Brother Humiliates the Queen and Poodle Blair

[michael_ital]

All in a bid to avoid reperations, though no one had problems handing money to stinking filthy jews.

===============================================

'This is a disgrace'

AP PHOTO/STEPHEN HIRD
Protester Toyin Agbetu disrupts a service at London's Westminster Abbey to mark the bicentenary of the 1807 act to abolish the slave trade. Queen Elizabeth is at the top right. Email story
Print
Choose text size
Report typo or correction
Email the author Tag and save

Mar 28, 2007 04:30 AM
Royson James



LONDON–Steps from the Queen, spitting distance from Prime Minister Tony Blair, and with his voice ricocheting off the hundreds of statues and monuments in one of Christendom's most famous edifices, a lone protester yesterday halted Britain's national service marking 200 years since the end of the slave trade.

As the commemorative service entered its most solemn portion in Westminster Abbey – coronation court to monarchs and burial ground to 3,300 of Britain's finest citizens – the protester struck, bringing the event to a halt.

Security and church officials hesitated, afraid to escalate a public relations disaster.

Which white man wanted to be photographed hauling a black man out of church in handcuffs on the day the nation came to seek forgiveness for a practice the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, had just called "this atrocity" and "universal sinfulness"?

So, Toyin Agbetu had a royal audience – and he gave them a piece of his mind.

"This is a disgrace to our ancestors," he shouted, jabbing his finger at the Queen, sitting beside Prince Philip. "Millions of our ancestors are in the Atlantic," he said, a reference to the massive losses at sea aboard slave ships.

"`Sorry' is so hard for you, sir," he screamed at Blair.

Everyone present knew Blair had refused to pronounce an official apology for Britain's central role in the trade that enslaved as many as 20 million Africans in the colonies' cotton, tobacco and sugar plantations.

"This is an insult. We should not be here. All you Christians who are Africans should walk out of here," the man said before being eased out beneath the soaring 31-metre-high arches.

He was greeted outside the abbey by a small group of protesters, chanting: "1807 to 2007, nothing's changed." Then he was arrested.

Some 2,000 eminent Londoners – royals, diplomats, politicians, church leaders, and descendants of African slaves and British slavers – had poured into Westminster Abbey yesterday, seeking forgiveness and healing from the horrors of the slave trade.

Most passed through the Great West Door, where statues of 10 great world figures, Martin Luther King Jr., among them, look down on visitors to this, the Queen's church.

Along the north and south aisles, through the choir section, Poets' Corner, tombs of monarchs, memorials, effigies, plaques and monuments, the invited guests paraded past the pride of Britain – the martyrs and saints and knighted lot bearing silent witness. At almost every step, feet trudged on the graves of countrymen – William Wilberforce, Charles Dickens, Rudyard Kipling, George Frederick Handel, Laurence Olivier. Over there is the tomb of Sir Isaac Newton, over here the likenesses of past prime ministers. Not to mention the kings and queens and courtiers buried in shrines and tombs long looted for their treasures.

Near noon, with the organ that the incomparable Henry Purcell once played (it's been repaired) soaring above the congregational hymn "Praise My Soul the King of Heaven," the procession took the archbishop, leading clergy of other denominations and the Queen up the south aisle, right past a row of journalists – past a descendant of Wilberforce, the great abolitionist; another reporter; and finally, a "reporter" wearing a traditional African print shirt.

Queen Elizabeth, to the right of Prince Philip, walked within inches of this man on her way to the Sacrarium, the rostrum where her gold and burgundy chair rested.

The music was heavenly.

Relatives of Wilberforce carried in a copy of the Act of Parliament of 1807 that ended the slave trade, directly behind three escorts bearing the first edition of Olaudah Equiano's book, Interesting Narrative of a Slave, which brought the first-hand account of slavery's horrors to Britain in the 1700s.

Poignant and moving, the moment was captured by the Adventist Vocal Ensemble singing the traditional negro spiritual, "There is a Balm in Gilead," with such pathos and drama that the massive structure seemed to heave and exhale as the harmonies settled on the words "sin-sick soul."

Wilberforce's parliamentary speech from 1789, a spiritual, scripture and orchestral pronouncement took the archbishop to the pulpit for his sermon.

The national commemorative service was to be the high point of events marking the bicentenary. It also underscored the conundrum the event created for the Church of England, the monarchy and Britain.

Of all the European countries that benefited from the slave trade, Britain is doing the most to face up to its past. Some £30 million are being spent on the bicentenary – in displays and museum exhibits, dramatic shows, commemorations and development of a school curriculum.

But Blair, fearing any statement of apology might fuel attempts to seek reparations, has skated around the issue, angering some.

The Church of England owned hundred of slaves, branded them like cattle on plantations in Barbados and, of course, made money off the evil. The church has apologized and is studying what to do about reparations.

