Page 1 of 2
New evidence showing somali slaves 1886....Shocking
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:55 am
by sUpA__NigggA
ow my dayz

, i swear down i never used to beleive that maali people werent slaves untill i saw this picture
http://s92.photobucket.com/albums/l21/p ... zumali.jpgserious them daroods people Waste way dhaafeen.. waste and half
Re: New evidence showing somali slaves 1886....Shocking
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:13 am
by hiphop50girl
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:17 am
by Khalid 5
STILL DAROOD SLAVES AKA JEWS
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:28 am
by SLIM-THUG
SLAVES........................DAS COLD....
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:20 pm
by SNM chick
KHALID U ARE SOOOOOOOOO NARROW MINDED
SOMALI'Z ARE SOMALI'Z AT DA END OF DA DAY WHITHER THEY ARE DAROOD OR ISAAQ
DO U THINK THE WHITE SLAVE HOLDERZ CARED ABOUT THE TRIBE OF THE PEEPS THAY SLAVED?
NO THEY DID'NT A BLACK SLAVE IS A BLACK SLAVE WHETHER THEY ARE ISAAQ, DARROD, NIGERIAN WE ARE ALL DA SAME IN DA EYES OF RACIST SLAVE HOLDER
USE YA HEADZ PEEPS
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:51 pm
by Khalid 5
only darood being slaves isaaq where slave traders like my grandpa
mr seyid al xusseny
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:48 pm
by SNM chick
U CHAT SH!T 4 HOLLAND WARYA
ABOU ISAAQS WERE SLAVE HOLDERZ
AN U SAY IT AS IF YA PROUD
DER IS MORE PRIDE IN BEIN A SLAVE THAN BEIN AN EVIL SLAVE SELLER
N DO U REALLY THINK DA WHITE PEEPS WHO SOLD SLAVES REALLY THOUGHT DER WAS A DIFFERENCE IN VALUE BETWEEN ISAAQS AND DAROOD?
OBVIOUSLY NOT CUZ ALL BLACK PEOPLE WERE DA SAME IN DA EYEZ OF DA WHITE SLAVE OPPRESSERZ,
ALL BLACKZ WERE INFERIOR ACCORDING TO DA WHITEZ WHETEHER THEY WERE NIGERIAN, SOMALI OR ETHIOPIAN
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:55 pm
by Khalid 5
NOO NOT REALY HONEY BECOUS ETHIOPIA WAS NEVER COLONIZED BY THE WHITE MAN AND SOMALILAND WAS PROTECTORED EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TREETY WITH THEM THE DARAWISH TRY 2 FIGHT THEM OFF DIDDENT REALY WORK BUT STILL THERE IS A DIFFRENCE SOMALIS
ARE WAY HIGHER THEY SEE THEM SELF WAY HIGHER THE NINKA CAD
LEMME TELL UU SOMETHING
WHEN THE ENGLISH MEN WENT 2 A RESTAURANT YEAH HE EAT HE FINISHT THEN LATER ON THIS CIIDANGLLE GUY CAME 2 THE SAME RESTAURANT AND HE ASK FOR HILIB AND BARRIES THIS GYAL WHO WORKS THERE SHE SERF HIS FOOD ON THE WHITE MENS PLATE AND SHE DIDENT WASH IT AND HE WAS LIKE AWOOWGA LA GUUB MA ANGIA BAAD BLAYDKA GAALKU KU CUNNAY EE NIJAASKA EEH KAADIIDA ISKA MAYDHIN ISKU BLAYHD DOONAYS AILAD WAS NUGO RIIDEYD MEANING DO YOU WANT ME 2 EAT ON THE SAME PLATE THE THIS FLILTHY KAFIIR EAT ON U WANT ME 2 USE IT AGAIN
REAL HAPPEND STORY THE ENGLISH GUY REPLEYD AND SAID OTHER AFRICANS WOULD BE GLAD TO EAT FROM MY PLATE NOW THATS THE DIFFRENCE BETWEEN SOMALIS AND OTHER AFRICANS
AND I DONT KNOW IF DAROOD WHERE SLAVES THERE DECENTED OF ABRAHA MA HABAAR KA BADDAN BAA JIIRA
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:18 pm
by SNM chick
WARYAA KHALID SOMALILAND DIDNT EVEN EXIST IN DA 1980'Z NEVER MIND DA 1800'Z SO STOP YA SELF DER
SO WAT U ON ABOU?
SOMALI'Z ARE SOMALI'Z AT DA END OF DA DAY WHETHER THEY are isaaq, darood, hawiye etc
AND SLAVERY HAD NO TRIBAL LINE IT WAS ABOU DA COLOUR OF YA SKIN NOT DA TRIBE OF DA PERSON
AN IF U ARE DAFT ENOUGH TO BELEIVE YA FAIRY TALEZ ABOUT ONLY DAROODZ BEIN ENSLAVED THEN U ARE JUS NARROW MINDED
CUZ IF SOMALI'Z WERE ENSLAVED U BETTER BELIEVE PEOPLE FROM ALL DIFFERENT TRIBEZ INCLUDIN ISAAQ WERE ENSLAVED TOO
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:24 pm
by Khalid 5
bye who enslaved somalis where never enslaved what uu chating about they where slave traders stupidh
listen to this somaliland dident excist in 1980 but it did before 1960 duuh under british rule
the white man did know jus like he divided the hutus and the tutsis and he was so sick the met up there noses uu get me
but what uu dont understand if darood was enslaved there ppl never sold them malla wa xabaad xabaad ma fahantay waxa la adoonsaday and i stick what my grandpa told me he had slaves he used to bought them from kenya
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:32 pm
by LaYdEe_LuXiOuX
Waryaa Khaniis.5 Your Head Would Get Blown Up Like a Missile For Them Kinda Talkz You HoeLand Wa.nker.....Where Does Itstate That They Are Darood You C.ockFace...
Whereas
http://golkhatumo.com/And To The TopiC Maker You Waste Corpse......Enough Curse Your From A Dj's-booty You Incompetent Retard

Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:34 pm
by SNM chick
LOL SOMALILAND TODAY AN BRITISH SOMALILAND THEN IS COMPLETELEY DIFFRERNT
DER WAS ITALIAN SOMALILAND TOO N DAT TOO WAS DIFFTERNT CUZ THEY WERE COLONISED COUNTRY'Z DEN
U ARE A BIT SLOW
AND EXTREMELY NARROW MINDED, AND IGNORANT
IT ALMOST SEEMS LIKED YA CONVINCED WID WAT YA SAYIN
AN ITS SEEMS AS IF U ARE FOR SLAVERY AND NOT AGAINST IT
IF U REALLY BELIEV DAT ONLY DAROODS WERE ENSLAVED U ARE DUMMER THAN U LOOK,
CUZ AS I SAID SLAVERY HAD NO TRIBAL LINE BUT ONLY A COLOUR LINE, U ONLY HAD TO MEET ONE SIMPLE CRITERIA TO BE A SLAVE AND
DAT WAS TO BE BLACK
BUN DIS I REST MY CASE
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:35 pm
by Khalid 5
IT STILL EXCITED BEFORE THE BRITISH CAME IT WAS RULED BY CIIDANGALLE SULTANETE STILL WE USED TO HAVE OUR COUNTRY BEFORE THE BRITISH CAME SOO THERE FOR THAT WAS 17 CENTRY AND BEFORE THAT WE HAD THE ADAL EMPIRE OF AXMED GURRAY
BEAT THAT
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:43 pm
by LaYdEe_LuXiOuX
Khalid What Country Are You On About....As Far As Im Concerned Your So-Called Qabiil Was Part Of Somalia In The 17 Century..And Kiddo We Are In 2006 And You Still Are Part Of Somalia HenCe You Are Not RecognizedAs ACountry By the UN And The AU.......Thats One Of The Main Reasons I Hate Arguing WitChu...Its Because You Are Delusional And Your English Is Beyond Weak....Furthermore...You Dont Make Any sense Whatsoever.....So Im Outz....I refuse To argue With a Retard

Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:44 pm
by SNM chick
BEAT WHAT?
LISTEN I AM NOT EVEN GOIN TO CONTINUE TO HAVE THIS DISPUTE WID U AS U ARE FAR TO IGNORANT AND NARROW MINDED,
IF WANT WANT TO INSIST ON CHATTIN SH!T THEM BE MY GUEST BUT I REFUSE TO BE A PART OF IT
SO PEACE OUT
MR PURE TRIBIST