I literally do not see a "why" in "here is why?"
I think you presume to have answered the question in this paragraph:
it looks like Turkey, Qatar and Fahad Yaasiin and HSM are preparing the Crown For Guuled to be the President of 2021 as he is the only Candidate that has Good Relations with BOTH N&N Farmaajo/Fahad Yaasin and the Oppositions.
But when you state "It looks like" ----I can't see it.
And when you say "as he is the only"----I can't see that either.
And when you say "good relations with both N&N.. "----Nor can I see this time either.
Here is why is supposed to lead to an explanation. You haven't explained, you made a statement.
It is basically like this
"Apples and Oranges are preparing for Grapefruit to take the fruit stand as Grapefruit as Grapefruit is the only one to have good relations with both Apples and Oranges. "
1. Grapefruit might have good relations with Oranges (as they are both Citrus) but there is 0% evidence presented to say Grapefruit has good relations with Apples.
2. AND there is 0% evidence to suggest any relationship/agreement betwern Oranges and Apples even if Grapefruit had good relations with the both of them.
3. Which comes back full circle to say 0% evidence has been presented about the next Fruit Stand.