The Queen, meanwhile, has been mum on the subject. The monarchy, too, was deeply involved in the early slave trade. Queen Elizabeth I invested in the early voyages of John Hawkins, loaned him her armed 700-ton ship, Jesus of Lubeck, as a slave vessel, made money from the investment, and knighted Hawkins for his efforts.

Other royals followed suit.

A few years ago, Rastafarians from Jamaica wrote Queen Elizabeth II seeking reparations. Her response, lawyerly, skirted the issue this way:

"Under the statue of the International Civil Court, acts of enslavement committed today do constitute crimes against humanity. But the historic slave trade was not a crime against humanity or contrary to international law at the time when the U.K. government condoned it."

Nick Hazelwood, in his book The Queen's Slave Trader: John Hawkyns, Elizabeth and Trafficking in Human Souls, writes: "In their simplest form the Hawkins voyages were exercises in turning a quick profit: for the Queen, for himself, and for the group of rich London merchants and royal courtiers who had invested in the expedition."

If all that weighed on Archbishop Rowan Williams, he did not shrink.

"We are born into a world already scarred by the internationalizing and industrializing of slavery ... and our human inheritance is shadowed by it," he told the Queen and her guests.

"We who are heirs of the slave-owning and slave-trading nations of the past have to face the fact that our historic prosperity was built in large part on this atrocity; those who are heirs of the communities ravaged by the slave trade know very well that much of their present suffering and struggling is the result of centuries of abuse."

It is true that other European countries, as well as Arab and Asian nations, share the stain of slavery, today and in the past, he said. "But today it is for us to face our history; the Atlantic trade was our contribution to this universal sinfulness.

"Slavery is not a regional problem in the human world; it is hideously persistent in our nations and cultures."

With that said, the service moved to the most solemn portion, Confession and Absolution.

As the Dean of Westminster led the audience in prayer, starting with "Let us therefore confess our sins in penitence ..." the "reporter" in the African print shirt stood up and walked to the bottom of the steps, below the Queen.

For a moment it seemed part of the program.

Stunned security and church officials hesitated, then grabbed him, and he stumbled to the ground, shouting, staccato: "Let. Go. Of. Me." Several black guests moved in to calm the protester.

Johnny Hogg, a descendant of Wilberforce, was one seat over when the protester rose.

"This is a public relations disaster on a day like today," Hogg said afterwards. "Four white people wrestling a black guy to the ground is not what you want (in news clips and pictures)."

Toyin Agbetu, 39, it turns out, is a writer and founder of a non-profit organization and website called Ligali, which challenges negative stereotypes of people of African descent in the media. He had obtained a media pass to be present in the abbey.

Hogg and descendants of William Clarkson, the other white abolitionist who supplied Wilberforce with much of his ammunition, say Agbetu injected a dose of raw reality into a dignified, carefully scripted service.

"These things run very deep," said Saphie Clarkson.

"He's got a point," said Caroline Roots, a Clarkson descendant. "When I saw him, I thought, `Blimey, how did that happen?' He snuck under the wire."

"If nothing else, it makes us realize this is still such a big issue that still makes people angry today," Hogg said.

Outside the abbey, the Queen later laid a wreath at the Innocent Victims Memorial in honour of all those who suffered and still suffer from slavery.

Leo Muhammad of the Nation of Islam wasn't impressed.

"Crocodile tears," he said. "The Queen is complicit; the monarchy is complicit. All this you see around here was built on slavery."

Penitence notwithstanding, this is a historic hurt that courses deep in the psyche, 200 years later.

[zulaika]

mike,

did u notice how the queen never looked at the dude throughout the whole ordeal? i mean she would not even look at him to see what is the cause of his concern...if this is not a testiment to her and her folk's complete disregard for the color folk and their struggles that she is responsible for, i don't know what is. and like the poor fella said, the english never apologized for slavery..abolishing it means they found other avenues to exploit the less fortunate and not neccessarily out of the good of their cold hearts.

[gedo_gurl]

"But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength, would have no reason to conspire. They needed only to rise up and shake themselves, like a horse shaking off flies. If they chose, they could blow the party to pieces tomorrow morning. Surely, sooner or later, it must occur to them to do it. And yet ..." 1984

This says it all: The Queen to the Rastafarians "But the historic slave trade was not a crime against humanity or contrary to international law at the time when the U.K. government condoned it" I hate this family so much, luckily I got my passport before they introduced the law of swearing in her name.

Horta ninkaan 'walaalkaada' maxaa ka dhigey? Miyaad iloodey waxaad tahey?

