Why doesn't the U.S take out ISIS?

[eliteSomali]

The United States destroys countries and overthrows governments at will. They say they are fighting terrorism but they usually they aren't. Here is a real terrorist group that need to be stopped but the U.S is just sitting there talking about it's iraq's responsibility to get rid off those guys. They attack functioning governments, overthrow them and leave the people in chaos and anarchy but when the real terrorists show up, these niggas won't do a damn thing. If there is ever a time where people would agree with the U.S attacking anyone, it is now.

[FarhanYare]

Has it occurred to you that ISIS is working for U.S?

[SultanOrder]

US helped train and fund these guys, they have a mission and that is to take out Assad. They got carried away and went into Iraq and almost harmed American interests, but a few air strikes put them in their place. Now their next job is to get the US involved in Syria with air strikes, and they are close to succeeding. Soon American public will demand we bomb these guys in Syria, after all bombing in Iraq alone isn't enough.

[eliteSomali]

The u.s is not responsible for these guys. The mistake they made was release bagdadi guy. That guy is one sick fucker. The question is how does ISIS strengthening in numbers and capital benefit the U.S? Might I remind you that as of now they are a direct threat to U.S interest. If the U.S can attack sadam over a suspicion, what reason do they have letting these guys live? It is ironic because for years the u.s government has been abusing the term terrorism, and finally that have a created real terrorists.

[eliteSomali]

Has it occurred to you that ISIS is working for U.S?

That's just a conspiracy. The U.S doesn't need anyone to fight its wars.

[Malachite]

So many Conspiracy bullshit circulating around IS. IS is a US creation, an Israeli creation, the leader is a Mossad agent, IS answers to Obama, the US plan to blame IS for a "false flag" attack...it's quite silly. I think there was a labour party politician who was fired in a cyber terrorism task force for tweeting that IS is a zionist hoax.

IS is an accident of the Iraqi political chaos and the Syrian civil war happening simultaneously in the two neighboring countries, spilling over the borders and forming one, jihadist movement looking to form an extremist Islamic state. That's it. Nothing else to explain.

But the "I don't have a strategy" shit is unforgivable. He needs to take out these savages

[SultanOrder]

The u.s is not responsible for these guys. The mistake they made was release bagdadi guy. That guy is one sick fucker. The question is how does ISIS strengthening in numbers and capital benefit the U.S? Might I remind you that as of now they are a direct threat to U.S interest. If the U.S can attack sadam over a suspicion, what reason do they have letting these guys live? It is ironic because for years the u.s government has been abusing the term terrorism, and finally that have a created real terrorists.

Dude, while Obama was claiming publicly that he wasn't ready to arm these guys, they (US), Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, were funnelling weapons and men from Libya through Turkey into Syria. They also gave them tactical training and logistics training, in places like Jordan. They also help direct funds from Gulf countries like Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, to these guys.

The US knew before the protests began that because of low rain fall and lack of government assistance that civil unrest would happen, and that if it did salafi radicals could be used to take out Assad. These was all in the NSA leaks.

ISIS is their proxy to defeat Assad, of course they are going to take out ISIS if it becomes necessary. They probably attack both of them in Syria. Remember that in Syria the real obstacle to US policy is Assad.

[eliteSomali]

The u.s is not responsible for these guys. The mistake they made was release bagdadi guy. That guy is one sick fucker. The question is how does ISIS strengthening in numbers and capital benefit the U.S? Might I remind you that as of now they are a direct threat to U.S interest. If the U.S can attack sadam over a suspicion, what reason do they have letting these guys live? It is ironic because for years the u.s government has been abusing the term terrorism, and finally that have a created real terrorists.

Dude, while Obama was claiming publicly that he wasn't ready to arm these guys, they (US), Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, were funnelling weapons and men from Libya through Turkey into Syria. They also gave them tactical training and logistics training, in places like Jordan. They also help direct funds from Gulf countries like Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, to these guys.

The US knew before the protests began that because of low rain fall and lack of government assistance that civil unrest would happen, and that if it did salafi radicals could be used to take out Assad. These was all in the NSA leaks.

ISIS is their proxy to defeat Assad, of course they are going to take out ISIS if it becomes necessary. They probably attack both of them in Syria. Remember that in Syria the real obstacle to US policy is Assad.

I hope you are kidding. Why do people claim every crazy extremists is trained by the u.s? If the u.s wanted to u.s proxys then why do they send their army into place like iraq and Afghanistan where a large number of them die? Morever, what more does Isis need in order for the U.S to says "yah these guys must go"? I suppose it was part of their deal to execute american citizens on camera as well.

Besides, even if they were trained and armed by the u.s initially, it is very clear that at this moment these niggas have agendas of their own.

[SultanOrder]

I never said the US set these guys up directly, but they created the environment for a group like ISIS. How?

1. They trained lots of people whether they were FSA or not, it didn't matter at first.

2. They provided heavy weapons

3. Funding either directly or indirectly, usually gulf money since they are careful where their money goes.

4. Turkey opened their borders so that anybody can go through no matter if they were extremists or not, and let weapons though. To this day Turkey hasn't clamped down on the border.

All of this info is out there. Remember the FSA, these guys who are supposed to be "moderates" the guys Obama was helping out with cash and weapons, worked jointly and openly with ISIS and JN until recently.

Do you remember the red line that Obama set up, if Assad uses chemical weapons US had no choice but to get involved, what happened when he "did" use it? Obama couldn't get the public support to go in, and now with these beheadings he will use it as a pretext to bomb in Syria. It doesn't make sense why America will bomb ISIS in Iraq and not in Syria. Also, look at the limited bombing they have already done, only when ISIS got close to American oil fields I.e. run by American companies. Even the humanitarian bombing had been limited. America wants ISIS gone, but first they want Assad gone, look at the bidet picture.

[BlackRain]

The United States destroys countries and overthrows governments at will. They say they are fighting terrorism but they usually they aren't. Here is a real terrorist group that need to be stopped but the U.S is just sitting there talking about it's iraq's responsibility to get rid off those guys. They attack functioning governments, overthrow them and leave the people in chaos and anarchy but when the real terrorists show up, these niggas won't do a damn thing. If there is ever a time where people would agree with the U.S attacking anyone, it is now.

Just like how the USA created the Taliban -with the help of Pakistan- they created ISIS to take Asad down. This movement will catch fire soon and reach Asad and then the real confrontation between Syra + Russia vs USa and Nato will begin and the world war 3 will happen. How long this will take i have no idea

[visious]

Saudi Arabia created and funded this IS not USA. stop all the conspiracies. just like 9/11 and the Moon landing conspiracy.

these IS just wanna spark a reaction and get the US and UK to go back to Iraq.

The real truth is that they are loosing ground to the Kurds and tried to look strong to their bootylickers (who masturbate furiously to pictures of Baghdadi and other babaric towel heads) by beheading an innocent journalist who was trying to get their side of the story.

Kurdistan will free Iraq from these puss.ies