broadberry, who led the research said:

“Our work sheds new light on England’s economic past, revealing that per capita incomes in medieval England were substantially higher than the “bare bones subsistence” levels experienced by people living in poor countries in our modern world. The majority of the British population in medieval times could afford to consume what we call a “respectability basket” of consumer goods that allowed for occasional luxuries. By the late Middle Ages, the English people were in a position to afford a varied diet including meat, dairy produce and ale, as well as the less highly processed grain products that comprised the bulk of the “bare bones subsistence” diet."

He also said:

“Of course this paper focuses only on average per capita incomes. We also need to have a better understanding of the distribution of income in medieval England, as there will have been some people living at bare bones subsistence, and at times this proportion could have been quite substantial. We are now beginning research to construct social tables which will also reveal the distribution of income for some key benchmark years in that period”

"The research provides the first annual estimates of GDP for England between 1270 and 1700 and for Great Britain between 1700 and 1870. Far more data are available for the pre-1870 period than is widely realised. Britain after the Norman conquest was a literate and numerate society that generated substantial written records, many of which have survived. As a result, the research was aided by a wide variety of records – among them manorial records, tithes, farming records, and probate records."

Professor Broadberry further said that:

“Our research shows that the path to the Industrial Revolution began far earlier than commonly has been understood. A widely held view of economic history suggests that the Industrial Revolution of 1800 suddenly took off, in the wake of centuries without sustained economic growth or appreciable improvements in living standards in England from the days of the hunter-gatherer. By contrast, we find that the Industrial Revolution did not come out of the blue. Rather, it was the culmination of a long period of economic development stretching back as far as the late medieval period.”
the white man :clap: :clap:

nothing nw here, africans have low iq, their leaders have destroyed them, did you know africans were poorer in the 1980s than they were in the 1960s?

south korea was richer than hana in the 1960s, today south koread has same as 50% of the gdp of whole africa, 50 million south korea, africa 1.2 billlion,

3% of africans go ot uni, 70% of south kreans,

in 1000 AD, bagdad had street lamps, london was a marsh land, things filiped, arabs and muslims who invineted the worlds first uni hundrssd of years vbefore oxford uni are now poooerre,

amercia has 5,000 unis, EU has 3,300 unis, whole muslim world of 57 nations 1.8 billion people have 50 universties,

muslims invented eye and other surgery and medical devices sued to this day, we were great borefore, how far we have falledn in terms of knweldge,


jews 14 million, arabs 450 million, muslims, 1.8 billion, jews win on average 29% of all nobles for medicine, economics, sciences etc.
User avatar
Khalid Ali
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 32728
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:03 am
Location: Suldaan Emperior Gacanyarihisa

Re: Medieval England twice as well off as today’s poorest nations

Post by Khalid Ali »

Numbers don't say anything its about intellectuality high iq The drive to learn. Work ethic history civilization. That why the British empire ruled the world the British empire the sun never sets from east to west.

That's why the Persians are much further then Arabs intellectuality critical thinking forward thinking.

It's about economics finance industries it's the money that makes the world go around. The brits were pretty good in the 18 century. With the decline of the ottoman empire the sick man of Europe. The industrial revolution gave them a good head start. The brits made money with every one Iranians the Iranian shah regime. With the Saudis the start up. The brits were pretty smart motherfuckers
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”