[Grant]

African Slavery in 1995

http://members.aol.com/casmasalc/africa ... trade.html

ARAB MASTERS—BLACK SLAVES

by Samuel Cotton

Prologue

African Americans have contended for decades with a rage born of remembrance--a resentment fomented by poignant images of black Africans captured, bound, and sent into the horrors of slavery. Some have been driven to travel to the continent of Africa, and stand on the shores of West Africa to view the actual places where the degradation of a race began. At these places, the grandchildren of ancient slaves--survivors of a holocaust--wrestle with a terrible mixture of emotions. The passions produced by t he realization that the forts before them housed their African ancestors in their last days of freedom before a long voyage delivered them into the hands of cruel masters. The white hot anger that rises slowly in African Americans as they recall these events and the epithets that dance in the heads of these observers of the past, sometimes escapes their lips as curses and bitter mutterings. Occasionally, African Americans simply fulminate. These bitter expressions of resentment and grief have only be en cooled and soothed by a belief that African Americans hold. The comforting assurance that the buying and selling of black African slaves ended in the distant past. Such a belief is a myth.

It has become clear that the enslavement of black Africans did not stop with the demise of the Atlantic Slave Trade. That on this very day and hour, as you read this, black Africans are bought and sold in two North African countries. In the Islamic R epublic of Mauritania, black Africans continue to be enslaved by their Arab-Berber masters. Although slavery was declared abolished three times since Mauritania's independence in 1960, it persists. Slaves are given as wedding gifts, traded for camels, g uns or trucks, and inherited. The children of slaves belong to the master and slaves who displease their masters or attempt escapes are tortured in the most brutal manner imaginable.

In Sudan, Africa's largest country, the Islamic Republic of the Sudan, as a result of an Islamic-vs.-Christian civil war, black women and children (mostly Christian) are captured in raids on their villages and sold as chattel slaves, sometimes, according to the UN in "modern-day slave markets."

The Mauritanian Embassy and the Sudanese Mission were contacted several times for comment—they did not return the calls.



Mauritania—A Legacy of Slave Trading

The enslavement of black Africans has existed in Mauritania for many centuries. It is a country that joins the descendants of Arabs and Berbers from the North, known as beydanes [white men], and the black ethnic communities living in the South. Blacks, mostly sedentary farmers, consisting of the Tukulor, the Fulani, and the Wolof tribes were brought north after being captured by raiding Arab/Berber tribes. This activity predates and postdates the Atlantic slave trade. Simply put, the slave trade that brought black Africans to these shores never stopped in Mauritania. "More than 100,000 descendants of Africans conquered by Arabs during the 12th century are still thought to be living as old-fashioned chattel slaves in Mauritania" says Newsweek after co nducting a yearlong, four-continent investigation of slavery.

Differing only slightly with this estimate, the U.S. State Department estimates that 90,000 blacks still live as the property of Berbers, "and that's a conservative estimate," said Dr. Jacobs, who puts the actual figure closer to 300,000 when interviewe d by The News Tribune. In addition, Newsweek states that "Aside from the shantytowns and a strip of land along the Senegal River, virtually all blacks are slaves, and they are more than half the population."

"Black Africans in Mauritania were converted to Islam more than 100 years ago," says Mohamed Athie, Executive Director of the American Anti-Slavery Group, [and]. . ."the Koran forbids the enslavement of fellow Muslims, but in this country race outranks r eligious doctrine. . . Though they are Muslims, these people are chattel: used for labor, sex and breeding."

Africa Watch reported that "Religion has been used by masters as an important instrument to perpetuate slavery. Relying on the fact that Islam recognizes the practice of slavery, they have misinterpreted it to justify current practices. In truth, Islam only permits treating as slaves, non-Islamic captives caught after holy wars, on condition that they are released as soon as they convert to Islam. People living as slaves in Mauritania long before the first abolition in 1905 were all Moslems, but this d id not lead to their emancipation. We received numerous complaints about the extent of which qadis (judges in Islamic courts) continue to exercise their judicial functions to protect the institution of slavery, rather than to ensure its eradication."

Successive regimes outlawed slavery in 1905, at independence in 1960, and most recently in 1980. These edicts were only lip service and window dressing. The proof is that since independence all economic and political power have remained firmly in the h ands of beydanes.

The Sudanese government never passed any laws providing punishment for enslaving black Africans and they never bothered to tell many of the slaves about emancipation. In 1980, the government sought to have its ruling ratified by a body of religious juri st, the ulema. The jurists said that slavery is not wrong on religious grounds, but that outlawing it would be within the government's competence--provided that owners were compensated for the manumission of slaves. Nobody has ever applied for compensation."

These black African slaves in Mauritania are subjected to mental and emotional torments that have always been concomitant with slavery. "Routine punishments for the slightest fault include beatings, denial of food and prolonged exposure to the sun, with hands and feet tied together. "Serious" infringement of the master's rule can mean prolonged tortures, documented in a report by Africa Watch. These include 1. The "camel treatment," where a human being is wrapped around the belly of a dehydrated came l and tied there. The camel is then given water and drinks until its belly expands enough to tear apart the slave. 2. The "insect treatment," where insects are put in his ears. The ears are waxed shut. The arms and legs are bound. The person goes ins ane from the bugs running around in his head. 3. The "burning coals" where the victim is seated flat, with his legs spread out. He is then buried in sand up to his waist, until he cannot move. Coals are placed between his legs and are burnt slowly. A fter a while, the legs, thighs and sex of the victim are burnt. There are other gruesome tortures--none of which is fit to describe in a family newspaper" states Africa Watch. Another report states that some slaves caught fleeing are often castrated or branded like cattle.



Slave Trade in Sudan

"Sudan is the Arabic word for "black" but only the southern part of the country is populated by black Africans who practice traditional religions or Christianity. In the southern Nile Basin the Dinka and Nuer tribes practice a semi-nomadic economy base d on cattle raising.

The Sudan is formerly a parliamentary democracy. From 1899 through 1955 it was ruled jointly by the British and the Egyptians as the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Sudanese nationalism gradually redeveloped, and on January 1, 1956, Sudan became independent. Upon independence, civil war broke out between the black southerners and the Arab northerners who now ruled the country. This war lasted until 1972 and ended with the Addis Ababa accord.

In 1989, Lt. General Omar Hassan Bashir and the Sudanese People's Armed Forces overthrew Sudan's democratic government and dissolved all political institutions. This new government and it's Popular Defense Force (PDF), is said to be controlled by a fund amentalist Islamic group called the National Islamic Front.

This action set the stage for the second civil war when southerners, 6,000,000 people, saw their special constitutional status overthrown by the Arab government in Khartoum. Previously, the black south had its own regional parliament and government. Additional pressures were the Arabization and Islamization of the country, particularly the imposition since 1983 of Islamic law in the South. The people of the South, many of them Christians, feel this is oppressive and strongly resisted. Under the lead ership of John Garang, the Sudanese People Liberation Army (SPLA) was formed. Garang, a former colonel in the Presidential Guard, is a Dinka and his movement has splintered along tribal lines.

The civil war also led to the resurgence of the slave trade. The Sudan was once virtually rid of slavery, but "Time has spun backward since rebel leader John Garang rallied the African tribes of the country's fertile south against the country's Muslim e lite" says Newsweek. ". . .The government counterinsurgency strategy has included arming the Arab tribespeople who live on the fault line between the Muslim north and the animist south. Consequently, there has been a resurgence of traditional raiding--i ncluding slave taking, human-rights organization charge." Arab militias, armed by the Government, raid villages, mostly those of the Dinka tribe, shoot the men and enslave the women and children. These are kept as personal property or marched north and sold," wrote AASG's Jacobs and Athie in the New York Times (July 13, 94.) [and] "Many of the children are auctioned off."

Corroborating this testimony is Gaspar Biro, a specially appointed United Nations human rights monitor, who returned from the Sudan in March to report that ". . .abducted children are often sent to camps that become 20th century slave markets. The price varies with supply. According to the London Economist (January 6, 90) in 1989, a woman or child could be bought for $90. In 1990, as the raids increased, the price fell to $15.

Jacobs and Athie explain that "Not only are their bodies in bondage, but they are also stripped of their cultural, religious and personal identities." A case in point is the life of Abuk Thuc Akwar, a 13-year-old girl, who along with 24 other children, was captured by the militia, marched north and given to a farmer. Interviewed by an investigator from Anti-Slavery International she states that "Throughout the day she worked in his sorghum fields and at night in his bed. During the march she was raped and called a black donkey," the investigator wrote in a 1990 report.

Some have asked why the Dinkas allow themselves to be treated like this? The Reporter, a journal published in England, interviewed an educated Dinka. He explained: "The people taken are usually ignorant, and unorganized. Though many in number, they h ave no power or weapons. When displaced, they are frightened, vulnerable and weak. People in the slave trade, by contrast, are part of the government system -- army, police, militia -- and Government people have relatives who need labor; they turn a blind eye to it.

Many officials living now in Khartoum, who have served in the South, have slaves in their homes, though they deny this. The head of state, Omar Hassan el Beshir, is reputed to have six or eight slaves in his home in Khartoum."



The Race Factor

There is a belief among African Americans about Arabs near and far that may cause them to shrink in disbelief and doubt the credibility of these reports. Many blacks feel that racism and racist attitudes do not exist among Arabs, especially Muslims, and that there is a common bond between black people and Arabs, and again, I must add--particularly Muslims. It is partly for this reason, that the Arab slave trade has always been played down.

This perception was reinforced among African Americans by the experiences of Malcolm X. His positive interactions with beydanes (white men) played a significant part in his transformation from Black Muslim to Orthodox Muslim. Malcolm stated quite elate dly, "America needs to understand Islam, because this is the one religion that erases from its society the race problem. "Throughout my travels in the Muslim world, I have met, talked to, and even eaten with people who in America would have been consider ed 'white'--but the 'white' attitude was removed from their minds by the religion of Islam. . . .We were truly all the same (brothers)--because their belief in one God had removed the 'white' from their minds, the 'white' from their behavior, and the 'whi te' from their attitude." (The Autobiography of Malcolm X pg. 345, 346) Are these perceptions true? Does racism along with economics drive slavery in these two countries, and possibly other Arab nations, as was the case in the Judeo-Christian We st? This question must be asked of other Arab nations because "The UN report suspects that many blacks are sold into Libya."

In Mauritania, Newsweek spoke to Fahl Ould Saed Ahmed the owner of two 10-year slave boys. He was asked if there was racism or slavery [in his country]. He replied "There is no racism, thaere is no slavery." The truth is that "In Mauritania, there is a Muslim ruling class made up of Berbers and Arabs, whose base is in the north of the country. They enslave thousands of blacks, who are cut off from their tribes in the south. from their language and culture.< P> They are Islamicized and made slaves for life." said Dr. Jacobs who, along with Mohamed Athie was featured on a PBS expose of modern day slavery that aired on Tony Brown's Journal, the week of January 6 to the 12. "All the blacks of Mauritania converte d to Islam a hundred years ago," Athie said. "The nation forbids it. The religion forbids it. Yet slavery goes on. And it is clearly racial in nature. These people are slaves solely because they are black. A non-black Muslim is not enslaved, a black one is."

In 1992, Newsweek spoke to a slave named Dada Ould Mbarek in Mauritania: "He was asked: weren't Mauritania's slaves emancipated? 'I never heard of it,' he said. 'And what's more, I don't believe it. Slaves free? Never here.' Isn't he the same as hi s master? 'No, I'm different. A master is a master and a slave is a slave. Masters are white, slaves are black.' Is this just? 'Naturally, we blacks should be the slaves of the whites." Dada Ould Mbarek manifests the effects of physical and psycholog ical slavery. He sadly has come to think that black men are inferior to whites.

Africa Watch spoke to Moussa Ndiaye (not his real name), he was a teacher in Tagant region from 1984 until he was deported in May 1989. Moussa Ndiaye sheds further light on the race factor when he explains that ". . .The center of the social order is th e white master who has the right to do nothing while the blacks do all the work.

When the master goes to the fields, he usually sits in the shade of a tree and is served tea while the blacks do all the work. No white woman does any domestic work. All household tasks are done by slave women who have grown up in the household. Altho ugh she grows up together with the white children, she is made to understand, from a tender age, that she is at the service of the master."



Slavery and the Media’s Silence

Since the existence of human bondage has been proved undoubtely, there are two questions that must be answered. First, why has the media given such little attention to this story, and second, who if anyone, is doing anything about it.

Dr. Jacobs, Director of Research of AASG, claims that slavery has been legitimately documented by any number of human rights groups around the globe for many years now. So, why is there so little coverage?

Jacobs: "People have to understand that what is called "the news" is primarily the account of the exploits of white people. Blacks appear only in the context of white action, usually on the receiving end. Non-whites are not portrayed as agents of histo ry, only as victims and responders to it. Newscasters who are conservative show good white action to celebrate Western civilization. Liberal newscasters show bad white action to scold and/or to improve whites.

In North Africa, there are no white actors, good or bad, so the place is essentially invisible. Compare this to South Africa where the news went wild, in my view, to show whites how they might become better people by abandoning apartheid. The media doe sn't care that the slaves in Khartoum suffer more than the disenfranchised in Johannesburg, no whites, no news."

Q: But some would say, it is hard for the media to get into the closed societies of Mauritania and Sudan.

A: "They get everywhere else. If whites were made slaves, they'd find a way to cover it. And besides, there are some pictures. Newsweek did one story on it, but the media does not think it is important enough to follow up."



A Political Problem

Slavery is not the work solely of individuals--the governments of Mauritania and the Sudan are involved. Gaspar Biro, the UN human rights monitor reports that the government in Khartoum is complicit in these crimes, if not committing them outright. Con sequently, this problem of slavery requires both the actions of individuals and political action from the United States and other world governments.

There have been efforts from certain congressmen to pass needed legislation. Congressman Barney Frank, in part as a response of the work of Athie and Jacobs, introduced a House Resolution (#572) last year in the Congress that would require the US to act against slaving nations. It was lost in the shuffle and died at the end of a hectic session. Frank says he will soon re-introduce the item in this session of Congress. In addition, Congressman Frank Torricelli (D-NJ) is calling for Congressional Heari ngs on the slave trade.

Yet a peculiar silence is observed from those who would be the most natural forces to fight for black slaves -- the coalition that fought apartheid -- blacks and liberals. When asked on PBS who was helping their group to fight the slave trade, Jacobs an d Athie cited Frank and Torricelli, but said no one from the Black Caucus was being supportive.

When asked recently by a reporter, Rep. Donald Payne (D-NJ) said he would support Barney Frank's Resolution. and, referring to the Black Caucus, he said "We certainly have grave concerns about these reported cases, [and] "I remember that we condemned th e treatment of black people in Mauritania in the House about two years ago." Yet, it seems strange that in condemning the treatment of Mauritanians, the Black Caucus frames the issue in Mauritania as one of human rights, and does not speak of it as chatt el slavery. Torricelli has no such compunction.

Similarly, Payne went to Sudan last year, visited the refugee camps, but again came back not mentioning the issue of slavery, yet UN special investigator Gaspar Biro came back with stories of modern day slave markets. Has Payne not read Biro's report?

Frank Kiehne, Payne's foreign affairs advisor responded, "We're convinced that slavery still exists in Mauritnia. The congressman is one of those sponsoring HR505, the bill to cut off foreign aid to Mauritania until they shape up. We know that slavery exists in the Sudan but it's pretty hard to pin down, because it's mainly in the south and it's hard to get in and out of there."

The Black Caucus was criticized last March, when 25 relief groups met to call for stepped-up pressures on the Sudanese government. Washington Post staff writer Ken Ringle reported that "the black caucus was noticeably absent." The only black Congressman to attend was Floyd Flake (D-N.Y.) who stated clearly that he was there on his own and not as a representative of the Caucus.

One of the conference arrangers, Nina Shea, of the Puebla Institute, a Washington-based human rights group focusing on religio us freedom, speculated that the caucus didn't want to be involved in the criticism of an Islamic government.

Ringle himself guessed that the issue of black slaves serving Arab Islamic masters was "discomfiting to those in this country promoting the idea of African unity, in part because it reawakens the image of the Arab slave trade in Africa that long pre-date d and post-dated that in the New World." He went on to say that the slave issue could "further exacerbate the tensions between black Christian ministers and followers of Louis Farrakan's National of Islam."

On the TV program, Tony Brown's Journal, Jacobs and Athie said they had written and called members of the caucus with their documentation of the slave trade, but were ignored. When asked specifically if he thought there was a fear on the part of the cau cus to criticize an Islamic country or if the caucus had Farrakan in mind when they thought about black slaves serving Arab Islamic masters, Jacobs replied, "I can't imagine any member of the Black Caucus who would place his relationship with anybody or a nything in front of what he must feel is a sacred duty to black women and children who are now slaves. I am sure that when they finally become aware of this issue, they will act with dispatch."

Mohamed Athie, as the keynote speaker on Martin Luther King Day at the University of Chicago said, "We need people to support the legislative proposals of Barney Frank and Robert Toricelli,"

Jacobs said . "We need to get the word out that these things are going on. We are trying to form a grass-roots organization to combat this horror. To my mind, the largest pressure brought upon South Africa to end apartheid came from the United States and especially from the organized blacks of the United States. We need the Congressional Black Caucus and other black organizations to really pay attention to this issue of slavery. We can end slavery like we ended apartheid."

Despite overwhelming evidence of the slave trade, the silence and apathy persist. Despite the powerful evidence presented by Dr. Jacobs -- evidence strong enough in June, to get the beleaguered American branch of Amnesty International to decide it was time to abolish slavery.

When presented with evidence of human bondage in North Africa, the members voted to add to an already crowded mandate the emancipation of chattel slaves. What more do black and white political officials need to know to shatter t heir apathy and strange silence?

Perhaps fear of incurring the wrath of the Islamic governments of Mauritania and the Sudan lies at the heart of the issue. It is dangerous business to expose corrupt regimes in Islamic countries.

Examine the experiences of Gaspar Biro. Gaspar Biro is a 36-year-old Romanian-born lawyer, who was dispatched by the U.N. a year ago to investigate allegations of human rights abuses so widespread and so flagrant they have drawn denunciations from around the globe says the Washington Post. Biro produced a 4 2-page report to the U.N.'s Commission on Human Rights in Geneva. He pointed to slave trafficking, and that the Sudanese criminal law provides routinely for flogging, amputation, death by stoning, and in special cases, for the execution and crucifixion of children as young as 7. The Sudanese called his report a "flagr ant blasphemy and a deliberate insult to the Islamic Religion" on which it says Sudanese law is based. In the press they compared him to Salman Rushdie in affronts to the Koran "for which Mr. Biro should bear the responsibility."

The Washington Post states that Biro said it would be out of his mandate as a monitor or "Special Rapporteur" for the U.N. to question the wisdom of any religious ordinance or belief. He said provisions of Sudanese law providing for things like the ston ing of adulterers or the crucifixion of children were brought into effect not by religious authorities but by the secular machinery of a secular government organized in many respects like a Western-style state. "It's a very schizoid situation over there. They didn't have to join these U.N. conventions on human rights," he said. "Saudi Arabia, for example, has not. But since they did they must be held accountable. That was my mission to examine this sort of thing." Despite this logic, an official rep ly from the Sudanese government called it "a prejudiced report against Muslim beliefs all over the world, demeaning the source of their inspiration and faith."

In addition, to veiled threats against his life, Biro has received very clear threats. On March 25, 1994 Biro had breakfast at the Puebla Institute, located in Washington, with about 10 members of groups making up the coalition for Peace in the Horn of Africa. In walks Safwat Siddiq of the Sudanese embassy who had not been invited. Safwat Siddiq then proceeded to tape the proceedings and warn Biro about offenses to Islam. "He was very polite," said Puebla's Nina Shea, who witnessed and reported the e ncounter. "But the point was made."

When asked about these threats, Biro said "I was aware from the first day of this situation, and that it would come to this state if I described things as they are," he said softly. "This, you see, is nothing new for me." Biro was raised amid the repre ssive Romania of the late dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, "I lived always with one foot in prison. I know well how totalitarian governments operate, how they think they can hide things and what they try to do. I think perhaps the Sudanese overlooked that possibility when they let me in the country."

On this subject of attacking Islam, Rep. Barney Frank said in the Washington Post: "But this is not an indictment of all Arabs, just a few Arabs. When abuses occur it is much better to identify them than to ignore them because of fear or possible reper cussions. That way the abuse continues and the situation worsens." Frank is correct. This is not an indictment of the tenets of Islam, but of those men who claim to be Muslim but are not following its teachings.

This should cause Arabs to rise up in indignation--not at those exposing this injustice, but at those disrespecting the word of Allah. And Muslims have done just that. Courageous Arabs have risked there lives to get this information out.

Men who kno w and actually live the law of Allah. Men like Dr. Ushari Ahmad Mahmud, a lecturer at Khartoum University, and Dr. Suleyman Ali Baldo who drew the attention of the international community to the re-emergence of slavery in Sudan. In July 1987 they wrote Al Diein Massacre: Slavery in the Sudan, which detailed the massacre of over 1,000 Dinka men women and children, some of whom were burnt to death, in El Diein, the main town in the province of Southern Darfur. Bravely these two men reported that hundred s of Dinka children and women have been kidnapped from Diein and other villages by government-supported Rizeigat militias and are now living in slavery.

The two Muslims stated that "We believe it is the role of Sudanese intellectuals to squarely address instances of the violation of human right[s] in the country. And it was this belief which prompted us to investigate the Diein massacre and the re-emergence of slavery in the Sudan.. . .We present the results of our investigations into the massacre and t he practice of slavery in this report. We hope that it will encourage others to work to expose publicly all violations of human rights in the Sudan so that we may work together to change the conditions that make such violations possible.



Epilogue

When that which was done in the dark is brought into the light. When evils are exposed, such as the evils of slavery, invariably the characters of those who grasp the revelation are ineluctably tested. For, it is easy to rant and rage against horrors lost in antiquity, to express bitterness and anger for those tortured souls now asleep in death, or to shake our fists at ghosts. The difficulty lies in opposing a living adversary whose rapacious appetites have devastated all that one holds dear.

It is a profound experience when an adversary stops running and turns to meet you in battle. When a plunderer points to his spoils and hurls a challenge that finds its mark in the very center of your being -- " Yes, I did it--now what are you going to do about it?" Yes, what will be done about the question of slavery?

It must be remembered that this present curse is also a blessing--an opportunity. History rarely gives one a chance to confront a tormentor lost to time and place. Have we not, one and all, fantasized and conjured up visions of arriving in time to prevent the rape of mother Africa, or fighting our way to the main deck of the slave ship Zion to free its terrified cargo. Well, a window in time has reopened, but what will we do about it?

Ultimately, each African American must examine the evidence with their heart and conscience, and decide where they will stand on this issue of slavery. Whether they choose to close their eyes and ignore the enslavement of black Africans—preferring to shake their fist at the ghosts of the distant past. Or whether they decide to join the ranks of the newly formed abolitionist movements to raise a unified voice in protest. One thing is clear: Until the enslavement of Black African men, women, and chil dren vanishes from this earth, this discussion will go on--and on, and on.

[Steeler [Crawler2]]

Gedo
Somalis are always hating on somebody.

Mick
The slave trade was a direct result of Africans capturing and selling other Africans. There is a fair possibility that the ancestors of the individual protesting were the ones taking people into bondage and selling them. Whites didn't do that. White's could barely step foot on the continent in the 18th and early 19th century without dying from disease to which they had no resistance.

The issue with apology is that reparations follow on the heels of that. And that is a can of worms that nobody dare open. Where does it end? Do the Scotts and Irish (3/4 of my ancestory) get reparations because of English colonialization and force assmilation practices. The exploitation of the Irish for cheap labor. The fact that the British let one quarter of the population starve to death during the great patato famine???? Or maybe the other quarter of my heritage, which is native American, should be compensated for because of the stealing of native lands and the genocide committed against native Americans........I could go on and on. It's a sysaphean thing. You can not possibly make up for or compensate for crimes committed generations past.

As for the protestor. His right to protest does not take precedent over the right of others to conduct a civil ceremony. His behavior was that of a cad.

[Skippa]

Apologies are overrated!!! Besides, what's the point of an apology when the leucoderms clearly aren't done yet! it's like
"I am sorry...now ready your rump for round two" or like that movie scene when Malcolm McDowell (Caligula) decides to be the first to have a go at a groom's wife on his wedding night right in front of him...and when done, decides to take a turn at the bewildered hubby! Like it or not, you're gettin' it so you might as well enjoy the fockery Sambo!

[Padishah]

[quote="MAD MAC"]
You can not possibly make up for or compensate for crimes committed generations past.
[/quote]


Then you'd agree that Germany should stop paying for the sins of their grandfathers with these reparations of theirs, and the rest of us don't have to suffer being reminded of the Holocaust ad nauseum.

Look forward to the day where I don't get indignant responses when I dismiss Hitler's Genocide of European Jews out of hand.

[michael_ital]

Padishah

Amiin to that

Grant

I'm not quite sure of the relevance of your post.

MAC

Of COURSE they should pay. And you can't compare the two plights. Is the state of micks and scots the same as african slave ancestors today ? I think not.

[Grant]

" Is the state of micks and scots the same as african slave ancestors today ? I think not."

Mike,

I don't think I am the confused party here. There are damn few African slave ancestors alive in Britain today, but there are still a good number in Sudan and Mauretania and scattered throughout the Arab world.

The Queen and "Poodle" Blair were celebrating 200 years of British recognition of the evils of slavery. Since the British were some of the first to do so, I hardly find these events humiliating to them.

I think those seeking reparations from the descendants of descendants would do far better working to end this evil where it still exists and where it is still promoted as an immutable religious perquisite and duty.

It's one of those mote and beam things. If African slavery was such a bad thing two hundred years ago that it deserves reparations, what is it today?

[Steeler [Crawler2]]

"Then you'd agree that Germany should stop paying for the sins of their grandfathers with these reparations of theirs, and the rest of us don't have to suffer being reminded of the Holocaust ad nauseum."

I would agree 100% that Germany owes the Jews nothing at this point. The people who committed the crimes and the people who were victimized by them are mostly long dead. Where individuals can be identified, they should be prosecuted. But that's it. My sons mother is irate about this topic. She is always saying "Why should I pay for something I had nothing to do with?" And, of course, she is right.

As for suffering about being reminded, well, anyone can remind you. Not much you can do about that. I have to be constantly reminded that there are annoying focking Muslims everywhere on the planet who won't shut the fock up, but that's life.

"MAC

Of COURSE they should pay. And you can't compare the two plights. Is the state of micks and scots the same as african slave ancestors today ? I think not."

Mick, who is "they" kemosabe? My ancestors had NOTHING to do with slavery. They were poor farmers for six generations in Nova Scotia and Northern Maine. Before that, they lived in the Scottish highlands. My Irish anestors OBVIOUSLY had nothing to do wtih slavery, they were virtually slaves themselves.

So who pays? And who gets? Does someone who has some ancestors who were slaves and some who were slave holders (I am reminded of Sally Hemmings and Thomas Jeffersons lineage) both pay money and get money? Which governments pay and to whom? Who decides what's fair? This is a pandora's box. Nobody is going to open it, and nobody should.

[LiQaaye_TDH]

Yeah I saw that on tv, he really embarrassed tony blair and the british nation..what I hated the most, was the black people in the crowd singing along with the white people…..

[biko]

you guys are jokers. how did he humiliate the queen? the man shouted in the middle of ceremony and demended an apology to be made.

if there is any humiliation, its black people who are humiliated with all this slavery palava programes. claiming to be sorry but cant even bring themselves to at least sound little bit sincer.

may be black people should start wearing that small jewish cup on their head then they will be taken seriously.